When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The original script was written with the idea that there would be NO racing footage at all. It was 100% a character study story.
Racing movies have, in general, been modest money earners because they haven't entertained the non-gearhead audience. Note that all of the guest appearances of the actors on the talk shows the past three weeks or so, and all the interviews with Ron Howard about the movie, have played down the racing bit and played up the rivalry. Even the clips that they have been showing have had very little - if any - racing footage. They went out of their way to play down the "racing movie" aspect as they knew that would limit its appeal.
It might do sort of OK in the U.S. but it will rake in a ton of $$$ in the rest of the world.
According to the movie's production notes, this, from producer Andrew Eaton:
Eaton, a co-founder of Revolution Films, recognized that while the movie is set amid the glamour and excitement of F1 racing, at its heart is a story about two quite contrasting personalities. “It’s a character story with two characters: one Austrian, one English,” Eaton says. “It’s mainly about these two men, their different styles and their different lifestyles. But it also happens to have this amazing backdrop of motor racing and Formula 1, making it a character piece with action.”
I think we as members of CF were first drawn to the movie because of its racing dimension. But those seeking a movie about racing might have thought that Titanic was going to be about a sinking ship.
RUSH is a story about a rivalry, it's also a love story, and the track scenes are merely a necessary backdrop.
Really good movie. If I had one thing to complain about, is the lack of a spark plug in the heads during the 'engine shots'.
Anthony, do you ever watch "The Big Bang Theory"? Well, the above complaint would easily put you in the running for "Auto Geek Sheldon"
Top Three
Grand Prix
Rush
Senna
Not necessarily in that order.
Forty seven years later it's easy to forget that those of us who were F1 fans (even way back then) found it quite easy to pick things apart in "Grand Prix" as well. #1 on pretty much every "geek fan's" list was that the most of the cars used in the film were actually rebodied F3 cars and anyone who paid any attention to Euro formula racing could easily tell. It was distracting. So was trying to imagine 6' 2" James Garner squeezing himself into those F3 cars.
I actually saw Grand Prix the very first weekend it was released. Saw it at the Cinerama Dome on Sunset Blvd. in Hollywood. You had to reserve seats! (I also saw Steve McQueen's "Le Mans" first day, first showing! That was in Costa Mesa, CA.) "Le Mans" was better in at least the "real cars were used" sense.
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13
Originally Posted by Zoxxo
Anthony, do you ever watch "The Big Bang Theory"? Well, the above complaint would easily put you in the running for "Auto Geek Sheldon"
Forty seven years later it's easy to forget that those of us who were F1 fans (even way back then) found it quite easy to pick things apart in "Grand Prix" as well. #1 on pretty much every "geek fan's" list was that the most of the cars used in the film were actually rebodied F3 cars and anyone who paid any attention to Euro formula racing could easily tell. It was distracting. So was trying to imagine 6' 2" James Garner squeezing himself into those F3 cars.
I actually saw Grand Prix the very first weekend it was released. Saw it at the Cinerama Dome on Sunset Blvd. in Hollywood. You had to reserve seats! (I also saw Steve McQueen's "Le Mans" first day, first showing! That was in Costa Mesa, CA.) "Le Mans" was better in at least the "real cars were used" sense.
Z//
Yeah they didn't have the real cars, but at the same time I don't think the money was there to have disposable F1 cars to use for the film. Enzo at least gave them some pretty good access to the shop and his cars. Yeah it wasn't perfect but some what of a time capsule.
LeMans....that's in the "Steve McQueen is a bad *** list".
In my opinion............THIS crash which occurred at this year's RMMR on Sunday, August 18th, is an EXACT copy of the F1 crassh shown in the movie "Rush".
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13
Originally Posted by Zoxxo
Anthony, do you ever watch "The Big Bang Theory"? Well, the above complaint would easily put you in the running for "Auto Geek Sheldon"
Forty seven years later it's easy to forget that those of us who were F1 fans (even way back then) found it quite easy to pick things apart in "Grand Prix" as well. #1 on pretty much every "geek fan's" list was that the most of the cars used in the film were actually rebodied F3 cars and anyone who paid any attention to Euro formula racing could easily tell. It was distracting. So was trying to imagine 6' 2" James Garner squeezing himself into those F3 cars.
I actually saw Grand Prix the very first weekend it was released. Saw it at the Cinerama Dome on Sunset Blvd. in Hollywood. You had to reserve seats! (I also saw Steve McQueen's "Le Mans" first day, first showing! That was in Costa Mesa, CA.) "Le Mans" was better in at least the "real cars were used" sense.
Z//
When Grand Prix was first released...wasn't it done in some sort of 'super wide angle' at the theaters? We saw Rush on one of the new XD super big screens but I would love to see some of the old movies how they were originally shown.
When Grand Prix was first released...wasn't it done in some sort of 'super wide angle' at the theaters? We saw Rush on one of the new XD super big screens but I would love to see some of the old movies how they were originally shown.
Yes. It was in "Super Panavision 70" which was that era's "IMAX".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Panavision
As I said, my girlfriend and I saw it at the Cinerama Dome on Sunset Blvd. in Hollywood. It's a great theater for seeing "big" movies like "Grand Prix." As the Wikipedia page states, the theater has been refurbished/restored and now is one of only three theaters in the world that can show original three-camera Cinerama films as they were originally meant to be seen. Nice.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Wife and I went to see it last night. We both enjoyed it. Due to some of the reviews here I was expecting little to no racing footage, but I honestly thought it was sufficient footage to get the story told. Wife actually suggested seeing it again.
The missing spark plug thing kept bugging me though.
This is the camera car that gathered live racing footage during the 1970 Le Mans that was used in McQueen's movie:
The funny back story is that it was actually leading its class and could have won if it didn't have to change film every 45 minutes. It made a large number of pit stops for film only, not tires or gas.
Last edited by jcsperson; Oct 4, 2013 at 04:40 PM.
Reason: red x
Wife and I went to see it last night. We both enjoyed it. Due to some of the reviews here I was expecting little to no racing footage, but I honestly thought it was sufficient footage to get the story told. Wife actually suggested seeing it again.
The missing spark plug thing kept bugging me though.
The OMP gloves in 1970 bothered me, along with rows not staggered for the starts.
The story was very compelling, and the casting was fabulous.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.