When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My friend has been eying this 82 w/ crossfire injection across the street (neighbors car) and wanted to buy and restore it and the guy wouldn't sell until these past two days he changed his mind and wants to get rid of it. So far what I know is that the car was in an excellent running condition until about 10 years ago where it was parked under a carport, covered and hasn't been driving since. According to my friend weatherstrips,paint,interior etc need care/replacement so what would be an ideal price to offer the seller and what advise would you guys give him?
I'll try to get more info on it and post it later.
A potential buyer needs to first determine if the frame is rusted out [or not]. If there is serious frame rust/damage, don't even consider buying it. If not...since it has been sitting for 10 years and probably won't start [probably shouldn't even try without doing some engine work]...make an offer of $2500-3000 to take it off their hands. This assumes that they have and can provide clear title to the car.
I am the original owner of an 82. Be very careful! If you don't know what you are looking for than it is cheaper to pay someone with knowledge to evaluate the car. I would look and see if there is an NCRS judge in your area that judges that C3 era. Or call or visit your local Corvette Clubs and ask who knows these cars. Also it is generally not good for a car to be parked outside and underneath a car cover. Here's why. The area will usually be in a moist environment that invites rust and or corrision. Stay away from any car with rust.
Good Luck!
Steve
i would also count on the brakes being bad .rubber hoses and belts .hows the interior?the body and paint can get verry expensive.ask the owner what he wants .if he is over 5 grand with any of those problems .find a differant one.
That could get expensive very fast... I would have the buyer take a look online to see what parts are going for, redoing an interior will get costly quick. A car sitting for 10 years outdoors will have lots of issues.
Mike's suggestion is pretty good. But, I don't think these folks have a clue as to the value of that car. In general, folks who have just let a car "go-to-pot" for many years think it's 'valuable' because it's a Corvette. If you explain the realities to them...that it may be badly damaged due to frame/birdcage rust, the engine could be locked up, there are lots of repairs that must be made before even trying to fire it up and that no one else is going to offer much for the car unless they do all that stuff first to prove that it is a functional vehicle...maybe they will realize that your offer is reasonable considering the circumstances. If they want to do the repair work to get it in good running shape, they should do so and then call you with a price when they are ready. At least, you should get the first 'right of purchase'.
Mike's suggestion is pretty good. But, I don't think these folks have a clue as to the value of that car. In general, folks who have just let a car "go-to-pot" for many years think it's 'valuable' because it's a Corvette. If you explain the realities to them...that it may be badly damaged due to frame/birdcage rust, the engine could be locked up, there are lots of repairs that must be made before even trying to fire it up and that no one else is going to offer much for the car unless they do all that stuff first to prove that it is a functional vehicle...maybe they will realize that your offer is reasonable considering the circumstances. If they want to do the repair work to get it in good running shape, they should do so and then call you with a price when they are ready. At least, you should get the first 'right of purchase'.
I'm relaying all the info to my friend and all the advise is appreciated guys. He's going to talk to the seller and he asked me if I can go with him and I said I'd love to so hopefully we can check it out these few days and I want to take some pictures of it as well.
The CrossFire induction design is certainly no more problematic than those of more modern vehicles. As long as the computer is functioning (and you can replace that, if necessary) and you have access to the internet, you can find any information and/or parts that you might need. Heck, that ECU even has diagnostic capabilities to help identify what is not working properly on the car. The sensors are simple and available, the TBI units can be rebuilt or replaced easily enough....where is the problem??? When it is running properly, it will get a heckuva lot better mileage than earlier C3's and it has an overdrive transmission with lockup, as well.
was waiting for some negative feedback. all the old guys in the shop remember when it came out, said they we junk and still are. i personally never owed a crossfire just going on other tech's experience,if you like it then good for you, a properly set up q-jet will get dam near the same mpg with o/d
when the cross-fire came out the old mechanics did not understand it .but they also bitched in 1975 when they did away with points .a cross- fire is just two throttle bodys .
agreed to a certain extent, hei is a excellant system compared to points, i would convert a pionts system to hei however not sure if i would go crossfire over q-jet. guess everyone has there preference. i am a no electronics kind of guy that is why my daily driver is still a obd1 '92 pickup and not have gone for a newer one. after seeing all the problems at work i prefer less headaches.
The CrossFire system was in many more GM vehicles than just Corvettes. It was just "new" and lots of carb/points guys balked because it had wires involved. I had a new '84 and never had one minute of problem with the engine/induction system. Like anything else...including the Q-Jet, which I like very much...age and wear eventually take a toll. But I don't know that a TBI induction system is any more problematic than a points/carb system. Start up [cold and hot] and idle performance are certainly better than any carb I've ever had; and mileage is better. Performance? Ehh...could be much better. But, if you want performance you wouldn't be considering any stock engine from 1975 up on the C3's. As always, it boils down to what the buyer wants and what he/she is comfortable with. I just don't think the CrossFire system is the POS that lots of folks make it out to be.
if you never had a problem with your crossfire system consider yourself one of the lucky few. there was a reason if was only used for 2 years in gm. it was also used in camaro and firebird, the pontiac guys said sales actually went down at dealer when crossfire came out, and the ones that did sell didnt leave the lot for long before problems occured. that being said every system has a downfall
if you never had a problem with your crossfire system consider yourself one of the lucky few. there was a reason if was only used for 2 years in gm. it was also used in camaro and firebird, the pontiac guys said sales actually went down at dealer when crossfire came out, and the ones that did sell didnt leave the lot for long before problems occured. that being said every system has a downfall
That is plain not true. The reason Crossfire was only 2 years (actually 3-'82, '83, '84) was that Tuned-Port was better, stronger, and got better mileage. Your '92 truck has basically the same system, just with 1 TB instead of 2. There are many happy Crossfire owners out there. People who don't like electronics just don't like electronics. I had a '95 Suburban with the last of the TBI engines and it was the greatest thing out there.... until I got my '01 Tahoe. The 5.3 LS based engine will run circles around the old 5.7 TBI engine-both mileage and power. The 5.7 Vortec that came between them was better than the TB, but not as good as an LS. I have over 200,000 miles on my Tahoe on the original transmission,water pump, starter, and it uses no oil between 4000 mile changes. The original alternator went 199,000 miles. You will be hard pressed to make these statements on any small-block.
the concept of crossfire and the tbi in my 92 maybe the same, but reliability, no sure, just a couple examples, the thottle bodys on crossfires (injectors) always had clogging problems and the caddy ecms were under constant replacement, just going on facts from back in the day. sure there were some vettes that were just fine. o and tahoes/suburbans all day will those things come in for trans issues, leaky water pumps and failed starters, those are our biggest money makers. it must me the luck of the draw on some
Last edited by straub18045; Apr 28, 2010 at 12:51 PM.