When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Is there a way to tell if a body panel has been replaced, assuming it wasn't spliced. Any typical give away, something the factory did differently?
I ask mainly out of curiousity. Wondering at times if the rear panel on mine was changed. The bonding strips are there, no splices or other suspicious markings.
Compare the areas in question on both sides of the car. If the panel was damaged enough to warrant replacement, the inner suppports and splash shields likely needed repair as well. Since these areas do not show from the outside, shops might cut corners a bit on the cosmetics here and that will be the "tell".
Compare the areas in question on both sides of the car. If the panel was damaged enough to warrant replacement, the inner suppports and splash shields likely needed repair as well. Since these areas do not show from the outside, shops might cut corners a bit on the cosmetics here and that will be the "tell".
The car is in winter storage right now (Northeast). I expect to be getting it back in a few weeks. I'll take a close look though I don't recall seeing anything unusual in that area.
Hi BB,
SOME of the body panels had mfg's labels on them which would sure be a clue to originality.
Here's a picture of a label on the underside of the hood surround in the left wheel well. The date is 1-71, the first week of 71. I don't know why there are 2 labels. They are molded as part of the panel, not stuck on.
The body tub of my 71 has the same label dated 36-70.
Also, originally the areas where bonding strips were going to be used were 'roughed-up' (it almost looks like sand blasted) in order to increase adhesion. I'd look for signs of that too.
Some original bonding strips had numbers molded in to them. I'll get a picture.
Good Luck!
Regards,
Alan
Hi BB,
I think it is possible to determine a no hit body.
I do believe it's much easier to tell with an unpainted car. I 'think' I can see a difference in the bonding material used in St.Louis compared to what is used today.
The jig assembled front clips are really good, but I'd think it would be difficult to put a rear clip together without leaving a sign.
Regards,
Alan
Hi BB,
I think it is possible to determine a no hit body.
I do believe it's much easier to tell with an unpainted car. I 'think' I can see a difference in the bonding material used in St.Louis compared to what is used today.
The jig assembled front clips are really good, but I'd think it would be difficult to put a rear clip together without leaving a sign.
Regards,
Alan
Hi Alan,
I agree, if the paint were stripped to bare glass it would expose most repairs.
Mine has never been hit since I've owned it, 28 years now. Question in my mind is what may have been done to it by past owners. Materials used would have been from the 70's to very early 80's.
Good looking body in those photos. I assume those are earlier pictures of yours. Thanks for sharing your photos, this thread and many before. They're quite interesting, helpful.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time