C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Info on 68' vettes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2011, 03:20 PM
  #21  
Manuel Azevedo
Burning Brakes
 
Manuel Azevedo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Concord Calif
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

All the C3's are cool cars! Pick the one that looks the best to you and is the best condition you can afford.
I never could understand somes opinions of 68's, Why in the world would you want your year car to be the same as another year car?!!! You want an early VW or do you want a ___year Corvette? Just my .50cents!!!!
Old 06-28-2011, 09:20 PM
  #22  
whitehause
Pro
 
whitehause's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Fleetwood PA
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I own 2 68's (a BB and a SB ) Were there improvements in 69....sure....where there one year only parts....sure. If you are looking to build a top flight, Blom gold car, 68 would be the most costly. If your looking for an early C3 with unique features(dash ignition switch, door buttons, good power in the motors) then go for it. 68 or 69 can't go wrong!
Old 06-28-2011, 09:42 PM
  #23  
68sbcoupe
Instructor
 
68sbcoupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2011
Location: Litchfield CT
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 68

I own my third 68 right now. I've owned 3 68's, 2 69's, 2 65's, 1 64, 1 70, 1 98. They all have their plusses and minuses.

As some have advised, buy the best one you can afford. Avoid highly modified cars. Avoid "project" cars. DON'T buy the first one you look at, unless you look at several others, then go back. NEVER buy one without seeing it yourself. Best is to bring a friend who really knows Corvettes. Meaning, one who can recognize repaired damage, rusting symptoms, and "Built by Bubba" work.

Corvettes have improved every year since 1953. So a 68 is 15 steps up the evolutionary trail from a 53. And a 2011 Vette 43 steps over a 68. So a 69 would be 42 steps up the trail. Big deal.

If you like a particular 68, buy it. Life is short. Just make sure you drive it. I read every day posts from guys who have cars they drive 100 miles a year. My car has only 112,000 miles on it. Over 43 years. That's 3000 miles a year.

2 cents from an old guy.
Old 07-07-2011, 02:02 PM
  #24  
pologreen1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
pologreen1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,974
Received 260 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

Thanks guys. I just wanted to make sure there was nothing major wrong with a '68. I see no problems with a getting after reading this. I knew about the obvious like door handles, ignition switch, etc, but nothing serious.

Thanks
Old 07-07-2011, 03:39 PM
  #25  
dkeith
Instructor
 
dkeith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Hattiesburg MS
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Can't go wrong with a chrome bumper C3. I have owned a 68, 69 and 72........a 68 is in my garage now. Remember every C3 after 68 is only a version of the original.
Old 07-07-2011, 04:47 PM
  #26  
Deacon Don
Racer
 
Deacon Don's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: Vilonia Arkansas
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dkeith
Can't go wrong with a chrome bumper C3. I have owned a 68, 69 and 72........a 68 is in my garage now. Remember every C3 after 68 is only a version of the original.
...and the '72 is the last, and best, version of the chrome bumper C3's. Sorry...couldn't resist! Just joking you know, sort of...
Old 07-07-2011, 10:15 PM
  #27  
427SIXPACK
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
427SIXPACK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND
Posts: 5,357
Received 468 Likes on 276 Posts
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified

Default

Originally Posted by pologreen1
I am interested in getting a 68' vette and people are saying that I should look for 69' or newer. I would like to know the facts rather than opinions to determine if it is worth canceling the car off my list.

What are the real differences or draw backs about a 68'?

Any info would be helpful, thanks


WHY ??????

It's obvious your talking to the W R O N G people !!!!
Old 07-07-2011, 10:34 PM
  #28  
Procrastination Racing
Le Mans Master
 
Procrastination Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Ocala FL
Posts: 6,249
Received 251 Likes on 174 Posts

Default

If you are tall, and most of your height is from your hips to your head, you might find the '69 and later roomier because the seat bottoms are higher in a '68.

If you are built like Conan (the barbarian, not the TV night show guy), the tighter door panels in a '68 can bother you. '69 up had more shoulder room.
Old 07-08-2011, 12:28 AM
  #29  
pologreen1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
pologreen1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,974
Received 260 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Procrastination Racing
If you are tall, and most of your height is from your hips to your head, you might find the '69 and later roomier because the seat bottoms are higher in a '68.

If you are built like Conan (the barbarian, not the TV night show guy), the tighter door panels in a '68 can bother you. '69 up had more shoulder room.
That is the best info , thanks. That would be a concern.
Old 07-08-2011, 07:06 AM
  #30  
1-2-b-67L89
Melting Slicks
 
1-2-b-67L89's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: York PA
Posts: 2,529
Received 67 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beefstick1
I love my 68 tri-power BB and would not trade it for any other. The one year only parts make it unique. The door handles and back up lights are very cool. If you like black, there were only 708 made. Also it is the year that they made twice as many convertibles as coupes.
Today other than some parts availability (for restoration) its no problem so if you desire a 68 go for it. Personally, I liked the idea of a 68 to go with our 67 vette and also with our 68 Z/28. Very blessed to be able to do but it was what I desired and glad I joined the ranks.
Good luck,

Old 07-08-2011, 07:41 AM
  #31  
Paul Workman
Le Mans Master
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes on 395 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Corey_68
Only people that well tell you pass on a '68 typically never owned one or owned a poor example of one. The '68 in no more inferior in quality than any other C3.
Not pickin a fight, but some would beg to differ - note the add info for the 69!!.

http://www.web-cars.com/corvette/1969.php

My wife's 69 was "rode hard and put away wet" by previous owner(s), that and time and the elements tend to blur any minor manufacturing anomolies associated with a first year model, i.e. the 68. I wouldn't hesitate to by one.

One thing I do like about the 70s+ is the fender flairs that were added. They go a long way toward preventing road debris from chipping the fenders. And, wider tires are possible w/o flinging muck on the paint - another plus for 70+ body panels, IMO.

P.
Old 07-08-2011, 05:22 PM
  #32  
427SIXPACK
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
427SIXPACK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND
Posts: 5,357
Received 468 Likes on 276 Posts
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified

Default

Originally Posted by 1-2-b-67L89
Today other than some parts availability (for restoration) its no problem so if you desire a 68 go for it. Personally, I liked the idea of a 68 to go with our 67 vette and also with our 68 Z/28. Very blessed to be able to do but it was what I desired and glad I joined the ranks.
Good luck,


Love that interior color !!!
Old 07-08-2011, 05:46 PM
  #33  
TOM65 L76 96 LT1
Burning Brakes
 
TOM65 L76 96 LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: Apple Valley Minnesota
Posts: 1,202
Received 116 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 427SIXPACK

Love that interior color !!!
Me to, what a great looking color combo.
Old 07-08-2011, 06:14 PM
  #34  
AWilson
Drifting
 
AWilson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Schaumburg (Chicago) Illinois
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by whitehause
I own 2 68's (a BB and a SB ) Were there improvements in 69....sure....where there one year only parts....sure. If you are looking to build a top flight, Blom gold car, 68 would be the most costly. If your looking for an early C3 with unique features(dash ignition switch, door buttons, good power in the motors) then go for it. 68 or 69 can't go wrong!
This is good advice. My 68 has a lot of original parts that came with it or 68 parts I found over time. And a lot of catalog house parts and even some 69 parts. But it is going to be beautiful and the uniqueness of 68 makes it a little more satisfying. If you watch the forum almost everything you need will eventually come up. You just have to snap them up. You can't beat the push button locks and the dash ignition.
Old 07-09-2011, 04:17 PM
  #35  
Corey_68
Team Owner
 
Corey_68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 34,054
Received 392 Likes on 238 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Paul Workman
Not pickin a fight, but some would beg to differ - note the add info for the 69!!.

http://www.web-cars.com/corvette/1969.php

My wife's 69 was "rode hard and put away wet" by previous owner(s), that and time and the elements tend to blur any minor manufacturing anomolies associated with a first year model, i.e. the 68. I wouldn't hesitate to by one.

One thing I do like about the 70s+ is the fender flairs that were added. They go a long way toward preventing road debris from chipping the fenders. And, wider tires are possible w/o flinging muck on the paint - another plus for 70+ body panels, IMO.

P.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but growing up a son of on owner of a classic corvette restoration shop I know firsthand 69+ are NOT leaps and bounds better than the '68's like many try to portray.



Quick Reply: Info on 68' vettes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.