When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Downtown Annapolis, MD. The Future is where we all have to live. Let's not screw it up.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11
Originally Posted by Mike Ward
Although it was brilliant marketing, I always wondered why Sunoco developed fuels that no production car ever actually needed. Or maybe I just answered my own question.
Mike,
My first REAL job was at a Sunoco station in '76.
The lowest grade and highest grade fuels were actually mixed by valves in the pump to formulate the mid grades. There were like 6 choices?
Higher octant does ZERO to "clean" anything ever. If you run too high of octane just because, it will carbon up, too low and it will predetonate and run lean. Most stock lower compression C3s should run just fine on 87. If you are forced to use high octane be sure to run Seafoam or its equivelant periodically to keep carbon buildup down. Ocatne is the number that tells you at what point under pressure the fuel will spontaneouly ignite. The higher the compression the higher the octane to keep predetonation away. Timing plays a part as well in the equation. I run 87 no Ethanol fuel.
I'm interested in knowing what "burning clean" means? Is the alternative to that [meaning, using lower octane fuel] "burning dirty"? And, if so, what gets 'dirty'?
P.S. My L-48 engine has 209K miles on it. As far as I know, it has never seen anything but "regular" fuel; the owner's manual recommends 'regular unleaded fuel', anyway. When I pulled the heads for a [lightly] blown head gasket 2 years ago, the pistons were marked for .040"-over and there was almost no ridge at the top of the cylinder walls. I use the GM recommended plugs and they show just a light-tan color when I check them. So, why do I 'need' premium gas?
Last edited by 7T1vette; May 12, 2012 at 06:59 PM.
Higher octant does ZERO to "clean" anything ever. If you run too high of octane just because, it will carbon up, too low and it will predetonate and run lean. Most stock lower compression C3s should run just fine on 87. If you are forced to use high octane be sure to run Seafoam or its equivelant periodically to keep carbon buildup down. Ocatne is the number that tells you at what point under pressure the fuel will spontaneouly ignite. The higher the compression the higher the octane to keep predetonation away. Timing plays a part as well in the equation. I run 87 no Ethanol fuel.
Congratulations, that's the most compacted and concentrated version of 'gasoline myths' I've ever seen.
XCCTER, I worked at my buddies Sunoco station for 3 1/2 months and he showed me that they had only two tanks of fuel ( one 260 tank and one 180 I believe) and two pumps, one for each tank. That is how the fuel was mixed, by the two pumps speed. No valves were involved. Actually, it was two pumps in each "pump" with the dispensing hose.
Last edited by loup68; May 13, 2012 at 03:55 PM.
Reason: added text.
my 68 owners manual says premium so 93 it is. I had to drain a tank on my airplane a few months ago so i filled the vette up with 100LL it never ran better.
Higher octant does ZERO to "clean" anything ever. If you run too high of octane just because, it will carbon up, too low and it will predetonate and run lean. Most stock lower compression C3s should run just fine on 87. If you are forced to use high octane be sure to run Seafoam or its equivelant periodically to keep carbon buildup down. Ocatne is the number that tells you at what point under pressure the fuel will spontaneouly ignite. The higher the compression the higher the octane to keep predetonation away. Timing plays a part as well in the equation. I run 87 no Ethanol fuel.
Precisely! Which is why I only run Kosher fuels. (tongue firmly in cheek)
.
Last edited by RobbSalzmann; Jun 15, 2012 at 07:29 PM.
Better than having the engine knock and chug itself apart!
Old engines do NOT like this new stuff.
If you are concerned about $0.40 install a new crate engine built for today's fuels.
My engines have run just fine on 10% ethanol for over 30 years. My 75 spent its entire life in my area and started getting 10% ethanol in the LATE 70s and never had a single issue with it. Ethanol is not some new phenomenon sweeping the country and killing engines....it's been the only choice in some emission controlled areas for DECADES.
I've also ran my air cooled 66 Corvair for decades off of it as well as my 1962 Olds with its original 394 Ultra High Compression rocket engine. Neither had any issues with knocking or chugging.
Even the rancid smelling oxygenated gas that appeared in my area in the mid 90s has never given me a single issue in anything from my big V8s to my weed-eater engine.
When traveling well out of my area where ethanol free gas is available, the only difference I notice is a slight increase in mileage.
Better than having the engine knock and chug itself apart!
Old engines do NOT like this new stuff.
If you are concerned about $0.40 install a new crate engine built for today's fuels.
I'm not saying its too expensive to afford or anything, I was just commenting. All gas is too expensive...lol I'm really hoping the electric car infrastructure or hydrogen engines pull through
My engines have run just fine on 10% ethanol for over 30 years. My 75 spent its entire life in my area and started getting 10% ethanol in the LATE 70s and never had a single issue with it. Ethanol is not some new phenomenon sweeping the country and killing engines....it's been the only choice in some emission controlled areas for DECADES.
I've also ran my air cooled 66 Corvair for decades off of it as well as my 1962 Olds with its original 394 Ultra High Compression rocket engine. Neither had any issues with knocking or chugging.
Even the rancid smelling oxygenated gas that appeared in my area in the mid 90s has never given me a single issue in anything from my big V8s to my weed-eater engine.
When traveling well out of my area where ethanol free gas is available, the only difference I notice is a slight increase in mileage.
Although I can't say I've seen a definite change in mileage- the 3% difference between E10 and pure gas is pretty hard to track reliably.
We've had E10 gas here for at least 20 years, other parts of Canada and the US have had it for 30. My toys all sit for six months a year over the winter with E10 in the tanks and NO stabilizer. No problems at all. None.
The big 3 are all working on engines that run better with ethanol, and they are FINALLY really getting here. But for older cars? There is very little to suggest it's good for them.
Places like Sears are actually not covering damage to the fuel systems of their gas-powered tools due to the number of problems.
The manual suggests 90 for my car, if I recall correctly. Everything here is either 89 or 91, so I run the 91. And yes, I understand that the evolution of fuel over the past 20 years means that an 89 octane is less likely to diesel, etc, but eh. I can afford $100 a year for the peace of mind that there are no subsonic knocks screwing with my timing.