‘70 LT-1 with PS
Mar 16, 2019 | 08:30 AM
Thread Starter
Instructor
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 234
Likes: 57
‘70 LT-1 with PS
Is it possible for a ‘70 LT-1 to have PS that has a VIN with the last four of 2018? Seems a little early in that production year to have PS. My impression is that PS wasn’t available until late ‘70. 2018 indicates an early production in that year. Correct?
Mar 16, 2019 | 09:42 AM
Safety Car
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,454
Likes: 328
From: Indy Indiana
is it 12018 or 02018? big difference of early vs late...
Mar 16, 2019 | 11:07 AM
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 23,363
Likes: 1,059
From: Virginia USA
I thought A/C was the belt driven option that was not available with the LT1 (until 1972) because it threw the belt.
Mar 16, 2019 | 11:28 AM
Safety Car
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 367
From: PHOENIX AZ. WHAT A MAN WON"T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE
Quote:
Originally Posted by
theandies
I thought A/C was the belt driven option that was not available with the LT1 (until 1972) because it threw the belt.
He is asking about PS not AC. PS was offered late production in 1970 but not AC. Oil pan changed to a 5 QT from a 6QT to allow for PS.
Mar 16, 2019 | 11:33 AM
Thread Starter
Instructor
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 234
Likes: 57
Mar 16, 2019 | 12:55 PM
Drifting
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bearcatfan9
02108
Jan 28 car. no PS imo
Mar 16, 2019 | 12:59 PM
Burning Brakes
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 978
Likes: 254
From: Bethlehem, PA
No P/S from the factory with the CTU stamped engine which had the "6 qt" oil pan.
CTK stamped engines showed up in late March or so. March production is vin 5184-7977, so maybe P/S started around car 7000.
CTK engines along with the rest of the 350's had the "5 qt" oil pan which allowed for the P/S steering linkage.
It is possible that an owner of an early CTU car added P/S along with changing the pan, But if there is documentation, like a tank sticker, that says P/S, beware!
So No P/S from the factory with CTU and CTK may or may not have P/S.
Mar 16, 2019 | 01:11 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 23,363
Likes: 1,059
From: Virginia USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kenba
He is asking about PS not AC. PS was offered late production in 1970 but not AC. Oil pan changed to a 5 QT from a 6QT to allow for PS.
Thats what I meant.
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor
Joe Kucinski
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!
Joe Kucinski
Mar 16, 2019 | 11:57 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 37,637
Likes: 3,114
From: Crossville TN
R..I..G..H..T.... You meant P/S....and it was power steering that threw the belts.....
Mar 18, 2019 | 10:03 AM
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 23,363
Likes: 1,059
From: Virginia USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
7T1vette
R..I..G..H..T.... You meant P/S....and it was power steering that threw the belts.....
Dude, What's your problem. I suggest you read my post again. Here I'll quote it for you:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
theandies
I thought A/C was the belt driven option that was not available with the LT1 (until 1972) because it threw the belt .
Reading and reading comprehension are two different things.
Mar 18, 2019 | 01:31 PM
Drifting
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 779
From: Persona Non Grata
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Quote:
Originally Posted by
theandies
Dude, What's your problem. I suggest you read my post again. Here I'll quote it for you:
Reading and reading comprehension are two different things.
Some are troubled by a lack of a sense of humo(u)r.
Mar 18, 2019 | 10:46 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 37,637
Likes: 3,114
From: Crossville TN
Mar 19, 2019 | 12:18 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 23,363
Likes: 1,059
From: Virginia USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dirty Dalton
Some are troubled by a lack of a sense of humo(u)r.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
7T1vette
Sadly, it is so....
No, I was called out being wrong and I pointed out that I wasn't wrong with what I said. No Humo(u)r needed.......................
Mar 19, 2019 | 02:41 PM
Drifting
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 779
From: Persona Non Grata
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Sorry, Sir, it wasn't your sense of humo(u)r that I questioned.