When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm replacing the MC and proportioning valve on a 68. The 68 proportioning valve has 2 inputs, 2 outputs. One output for the rear, one for the front. The new valve has 2 seperate ports for the front, and still just one for the rears. Should I plug one of the ports for the front and just use the existing line, or make 2 seperate lines for the front left, front right?
Is is designed to have separate outlet fittings for left and right in front. That is to eliminate a single crossing line for the full width. Not sure whether that is for safety in some regard or strictly for cost savings. Maybe both....
Yes, I have seen these. I bought a master cylinder with the proportioning valve included. Just wondering what difference it might make to install the new style.
This valve was a GM "corporate" design and was used on a multitude of platforms. Depending on where the valve got mounted, the 2nd angled front outlet port may not be used. When in OE production, the port just didn't get machined, but to make it "universal", the aftermarket just plugs it on those applications that don't use it.
This valve was a GM "corporate" design and was used on a multitude of platforms. Depending on where the valve got mounted, the 2nd angled front outlet port may not be used. When in OE production, the port just didn't get machined, but to make it "universal", the aftermarket just plugs it on those applications that don't use it.
Thank you. That's what I was hoping for. I did see the other design that had the angle part,, and no exit port. I will get a plug... This way I can install it with what ever port that works the best. I'm not sure what the deal is, but it was hard to find a disc/disc Master cylinder and prop valve.