Comp Cam XE262

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 29, 2006 | 12:48 PM

#21

tapio

Racer

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 379

Likes: 0

From: Helsinki

Quote:

Originally Posted by lars

I installed that cam in a 327 I built for a friend of mine's wife's Camaro. It's a very mild cam, it idles about like a stock cam, and makes the car very easy to drive. It did produce a noticable performance improvement over stock using the stock heads - it has excellent low-rpm torque and makes the car feel strong through the mid-range. It flattens out over 5000 rpm.

I agree.

Mar 29, 2006 | 12:53 PM

#22

Kid Vette

Melting Slicks

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 2,802

Likes: 241

From: Niles, MI

Here's an interesting comparison of the XE262 to the XE268. Dyno sheets are from Comp Cams web site.

The XE 262 actually produces slightly more HP and torque than the XE 268 with this engine setup.

Mar 29, 2006 | 01:01 PM

#23

lars

Tech Contributor

Joined: Aug 1999

Posts: 14,379

Likes: 6,390

From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado

CompCams used Dart heads and headers on their test mule engine. This makes a huge difference over the stock setup.

Mar 29, 2006 | 01:53 PM

#24

bobs77vet

Race Director

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 11,874

Likes: 263

From: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod

can't argue with those graphs.....makes you wonder why someone would choose the 268.....ooops that was me......i think that the difference is so slight in the grinds that on either side of any cam the next choice is very similar....an i do like the 268 so looks like the 262 will work well for you if you want to be around 350hp

Mar 29, 2006 | 06:27 PM

#25

marshrat99

Melting Slicks

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 2,135

Likes: 2

From: Dayton Oh

Quote:

Originally Posted by VintageMuscle

Is that with iron heads? What octane fuel is required? and does it take all the timing?

The heads are iron. They're Dart Iron Eagles.

I've only run 93 and suspect that 87 or 89 might be a problem. One time I did put a couple of gallons of 89 in, just enough to get me from one service station to another since the first was out of premium but only had to go 4-5 blocks.

My timing is standard Lars. 36* all in by 2,500 RPM.

Last edited by marshrat99; Mar 29, 2006 at 06:30 PM.

Mar 30, 2006 | 09:34 AM

#26

73jst4fun

Drifting

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 1,951

Likes: 1

From: Shore NJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobs77vet

Bob, That's what sold me on using that cam also the Comp Cams graphs, we were surprised with the low numbers, that's why I'm switching Bob, disapointed with the performance, great mild cam for the street though, no lope smooth idle, low end and mid range torque pretty good, after that it falls off...youv'e seem my 73 Bob, next 2-3 weeks new engine will be installed....

Mar 30, 2006 | 09:36 PM

#27

Taijutsu

Drifting

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 1,743

Likes: 37

From: Stockton Ca

First Engine

I drove my 74 w/M21, 327 too much cam, fulie heads, stk intake and redone q jet. After 95K it was time for rebuild. TFS heads, 650 Demon vs, 218-224 HR + 1.6 RRs = .532 I / .539 E. Went to dyno w/stk duals dented and flattened. 280 RWHP 315 RWTQ Headers and 2.5 ex should have me in the 12 sec 20 mpg club. The 3:55s and M21 make it way tall off the line. I love the BB mid range that squirts me through traffic. The catalog lists this as the most cam that can be run w/stk converter. A 5 sp will change my outlook I'm sure. JMHO

Rick