When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Whats the relationship between them? I came across a post that said plug gap should be opened up for high output coils. I have an Accel 45,000 volt coil. What should I gap the plugs at? I realize there's no performance gain with that coil but its all the local parts store had in stock.
The larger the gap, the more 'spark' to fire off the cylinder. The bigger the coil, the larger gap the spark can jump. So, you want as large a gap as you can get....but you have to make sure the coil can continuously supply that amount of energy AND the it will ALWAYS do so (no misses).
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by jim2527
Whats the relationship between them? I came across a post that said plug gap should be opened up for high output coils. I have an Accel 45,000 volt coil. What should I gap the plugs at? I realize there's no performance gain with that coil but its all the local parts store had in stock.
'70 350..mostly stock.
Thanks,
Jim
The 45kV rating is for the coil dielectric breakdown voltage. It has nothing to do with the plug gap voltage requirements, nor the most important item, coil energy storage value (dependent upon inductance, resistance, dwell time, primary current, etc, etc). Unless you know the relative energy storage values of this setup versus your stock setup, you're just flipping a coin to decide the gap change. Leave the plugs at .035 and worry about more important things.
A plug will fire as soon as enough potential energy has built up in the coil to 'jump the gap', even if that's a lowly 5-10Kv. The spark does not wait until the coil has built up it's maximum potential of 45kv or whatever it's rated at.
Opening the gap may increase the actual discharge voltage slightly, but so what- makes no difference in performance.
It's simple physics that it takes a given level of energy [voltage] to jump a specific gap (assuming other environmental factors are equal). The larger the gap, the larger the voltage required to jump it. If there was no benefit to be gained by increasing the plug gap along with higher potential coil(s), why would every manufacturer today choose to do so? {Maybe....they just want to put costlier components in your car for no good reason?}
It's simple physics that it takes a given level of energy [voltage] to jump a specific gap (assuming other environmental factors are equal). The larger the gap, the larger the voltage required to jump it. If there was no benefit to be gained by increasing the plug gap along with higher potential coil(s), why would every manufacturer today choose to do so? {Maybe....they just want to put costlier components in your car for no good reason?}
I didnt see anyone mention there was no benefit....there may be a negligable performance benefit but other benefits that increased gaps and the resultant increased energy of the spark may include but not be limited to...
increased resistance to fouling
increased resistance to deposit build up and thus bridging
also I'm not sure but I do believe the Hei spark is of slightly longer duration than a points coil.. as such it would need a more powerful coil i would imagine.. and a longer duration spark is of some advantage IIRC.
I was referring to the "...makes no difference in performance." comment from Brother Ward. A 'hotter' spark [or hotter spark "potential"] will provide more assurance that a cylinder will fire and that it will not foul. 'Performance' isn't only measured in HP/torque; sometimes reliability of the cylinders firing properly is a 'performance' asset.
I didnt see anyone mention there was no benefit....there may be a negligable performance benefit but other benefits that increased gaps and the resultant increased energy of the spark may include but not be limited to...
increased resistance to fouling
increased resistance to deposit build up and thus bridging
You'd be correct if a given engine suffered such problems- but a better course would be to cure the root cause of the fouling and build ups.
Modern cars use 'hotter' coils to help fire extremely lean mixtures, something that didn't exist in the days of early C3s.
The two main reasons GM came out with HEI was to deal with the above and to stay 'in tune' for a much longer period as mandated by federal regulations.
Putting a hotter coil on an engine that runs OK with a standard coil will gain nothing, same as with electronic ignition kits.
Aren't the advantages of an improved HEI module and coil really only applicable to the upper RPM ranges where the coil is charging/discharging very rapidly?
Aren't the advantages of an improved HEI module and coil really only applicable to the upper RPM ranges where the coil is charging/discharging very rapidly?
True enough, but if the stock coil reliably 'lights the fire' -as they've been proven to do for many decades- there's no additional gains to be had.
You've got have an initial problem for a 'fix' to be applicable.
Large plug gaps KILL spark plug wires. The best figure to run is around 0.040" or 1mm of plug gap to save your plug wires. GM had a bad expirience with the HEI in the 1970's running a 0.060" plug gap and later backed down the figure to 0.040-0.045" on all its manuals.
I started a thread in regards to reading my plugs and the consensus was I was running rich but they weren't fouled. The remaining 5 plugs looked the same if not better than the 3 I pulled.
I installed AC R45's which are similar in heat range to the Champion RJ12YC's I pulled out and gapped them .040 based on this thread. I also turned in the idle mixture screws 1/4 of a turn.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by 7T1vette
It's simple physics that it takes a given level of energy [voltage] to jump a specific gap (assuming other environmental factors are equal). The larger the gap, the larger the voltage required to jump it. If there was no benefit to be gained by increasing the plug gap along with higher potential coil(s), why would every manufacturer today choose to do so? {Maybe....they just want to put costlier components in your car for no good reason?}
Not trying to cause any friction here, but there's a couple things here that need clarification. Energy and voltage are two different things. When you increase the gap, an increase of voltage is required. As there is no free lunch in physics, something must be sacrificed to allow the increased voltage to happen. The usual sacrifice is spark "burn time". A larger gap will reduce the duration of the spark. Regarding "high potential coils", we only know that the coil mentioned previously is a higher dielectric breakdown coil. It does not necessarily have any more energy capability than a stock coil. A 45kV breakdown rating is good for marketing usage, but rarely is a coil required to output more than 10-30kV.
Large plug gaps KILL spark plug wires. The best figure to run is around 0.040" or 1mm of plug gap to save your plug wires. GM had a bad expirience with the HEI in the 1970's running a 0.060" plug gap and later backed down the figure to 0.040-0.045" on all its manuals.
I replaced a factory setup in a 75 jeep with a straight six with an HEI conversion. New wires for the HEI and set the plug gap to .045. I noticed more power through the entire RPM range. I dont want to argue with anyone, maybee the old coil was weak? But that is my experience.