When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Interesting thread...my BB engine is in the shop right now with a wiped out cam lob. It will be interesting to find out what lob or cylinder it is. The cam that was in there was some type of Comp Cam.
I'm going back with a roller setup. My engine has all original parts and would still be running if the PO has not swapped the cam out. My builder is recommending a Comp Cam for replacement, we'll see!
Kevin
One of the issues with 'replacement' of flat tappet cams with roller items I believe could be excessive 'lift' (certainly if planning to use existing valve/spring set-ups) - most of the 'hotter' solid roller cams seem to have far higher lift pro-rata than their flat tappet equivalents - lower lift options seem to be limited.
One of the issues with 'replacement' of flat tappet cams with roller items I believe could be excessive 'lift' (certainly if planning to use existing valve/spring set-ups) - most of the 'hotter' solid roller cams seem to have far higher lift pro-rata than their flat tappet equivalents - lower lift options seem to be limited.
Im sure you could have a custom cam ground with less lift, but that kills one of the benefits of a roller cam.
Im sure you could have a custom cam ground with less lift, but that kills one of the benefits of a roller cam.
Know what you mean - but higher lift is surely only a benefit if your heads can flow anything additional from the extra lift - heads on mine are Brodix Race Rites on 489 cu in - factory quoted intake flow @ .500" lift = 314 cfm - .600" lift = 334 cfm - .650" lift = 336 cfm - .700" lift = 340 cfm. As you can see there is little benefit in going above .600" lift. I see the roller advantage in being able to use far more aggressive opening and closing ramps on the cam and maximising flow benefits at a lower lift (valve overlap permitting). It seems that only Crower offer as stock 'street' solid roller cams with lower lifts.
Know what you mean - but higher lift is surely only a benefit if your heads can flow anything additional from the extra lift - heads on mine are Brodix Race Rites on 489 cu in - factory quoted intake flow @ .500" lift = 314 cfm - .600" lift = 334 cfm - .650" lift = 336 cfm - .700" lift = 340 cfm. As you can see there is little benefit in going above .600" lift. I see the roller advantage in being able to use far more aggressive opening and closing ramps on the cam and maximising flow benefits at a lower lift (valve overlap permitting). It seems that only Crower offer as stock 'street' solid roller cams with lower lifts.
Even if your head doesn't flow anything more from .600'' to .700'' taking to .700'' keeps it at max flow for that much longer. The fear of a wiped lobe is greatly diminished with a roller and in my opinion well worth the extra money alone, add the performance benefits and it's a no brainer( speaking in terms of my lack there of)in my books. I am interested in the cam specs, If I had to run a flat tappet again for some reason, I'd go billet core.
Last edited by bluedawg; Sep 2, 2013 at 02:16 PM.
Reason: shittty spelling and third grade punctuation.
Comp Cam kit 268H High Energy was used in his motor.When I was researching for my new roller cam,found out not all cams are created equal.Before you purchase find out if the cam is a billet core or not.My Crane Cam was ground on a billet core with pressed on iron dist gear.in this pic you can see the difference....
[IMG][/IMG]
Comp Cam kit 268H High Energy was used in his motor.When I was researching for my new roller cam,found out not all cams are created equal.Before you purchase find out if the cam is a billet core or not.My Crane Cam was ground on a billet core with pressed on iron dist gear.in this pic you can see the difference....
[IMG][/IMG]
Er, not trying to be funny but can't see dissy gear?
Here you go..[IMG][/IMG]
No special dist gear needed.Need to use a different fuel pump pushrod rod,I'm using a Howards polymer rod.Don't like the bronze tip or roller type.
[IMG][/IMG]
Billet core with press-on cast iron dizzy gear is the way to go. Most off-the-shelf comp cams are NOT billet core. Lunati uses billet cores on their roller Voodoo line. I have the Voodoo 231/239 h-roller in my 454 and it's a sweet cam.
268H, eh? Damn, that blows my theory right out of the water. I had been starting to notice that almost all of the wiped cam sob stories involve cams with very high hydraulic intensity, like the Xtreme energy cams. But the 268H is fairly mild.
isn't it strange, now we are finding out that even roller cams benefit from zink in the oil, and a member here has insisted it isn't needed. i agree with the necessity of proper installation practice and proper break in. it seems even then there are no guarantees. i feel bad for the o.p it is disheartening to have to redo something that both planning and execution take such time.
Enyone ever have a bad ROLLER cam, ??? I have, and to boot the engine would smooth out just fine along about 1200 rpm, but the idle at 800 rpm was ragged as a doll, BUT every once in a while the idle would smooth out and be fine.....it was very erratic in the acting up, this went on for years, ME going nutz with the injectors, HEI, computer, chips, and of course the computer looked good in all aspects....this drove me krazy, I got another stock L98 cam from a friend, and changed it out more for the economy than anything......upon pulling the ZZ9 TPIS cam out of the engine, I was shocked to see all the destruction on 1/2 the lobes, I examined the roller lifters really close, and they were perfect, smooth all over looked new.....the Cloys double roller chain was perfect too, changing the cam solved all the ragged intermittent idle problems....
so never buy anything from TPIS, they located in Chaska Minn.
I would not be too surprised to see other guys with defective lobes on roller cams too, somehow that junk gets sent out of some shops.....
the lobs looked as if the steel had delaminated or something, looked like it had pits all over, also....
268H, eh? Damn, that blows my theory right out of the water. I had been starting to notice that almost all of the wiped cam sob stories involve cams with very high hydraulic intensity, like the Xtreme energy cams. But the 268H is fairly mild.
Scott
I could be wrong here Scott, but the 268 doesnt have the lift that we been seeing in flattapet cams failures, but i think most BBC's run 1.7 to 1 rockers which would add to the stress on the lobe.
Never heard of a flat tappet cam being ground on a billet core.
If you can order a billet core for a roller, couldnt you order one for a flat tappet? Personaly id go roller, but if some circumstance dictated a flat tappet cam..
If you can order a billet core for a roller, couldnt you order one for a flat tappet? Personaly id go roller, but if some circumstance dictated a flat tappet cam..
No, a billet core would trash flat tappet lifters. But there is a premium flat tappet core. P55 or something like that? I forget the name of it.