400 ci
This is strange. If you go to this site and scroll down to Pro-filer there are a variety of flow testing on the 195 and the 210. Looks to me like the 195 out of the box numbers are higher or at least comparable to the out of the box 210's even when the testing is done by the same person. Might want to check other sources and call profiler but if this is the case there is 0 advantage to the 210 vs 195. Flow is flow and better flow through a smaller port is a win win.
This wouldnt have happened if only you'd payed attention!
It's not that I didn't pay attn, more like tunnel vision, was bent on 64-5 cc heads.





http://www.castheads.com/removable_cylinders.php










http://www.crower.com/camshafts/chev...-cam-9825.html
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/lu...make/chevrolet
Put a 2400 stall convertor in it either way. It will help a lot if your over 10 to 1 with a 3.55 gear.
Run your calcs with these cams and this gasket.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cg...-size/6-6l-400
I would probably go with the Crower.
Last edited by 63mako; Mar 21, 2014 at 12:50 AM.
It depends on the bore size they have. It really makes a negligible difference on the results 4.060 to 4.155. Here is a chart with back to back tests.
http://www.castheads.com/removable_cylinders.php
Last edited by bluedawg; Mar 21, 2014 at 02:14 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
In simple terms, it is how hard you suck on the port. Think about sucking on a straw. The harder you suck, the more air you pull through it. So 10 inches of water (small flow bench), light sucking. And 28 inches would be hard sucking.

Gets expensive fast, but this is $1500 and let's say the heads come in @$1500 puts us on budget.
I reused the lunati cam from earlier, only because I couldn't find that crower cam on summit.
There were other cam & lifter kits from Howard's that I considered, but I really don't know which to pick, this list is open to review, especially the timing set, I've never used a roller cam, so I really didn't know which to pick.








http://www.summitracing.com/int/part...134g/overview/
Last edited by resdoggie; Mar 21, 2014 at 01:17 PM.
Out side of that I left the roller rockers, lifters, timing set, stall converter to his discretion.
Now we WAIT. Almost sick over this, feel like I just jumped over a cliff. Hope it all pans out.
I think once parts start showing ill continue this thread with pics, I'll need help. I've never touched a roller cam before.
Last edited by vettezobsezzed; Mar 21, 2014 at 02:14 PM.
http://www.summitracing.com/int/part...134g/overview/
The bore is too small on that gasket. He needs at least 4.185".
I think once parts start showing ill continue this thread with pics, I'll need help. I've never touched a roller cam before.
Felt like I was making irreversible mistakes all along the way until I got it fired up and nothing came apart or failed.
You'll like the roller cam. I have on in my 350 and it has a nice strong broad midrange and still has good top to. With your 3.55 rear you'll love the new power.
don't go too cheap on the torque converter. If you do, you might have the pleasure of also replacing your transmission.
Your specs on that 284* duration cam look really good.
Glad Mako pointed you towards the .027" head gasket instead of the .040" one.
This way your quench will be .047, much better that .060" and it's the best you can do with that size bore it looks like.
Once the heads show up take the time to CC the chambers so you know exactly what the volume is. 70 cc advertised doesn't always mean that is what it really measures out at.





http://www.summitracing.com/int/part...134g/overview/
Been a couple hours since I made this a go, I'm feeling a lot better about it any way.










