C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

wake up a sleepy L48

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2016, 05:48 PM
  #61  
keithl1967
Racer
Thread Starter
 
keithl1967's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Location: Harrisburg PA
Posts: 420
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

If considering Vortec heads...are the "906" heads OK? I came across someone today that has a pair they are willing to sell for about $200...

If so, and assuming I have to replace the valve springs, can I use the ones right off my 882s? Also might upgrade the rockers to 1.6... Thsi is assuming I don't do a cam swap...

as for the 276HR--that would most likely be my cam of choice, if I went that direction...I have the 282HR in my camaro's 406 that I built , and it is a fantastic cam...considering the 350 is a tad smaller, I imagine it would be perfect!
Old 10-01-2016, 06:00 PM
  #62  
keithl1967
Racer
Thread Starter
 
keithl1967's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Location: Harrisburg PA
Posts: 420
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

I will also say that this is absolutely the proverbial slippery slope...If I wer going to open her up for a cam replacement, I may as well do a total rebuild...

I have on the shelf a set of TRW forged flat tops (4 valve relief that are .030 over)...If i were going to tear it apart that much, I might just go the full monty!!

Was really trying to go on a budget--the HR cams are a tad expensive (almost $1K for the full kit--inc springs, etc)...
I don't trust any flat tappets anymore...Hate to go through a rebuild just to wipe out a lobe on initial startup...
Old 10-01-2016, 06:55 PM
  #63  
ykf7b0
Racer
 
ykf7b0's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2014
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 479
Received 91 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

I'm with you on the flat tappet cam issues. I recommend an inexpensive vortec head swap and the 906's will be fine but get the .015 steel shim head gaskets for even more compression. Get new springs if you do a roller swap and leave the vortec springs on if you are not doing a cam swap at this time.

Last edited by ykf7b0; 10-01-2016 at 06:59 PM.
Old 10-01-2016, 08:12 PM
  #64  
keithl1967
Racer
Thread Starter
 
keithl1967's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Location: Harrisburg PA
Posts: 420
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ykf7b0
I'm with you on the flat tappet cam issues. I recommend an inexpensive vortec head swap and the 906's will be fine but get the .015 steel shim head gaskets for even more compression. Get new springs if you do a roller swap and leave the vortec springs on if you are not doing a cam swap at this time.
weren't vortec heads set up for roller cams? won't the stock vortec spring pressures be too stiff for the flat tappet cam?
Old 10-01-2016, 09:31 PM
  #65  
ykf7b0
Racer
 
ykf7b0's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2014
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 479
Received 91 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by keithl1967
weren't vortec heads set up for roller cams? won't the stock vortec spring pressures be too stiff for the flat tappet cam?
The spring pressure isn't that great on factory vortecs. You are just limited on the lift to around .475 or so without machine work on the heads. I have a set of 062 vortecs on my factory L-48 and I didn't change anything on the head and used it as it came from the factory. They were removed from a 98 Z-71. Those heads and a set of Hooker headers really improved the L-48.
Old 10-03-2016, 09:31 AM
  #66  
0BluePrint Engines
Former Vendor
 
BluePrint Engines's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by keithl1967
If considering Vortec heads...are the "906" heads OK? I came across someone today that has a pair they are willing to sell for about $200...

If so, and assuming I have to replace the valve springs, can I use the ones right off my 882s? Also might upgrade the rockers to 1.6... Thsi is assuming I don't do a cam swap...

as for the 276HR--that would most likely be my cam of choice, if I went that direction...I have the 282HR in my camaro's 406 that I built , and it is a fantastic cam...considering the 350 is a tad smaller, I imagine it would be perfect!
A couple things to keep in mind when you are planning your rebuild and upgrade. First, the 906 Vortec heads, which are a great upgrade over the stock heads, are limited to about a .450 lift without machining down the valve guides, even then about .510 lift is near absolute maximum. Second, flat top pistons with Vortec's 64cc combustion chambers on a 350 will give you 10:1 compression with a standard .041" gasket. That is pretty high for an iron headed engine on pump gas. You can do that compression with aluminum. I would stick with stock dished pistons if you want to run these heads.

The factory camshaft specs on the L-48 were .398/.410 lift with 198/208 duration @.050. I forget the lobe separation angle, but it was probably 113-114*. To figure lift with 1.6 ratio rockers on any small block Chevy camshaft, just divide the valve lift specs by 1.5 to get lobe lift, then multiply by 1.6. The duration will only go up about 1-2*.

Do not reuse your 40 year old valve springs with any cam upgrade. They are not that expensive. Our H8002K heads have the valve springs that will work with cams up to .575" lift and you can definitely run 10:1 compression with them on 91 octane gas.

Good luck.

Scott Liggett
BluePrint Engines
1(800)483-4263
info@blueprintengines.com
www.blueprintengines.com

Last edited by BluePrint Engines; 10-03-2016 at 09:35 AM.
Old 10-03-2016, 10:51 AM
  #67  
Richard Daugird
Melting Slicks
 
Richard Daugird's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: Texas City, TX Texas
Posts: 3,143
Received 718 Likes on 518 Posts
Default

Scott-
I see you have the HP8102 coming soon for seven bills, that's a great price. In what application would you recommended those heads?
Old 10-03-2016, 01:31 PM
  #68  
scottyp99
Le Mans Master
 
scottyp99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Oxford MA-----You just lost the game!!!!
Posts: 5,948
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

If you're looking to "wake up" an L48, or most any old school engine for that matter, re-curving the distributor is the best 20 bucks you'll ever spend.

Scott
The following users liked this post:
keithl1967 (10-07-2016)
Old 10-03-2016, 08:39 PM
  #69  
tabbruzz
Safety Car
 
tabbruzz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 3,919
Received 290 Likes on 215 Posts

Default

No weight was pulled out of the car with the exception of a ac compressor which was dead. When I got the car it did a 15.4. Now, I do have drag radials on the car so it stuck really good. That 12.71 was a best but I have a ton of 12.8s and mid to high 12.7s. I used to run the car alot during the corvette challenge drag racing series at Etown.
Originally Posted by Krystal
It's more than impressive........it's flat out amazing. I wouldn't have expected that'd even be possible on the changes he's listed. This makes his car as fast or faster than most modern LS powered Corvettes. He's flat out STOMPING LT-1 1970 Corvettes, the benchmark for 350 small blacks of the Carburation era.

Somehow he's getting a whole lot more out of the combination than I'd ever have believed possible. Makes me wonder how much weight he's managed to pull out of the car.

Last edited by tabbruzz; 10-03-2016 at 08:41 PM.
Old 10-03-2016, 08:56 PM
  #70  
tabbruzz
Safety Car
 
tabbruzz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 3,919
Received 290 Likes on 215 Posts

Default

It actually did make it quicker then my c5 but that,was when the c5 was bone stock. With mods in my signature for the c5 I got down to 12.2 but it should have done better if the car would have stuck at the starting line. I had like 5 year old rock hard drag radials at the time . But without going into the engine on a c5 ls1 you can get into the 11s....My c5 was tuned by me so a professional tuner can get more out of her I am sure...
Originally Posted by Krystal
It's more than impressive........it's flat out amazing. I wouldn't have expected that'd even be possible on the changes he's listed. This makes his car as fast or faster than most modern LS powered Corvettes. He's flat out STOMPING LT-1 1970 Corvettes, the benchmark for 350 small blacks of the Carburation era.

Somehow he's getting a whole lot more out of the combination than I'd ever have believed possible. Makes me wonder how much weight he's managed to pull out of the car.

Last edited by tabbruzz; 10-03-2016 at 08:57 PM.
Old 10-04-2016, 12:13 PM
  #71  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

Stock LS1 with a cam and heaers will not make 450lbs tq to the tire
It takes quite a bit to get them to 430 at the tire it will be finicky just like a Gen 1 would. Use a little less cam timing yes

They are good platforms but sometimes a little overrated
To get big power youll spend big $ getting there.
The stock LS1 heads are not impressive...LS6 arent bad
I would still stick with a Gen 1 platform there are 300cfm heads nice intake out there you can still make great power. Just put a bigger arm in it thats where the "thats it!" factor comes from when you step on a new build.
A stock stroke rebuild wiht fresh ring/valve seal and a cam sure feels alittle better but most times leaves you hoping it would make more power than it did. Always build bigger when you can.
Old 10-06-2016, 10:30 PM
  #72  
63mako
Race Director
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by NewbVetteGuy
8.5:1 compression? with 64cc combustion chamber... doesn't sound right... -Weren't the original heads 76cc chambers?



Adam
To go with vortec heads and a cam kit you need a different intake, valve covers, Different springs, likely beehives to fit the pockets, right pressure and get the lift of a decent cam, retainers to fit the beehives and, buy the heads. The stock L48 actually calculates out under 8 to 1 so 64 CC vortecs would be lucky to go over 9 to 1. The Trickflow 175 CC heads with 56 CC chamber with the installed springs setup for the cam you choose is a cheaper, better flowing option that will bump you up to about 9.75 to 1. and make more power across the board.

EDIT: The 461 heads have no accessory holes for your front mount alt, AC, ect.

Last edited by 63mako; 10-06-2016 at 10:41 PM.
Old 07-18-2017, 09:20 AM
  #73  
SpiritOf76
Racer
 
SpiritOf76's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2016
Location: Point Pleasant New Jersey
Posts: 364
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Out of all the options and opinions here, this one rings truest with me. Keep the originality, keep the essence, keep the soul... Just make it the best it can be while keeping it.
Originally Posted by REELAV8R
Not only the look, but the sound, the smell, the carb, it all fits the era and I like it that way as well.
New tech is amazing and can deliver so much more and it has it's place. Just not in my 70's corvette. I like to see how much can be squeezed out of a 350 by a redneck shade tree mechanic like myself.



Quick Reply: wake up a sleepy L48



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 AM.