Heater Motor
Be aware that the replacement motors for these fans are quite different than the originals. Most are much smaller. That, alone, is not a problem; but some are 'chinzy' and very inexpensive. Ask what those differences are between parts choices or purchase from a vendor that you think has the customer foremost in their interest.
Also, while you have that blower removed, you need to evaluate how much debris has collected in the plenum area. If there is some in there, this is the perfect opportunity to clean it out. Git 'er done!!
Last edited by 7T1vette; Jan 15, 2017 at 11:54 AM.





Man, I wish all the jobs I've done on this car were as easy to do as that one was.
And when you go back in with it....it will go faster.
Sometimes removing the coolant over flow reservoir is also required so you can try to get the motor and fan to come out through the top...if not...then it will drop out through the bottom.
DUB
1)Cut and re-glass the motor housing deeper.
2)Machine and install a spacer.
I did the later.

1)Cut and re-glass the motor housing deeper.
2)Machine and install a spacer.
I did the later.
Attachment 48054232
Attachment 48054233
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Knowing that the new motor is taller...thus needed a spacer. Then the area of the squirrel cage fan that is added...thus making us believe it is better....is now actually being blocked/restricted by the spacer and not allowing the same air flow function as the ones in the 1984-1996 design whose air box is made to accept the longer squirrel cage fan and thus allowing it to channel all the air.
I DO KNOW that crap and leaves that can cover or block the front face of the evaporator core WILL effect how much air you get past it. And putting on a motor that is believed to be better may do something...or may not.
I have an air flow meter and I have tested a 1985 when I put on a new blower motor and evaporator core ...so I know what the CFM's are. I have the number for a 1974 with A/C and all new parts so there are no air obstructions. But I have yet to install the C4 motor and test it to verify if my suspicions are correct.
Needless to say...do whatever you like.
And you can look at the front face of the evaporator care once the blower motor is out of the car.
An 1984 or 1985 blower motor uses the same electrical connections. So no wiring modifications are needed.
DUB
Last edited by DUB; Jan 16, 2017 at 07:10 PM.
Knowing that the new motor is taller...thus needed a spacer. Then the area of the squirrel cage fan that is added...thus making us believe it is better....is now actually being blocked/restricted by the spacer and not allowing the same air flow function as the ones in the 1984-1996 design whose air box is made to accept the longer squirrel cage fan and thus allowing it to channel all the air.
I DO KNOW that crap and leaves that can cover or block the front face of the evaporator core WILL effect how much air you get past it. And putting on a motor that is believed to be better may do something...or may not.
I have an air flow meter and I have tested a 1985 when I put on a new blower motor and evaporator core ...so I know what the CFM's are. I have the number for a 1974 with A/C and all new parts so there are no air obstructions. But I have yet to install the C4 motor and test it to verify if my suspicions are correct.
Needless to say...do whatever you like.
And you can look at the front face of the evaporator care once the blower motor is out of the car.
An 1984 or 1985 blower motor uses the same electrical connections. So no wiring modifications are needed.
DUB
Knowing that the new motor is taller...thus needed a spacer. Then the area of the squirrel cage fan that is added...thus making us believe it is better....is now actually being blocked/restricted by the spacer and not allowing the same air flow function as the ones in the 1984-1996 design whose air box is made to accept the longer squirrel cage fan and thus allowing it to channel all the air.
However, let me tell you, even with the spacer, the fan works better.
Maybe the blades, maybe its new, maybe its faster, but it IS better airflow than before.
I know the evaporator core is secured to one of the halves if I am not mistaken...and that is why I think you want to get the left side off first. Heck..I might be confusion it with all the other stuff I have running around in my head all the time.
I will need to measure the air flow so I am totally convinced. I am sure there is a benefit...but I would like the 'dyno results' to confirm it without any doubts.
I did a 1970 that has the 85 blower motor in it and it has been thoroughly cleaned out. I should be gettign it back in the shop for a small issue and I will test it and see if the numbers are higher than the 74 I did that has the stock design blower motor in it.
DUB
I know the evaporator core is secured to one of the halves if I am not mistaken...and that is why I think you want to get the left side off first. Heck..I might be confusion it with all the other stuff I have running around in my head all the time.
I will need to measure the air flow so I am totally convinced. I am sure there is a benefit...but I would like the 'dyno results' to confirm it without any doubts.
I did a 1970 that has the 85 blower motor in it and it has been thoroughly cleaned out. I should be gettign it back in the shop for a small issue and I will test it and see if the numbers are higher than the 74 I did that has the stock design blower motor in it.
DUB
Knowing that the new motor is taller...thus needed a spacer. Then the area of the squirrel cage fan that is added...thus making us believe it is better....is now actually being blocked/restricted by the spacer and not allowing the same air flow function as the ones in the 1984-1996 design whose air box is made to accept the longer squirrel cage fan and thus allowing it to channel all the air.
I DO KNOW that crap and leaves that can cover or block the front face of the evaporator core WILL effect how much air you get past it. And putting on a motor that is believed to be better may do something...or may not.
I have an air flow meter and I have tested a 1985 when I put on a new blower motor and evaporator core ...so I know what the CFM's are. I have the number for a 1974 with A/C and all new parts so there are no air obstructions. But I have yet to install the C4 motor and test it to verify if my suspicions are correct.
Needless to say...do whatever you like.
And you can look at the front face of the evaporator care once the blower motor is out of the car.
An 1984 or 1985 blower motor uses the same electrical connections. So no wiring modifications are needed.
DUB
It's not the depth of the blades that increases the flow it's the angle of attack of the blades. They move air more efficiently than the old blade design.
I did this mod with the spacer and first time I turned it on it blew out bits and pieces of the ducting seal foam from the increased air flow.
I would say it's about 30% greater air flow than the stock unit. Just an estimate, I didn't measure it. If a person were to increase the depth of the box to accommodate the deeper fan I suspect it would be an even greater increase.
Last edited by REELAV8R; Jan 18, 2017 at 11:09 AM.
I need to look at some stuff and might get back to this.
DUB














