When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I tried to modify the spreadsheet once to add another transmission choice and it absolutely would not take it. Apparently I reached a limitation of Excel. As such I can put in any gear ratios I want but I have to replace an existing transmission choice. The 4+3 also gets complicated again by the overdrive that can be engaged in different gears. It's not compltely impossible but it doesn't really fit my existing setup. If you know the gear ratios and overdrive ratio's I'll gladly put it into a sheet for you, it just won't be exactly like the one you're looking at.
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
That's showing you theoretical speed, redline limited in top gear, which doesn't apply to any car really.
There might be an aero limit first, and where that speeds lands on the power band is important too. If you aren't drag or horsepower limited, than a taller gear is in order.
i have a spreadsheet kicking around here somewhere that i made for a college course, adds in aero/tire drag, the dyno curve, and everything on yours to simulate a 0-60 run or 1/4 mile or top speed, or whatever you need.
Actually provided that there is no slippage in the drivetrain it's extremely accurate. If there is an aerodynamic issue the engine won't be able to reach a given RPM, hence the problem you run into in 6th gear.
It's not intended to be the end all, just the theoretical top speed for a given RPM / tire size / gear ratio / trans. Believe it or not it's VERY accurate.
Motor trend test a 1992 for top speed and got 172 MPH out of it. The sheet which is set up for a 92 lists 171 at 5800 RPM in 5th gear. Top speeds for any given gear are dead on at the track. For my case with a 6500 RPM red line that gives 111 in third. I do have to shift into 4th at the track, for a few feet. When I was only making enough power to trap 112 it didn't matter because I was shifting as I crossed the traps.
Granted there are lots of issues but assuming no slippage of the tire or the drivetrain, the math is very correct.
Id check into Rippie's Wilwood package or some big Brembos. Ive heard really mixed reviews about that dual caliper setup. JeffVette has the Porsche Brembo system on his ZR1...its a sweet setup.
Thank you for every one inputs. Regarding which brakes is better. I don't much about wilwood brake. But base on what TJWong told me in the pass, that his dual caliper 13" performs way better than the big Brembo brake. He says has driven car with brembo brake and they are not as good as dual caliper brake.
Decision decision.
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Originally Posted by Nathan Plemons
Granted there are lots of issues but assuming no slippage of the tire or the drivetrain, the math is very correct.
I don't doubt it one bit.
Now that we're on subject, anyone have some dyno curves I can plug into my spreadsheet? I'd like to test it out against actual 1/4 mile times. I even added in things like clutch slippage and shift delay.
Thank you for every one inputs. Regarding which brakes is better. I don't much about wilwood brake. But base on what TJWong told me in the pass, that his dual caliper 13" performs way better than the big Brembo brake. He says has driven car with brembo brake and they are not as good as dual caliper brake.
Decision decision.
Bruce
Bruce,
I have a buddy with a Doug Rippie DRM600 ZR1...he has the Wilwoods and said the pedal is way more firm than the Brembo packages he's driven. FWIW.
If i was going to push 200mph, I would certainly want a bigger/meatier than stock rotor to help get me slowed down, regardless of how many calipers I had on it.
Last edited by SurfnSun; Feb 18, 2005 at 09:20 AM.
no fraid not thats MPH look at the DIC next to the 217 it says MPH
you didnt think that was on the road .......did you ???
there is a car mag called Redline over here in the UK and there is a section in it where ricers can post in pics of their speedos while they are going as fast as their little cars will go ( 130 / 145 mph usually ) so I thought I would post in this pic just to upset them
Hey Bruce here's something to think about, you'll have about 300hp more than the Sledgehammer
Sledgehammer has 898 BHP, so 1000 BHP is only 102 BHP more, not 300!! Sledgehammer also has a different gearbox to the ZF,different lower control arms and is abit more slippery. Now to the other guy,how did you get a 1990 L98 to push you to 217 MPH?? That is one hell of an L98. Easier way to get a pic like that, pull your tail shaft out and rev it up 6th.
Last edited by Casethecorvetteman; Jul 15, 2005 at 11:32 AM.
Now that we're on subject, anyone have some dyno curves I can plug into my spreadsheet? I'd like to test it out against actual 1/4 mile times. I even added in things like clutch slippage and shift delay.
Here is my dyno sheet. I would like to see the results.
From: No more yankee my wankee, the Donger is tired!
Originally Posted by Bruce
Thank you for every one inputs. Regarding which brakes is better. I don't much about wilwood brake. But base on what TJWong told me in the pass, that his dual caliper 13" performs way better than the big Brembo brake. He says has driven car with brembo brake and they are not as good as dual caliper brake.
Decision decision.
There wasn't any jackstands involved in that run, were there??? Lets see, jack up the rear, tcs off, 6th gear run up to redline = 200+++ on the speedo.
BTW cf member ericcer has the dual a/o caliper setup and loves it.
I don't know... When my 84' was a measly stock 205hp i hit 160 down in FL and it felt like I had more. I later looked up the top speed for the 84 and i think was like 150 or something. I would have guessed he could have hit at least 185. As far as 217, i would have to see it... but there is always a possiblity, tailwind, down a 6% grade moutain, half to a quarter tank of gas, 75 degrees, loosely built stock motor that has more hp, etc, etc...
keep the stories commin!
Last edited by kpforce1; Jul 15, 2005 at 03:04 PM.