C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Back pressure guage anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #21  
rick lambert's Avatar
rick lambert
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,130
Likes: 2
From: seattle WA
Default

Sure did, thanks CFI-EFI, I'll probably order one, then get some braided line and an adapter for the 02 bung. Just think it would be a nice tool, but not at the prices they want that I saw $116. plug for an actual back pressure guage.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #22  
Tom Piper's Avatar
Tom Piper
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 4
From: Mexico Beach FL
Default

My '92 manual instructions say to plug the back-pressure gauge into the tube where the AIR check valves are located -- not the O2 fittings.

Tom Piper
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #23  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by rick lambert
Sure did, thanks CFI-EFI, I'll probably order one, then get some braided line and an adapter for the 02 bung.
It sounds to me that you are going to make a bigger production out of this than it deserves. When the muffler shop tested my back pressure to see if I needed a new cat, they burned a hole on the exhaust pipe, stuck a tapered piece of aluminum into the hole and had me rev the engine. Then they welded up the hole. I'm sure you can jury rig something up to closely match the 18 mm O2 bung, and hold it in place while your "lovely assistant" nails the throttle. You don't need any fancy, expensive, "braided line". First, that braiding is only the outer jacket. It protects the hose inside from external heat. Second, the rubber hose only needs to be on whatever you use for a fitting, for a few seconds. If you burn 1/4" of the hose, cut it off.


Originally Posted by rick lambert
Just think it would be a nice tool, but not at the prices they want that I saw $116. plug for an actual back pressure guage.
Remember, pressure is pressure.

RACE ON!!!

Last edited by CFI-EFI; Jul 25, 2006 at 06:22 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 03:59 PM
  #24  
rick lambert's Avatar
rick lambert
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,130
Likes: 2
From: seattle WA
Default

Good point CFI-EFI.

Tom, my FSM says to use the 02 bung.....funny about the difference.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #25  
bjankuski's Avatar
bjankuski
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,157
Likes: 554
From: Glenbeulah Wi
Default

Originally Posted by AKS Racing
How much power do you think is left on the table at just under 6 psi?

This reading was at 6K in 2nd Gear WOT. I have no cats, but full exhaust with mufflers. I have known this to be a problem for some time, but have not attempted to resolve.
6 PSI is alot of backpressure, my guess is you are giving up 30 to 50 HP with that much backpressure. If you were to reduce the backpressure and retune the car I would expect a significant power increase.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #26  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by bjankuski
6 PSI is alot of backpressure,
The muffler shop testing my car for a plugged cat, said that anything over 3 psi, indicated too much back pressure and that I needed a new cat. Two things to keep in mind; my car was being revved in neutral, which generates a lesser volume of exhaust gases than when under load, at WOT, at 6000 rpms in second gear. The other is the motivation of the shop.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #27  
rick lambert's Avatar
rick lambert
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,130
Likes: 2
From: seattle WA
Default

Looking back in my FSM, Tom said his stated you can check it at the A.I.R. Pipe, he is correct, you can check it at both..but the specs are the same. engine at idle should not exceed 1 1/4 psi. Accelerate engine to 2000 RPM, reading should not exceed 3 psi.If backpressure exceeds at either RPM a restricted exhaust system is indicated.

Wonder why they checked your at 6000 RPMs?

And bjankuski, sound like you really exceed 3 psi. of course I'm referring to specs for an 87..don't know if yours would be the same..check your FSM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 03:00 PM
  #28  
Wildcat1's Avatar
Wildcat1
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville AL
Default

How would my resonator with 100k miles affect backpressure?
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:21 PM
  #29  
AKS Racing's Avatar
AKS Racing
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 2
From: Houston TX
Default

Originally Posted by bjankuski
6 PSI is alot of backpressure, my guess is you are giving up 30 to 50 HP with that much backpressure. If you were to reduce the backpressure and retune the car I would expect a significant power increase.
I have been told prior that 2 psi is kind of the max in street/strip applications. I have been told that I am leaving 50-80HP on the table. I know that I am way past the 2 psi (or 3 psi) level, but that is what happens when you have headers feeding into twin 3" collectors, feeding to a single 3.5" oval in the center (no cat) then back to twin 3" Flowmasters. The motor is a 408 with lots of cam/heads/intake and a lot of boost.

A guy on the forum was selling 2" primary "home-built" headers and tru dual 3" exhaust. I did not bite because the back half of the exhaust is really no better than where I am today.

If I sell some more car parts, I would like to get some of the EM 1 7/8" headers and then try a single 4.5" oval center pipe into 3.5" Flowmasters. I would think this is a step in the right direction.

Aaron
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #30  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by rick lambert
Wonder why they checked your at 6000 RPMs?
Mine wasn't checked at 6000 rpms. It was AKS Racing.
Originally Posted by AKS Racing
This reading was at 6K in 2nd Gear WOT.
Mine was just revved in neutral at WOT. It probably didn't exceed 3000 rpms.
Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
my car was being revved in neutral, which generates a lesser volume of exhaust gases than when under load, at WOT, at 6000 rpms in second gear.
RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #31  
Tom Piper's Avatar
Tom Piper
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 4
From: Mexico Beach FL
Default

After reading this thread, I decided to check the back-pressure on my '92.

I bought two brass fittings at Lowe's, one 1/2" female pipe to 1/4" female pipe and one 1/4" male pipe to a 1/4" barb fitting for my gauge. Cost, about $3.

My A.I.R. check valves were easy to remove.
Even with the Northstar coil pak for the Delteq on the left valve cover, I didn't have to remove anything to take the check valves out.
Taking one check valve out at a time, it took about 10 minutes each to check the back-pressure.

The highest reading at about 3K rpm was less than 1.
My cats aren't plugged at 88K miles.

Tom Piper
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 09:38 AM
  #32  
Wildcat1's Avatar
Wildcat1
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville AL
Default

Good deal, Tom! Do you have a resonator on the car?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 06:16 AM
  #33  
Tom Piper's Avatar
Tom Piper
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 4
From: Mexico Beach FL
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1
...Do you have a resonator on the car?
My car has the 100% original exhaust system.


Tom Piper
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 07:58 AM
  #34  
bjankuski's Avatar
bjankuski
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,157
Likes: 554
From: Glenbeulah Wi
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Piper
After reading this thread, I decided to check the back-pressure on my '92.

I bought two brass fittings at Lowe's, one 1/2" female pipe to 1/4" female pipe and one 1/4" male pipe to a 1/4" barb fitting for my gauge. Cost, about $3.

My A.I.R. check valves were easy to remove.
Even with the Northstar coil pak for the Delteq on the left valve cover, I didn't have to remove anything to take the check valves out.
Taking one check valve out at a time, it took about 10 minutes each to check the back-pressure.

The highest reading at about 3K rpm was less than 1.
My cats aren't plugged at 88K miles.

Tom Piper
Did you check it at WOT? You need to check for plugged CATS at WOT because that is when you are moving large amounts of exhaust, no load conditions do not move much exhaust.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #35  
Tom Piper's Avatar
Tom Piper
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 4
From: Mexico Beach FL
Default

Originally Posted by bjankuski
Did you check it at WOT? You need to check for plugged CATS at WOT because that is when you are moving large amounts of exhaust, no load conditions do not move much exhaust.
Just a brief blip to 3K at WOT.

I have no intention of WOT in neutral for any length of time.
If that isn't enough, I won't be doing any more.

Tom Piper
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 09:30 AM
  #36  
CMYC4GO's Avatar
CMYC4GO
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by rick lambert
I guess you and I are the only one old enough to remember JC Whitney
CFI-EFI but that is interesting, I'll look.
Hey now! I still get the JC Whitney catalog, in fact, I orderd my outer door window seals from them, and to say that I was amazed/impressed with the quality of the part is an understatement. The only problem with JC Whitney, is it's a crap shoot when you get ready to order something from them.....are they gonna have it, or is it on indefinite "back order"?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 10:15 AM
  #37  
bjankuski's Avatar
bjankuski
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,157
Likes: 554
From: Glenbeulah Wi
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Piper
Just a brief blip to 3K at WOT.

I have no intention of WOT in neutral for any length of time.
If that isn't enough, I won't be doing any more.

Tom Piper
Tom,
Check the pressure at WOT while your driving the car, not in netural. Get on the highway pick a gear that is a safe speed and go to WOT from 2000 to 5000 RPM and see what the backpressure is. I quick blip to 3000 RPM in netural will not give you an accurate reading.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #38  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

There is no question that a blip in neutral will not supply the volume of exhaust gases that a WOT run will, but that is how the muffler shop determined that I needed a cat. I wasn't in the car and I couldn't see the tach, but they did not rev it unmercifully. I would guess that 3000-3500 was about it. I was told that 3 psi back pressure indicated a cat was needed. Tom Piper observed less than 1 pound. My car had 15 psi. No wonder it had lost a second in the 1/4 mile.

RACE ON!!!

Last edited by CFI-EFI; Aug 2, 2006 at 10:33 AM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE