When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
These electric SC threads always intrigue me. The theory behind an electric SC is sound, force air into the motor right? What's wrong with that, granted these things we see on ebay are probably junk but why hasn't this ever been perfected. I mean electric motors can generate massive torque, look at your starter.
Couple a high torque electric motor to a "geared up" blower and why wouldn't that work? Is there a power in and out issue or something?
Look at some of the smaller turbos, hell they're being turned by nothing more than exhaust gas. An electric motor should be able to provide that kind of force right?
If it's a boost vs. rpm matching thing or boost vs. vacuum, hell that shouldn't be that hard to overcome with an AC motor and frequency drive synced to whatever the need be.
Am I totally crazy here?
the only problem I see with a properly designed electric driven supercharger as described above is this. In a traditional belt driven super the work is done by the engine crank directly no transfer of energy is required (except the belt and pully) In an electric super the electricity has to come from some where (aka alt) so the conversion of power between the rotation of the engine to electricity in the alt and then the elec motor driving the super using that elec. There would be more power loss overall for a elec super, unless the super was driven solely by a battery this type of configuration may be usefull for drag racing but I have never seen or hear of it
From: I have no tolerence for liberals and fools, but sometimes i repeat myself
CI 3-5-7-8-9 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08
Originally Posted by CentralCoaster
What does your vacuum gage have to do with anything? The motor also spins clockwise and the sky is blue.
The leaf blower will become a restriction over 5000rpm on a 350ci motor.
a vacuum gauge is a measurement of restriction. I used the throttle body reference orginally because that's what the throttle body does, create a restriction. So if you hook a vacuum gauge to the intake and make a WOT pass, if the vacuum gauge reads anything above zero then your engine will outflow the restriction, wether that restriction is the TB, the air duct, the MAF, a dirty air filter, or a leaf blower.
I still say the leaf blower is mostly useless because as the engine accelerates it will make less and less boost, and if it only flows 500CFM it will eventually become a restriction, at what RPM is going to depend on the engine.
"Electric superchargers" do not work because they are just a fan. There is no compression of the air, its just being moved.
For instance, if you have ever filled up an air mattress, rather than the mattress popping from too much air, the air will just flow back through the blower motor at a certain point.
An electric supercharger would work if the design was right... i don't see it ever surpassing the traditional belt driven supercharger though for many reasons.
From: SCMR Rat Pack'r Charter Member..Great Bend KS
Originally Posted by ALLT4
If it's a boost vs. rpm matching thing or boost vs. vacuum, hell that shouldn't be that hard to overcome with an AC motor and frequency drive synced to whatever the need be. Am I totally crazy here?
No, only partially.
Our cars run on DC. You'd need a mighty long extention cord to run an AC motor of sufficient power to force air, under pressure, at wide open throttle into a 350cu in engine running at 5000+ rpm.
Don't even think about trying to use an inverter.
Our cars run on DC. You'd need a might long extention cord to run an AC motor of sufficient power to force air, under pressure, at wide open throttle into a 350cu in engine running at 5000+ rpm.
Don't even think about trying to use an inverter.
Larry
code5coupe
it would be a waste of time and weight but to get the AC you could install a second alternator with the DC recifier bridge removed but whats the point?
From: SCMR Rat Pack'r Charter Member..Great Bend KS
Originally Posted by 93-383
you could install a second alternator with the DC recifier bridge removed but whats the point?
You are right, and I agree.
If you want X amount of boost at X rpm on X engine, it will take a supercharger that requires Y amount of power to drive it.
Whether that Y power comes directly from the crankshaft (Roots type blower) or from the crankshaft to a generator to an electric motor to the blower...the power still has to come from the engine.
Don't even try to figure out how many batteries and an inverter it would take to develop the power required...it would not be feasible to add the hundreds of pounds necessary to get you down the quarter mile.
Use a generator? It would have to be almost as large as the engine.
This interesting subject was discussed several years ago here on the Forum. After pages and pages of thread, one of the members promised that he would explore this to the fullest and report back....
No word yet....
That's because it's a dead end.
Personally I think it's just a matter of the extensive supporting electronics that would be needed. A variable frequency drive (VFD in the Heat and Vent business) is possible with a second alternator. This solves the problem of varying the speed of the motor while maintaining the torque. The problem remains of calculating boost to engine demand, more supporting electronics.
By the time someone would add a second alternator, the motor and compressor itself, a black box so to speak to do all the calculations, a wiring nightmare to deal with and you've reached the point of diminishing returns quickly. Not to mention a complete mess in your engine bay.
Plus, don't super chargers right now supply more than the engine is capable of using? Isn't that the reason for a pop off valve or waste gate in a turbo?
Still, I'd like to see someone try it but not this Cowboy.
Why electric? What about a second gas engine? I used to fly RC planes a long time ago. Those things could push a lot of air for such little engines. If it was redesigned for a supercharger housing could it work? The gas they used was pink in color. I can't remember what it's called. How much air output would be needed for it to be worth the effort? I would never try anything like this. I was just thinking outloud.
Plus, don't super chargers right now supply more than the engine is capable of using? Isn't that the reason for a pop off valve or waste gate in a turbo?
.
kinda the waste gate on a turbo prevents it from overspeeding (too high boost) and the BOV removes the turbo to throttle body press when the throttle body is closed (like when shifting) if the press reamined upstream of the turbo without the same exh flow as before (thorttle open) the compressor would stall and then once you reopend the throttles the compressor wheel would have to start spinning all over again plus the suden stop can damage the compressor as for superchargers ya the speed is limited by the pulley used the bleed off valves relive the press that the engine was not designed for
curiously dose anyone know how much hp trq is used from the engine to drive a supercharger example the common vortech kit
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Originally Posted by vetteman9368
a vacuum gauge is a measurement of restriction. I used the throttle body reference orginally because that's what the throttle body does, create a restriction. So if you hook a vacuum gauge to the intake and make a WOT pass, if the vacuum gauge reads anything above zero then your engine will outflow the restriction, wether that restriction is the TB, the air duct, the MAF, a dirty air filter, or a leaf blower.
The only time your plenum vacuum guage will read above zero on an N/A motor is when your car is backfiring.
My original point was that intake and exhaust components are flow rated at standardized pressure drops that will typically never be seen in reality, and all the talk about "this will outflow that" is regirgitated b.s. A throttlebody at WOT for example, will never have 1.5in of mercury pulled across it, or 28in H2o, or whatever its rated at. And if you do manage to, then your throttle body is too small.
Those electric motors can provide marginal boost, or marginal flow, but not both at the same time. You'd need a 20hp electric motor to get any useful boost, but it'd weigh more than you and would kill your alternator instantly.
From: I have no tolerence for liberals and fools, but sometimes i repeat myself
CI 3-5-7-8-9 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08
Originally Posted by CentralCoaster
The only time your plenum vacuum guage will read above zero on an N/A motor is when your car is backfiring.
My original point was that intake and exhaust components are flow rated at standardized pressure drops that will typically never be seen in reality, and all the talk about "this will outflow that" is regirgitated b.s. A throttlebody at WOT for example, will never have 1.5in of mercury pulled across it, or 28in H2o, or whatever its rated at. And if you do manage to, then your throttle body is too small.
Those electric motors can provide marginal boost, or marginal flow, but not both at the same time. You'd need a 20hp electric motor to get any useful boost, but it'd weigh more than you and would kill your alternator instantly.
I agree with you on most of that and when i said ABOVE zero i meant on the guage, any idiot knows its a negative pressure