When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I don't know what to tell you...I have a 93 with long tubes, 3:73 gears, 3200 stall converter, a Dana 44 and drag radials...I have not been able to get this car under 13.18 yet and that was in cold weather up in Richmond, Va. last Feb...this year I will surpass 1000 runs at the drag strip spread over the last 5 years so I think the driver is OK...
Before I upped the converter stall from 2400 my best was 13.41...maybe I just have one of them turds..lol
IMHO something is wrong with your car. When mine was bone stock, except for a 3.54 gear, I ran a 13.17 on mich. street tires at MIR, Added a 3000 stall conv. and ran a 12.91, again on street tires.
On a good day, (DA) you should be able to run a low to mid 12, with the drag radials and long tube headers.
Last edited by 93 ragtop; Aug 26, 2007 at 04:28 PM.
Explain to us all why exactly you would want an AFPR on a car with a flashable PCM that has an injector constant that can be adjusted to suit injector size? Turning up the fuel pressure DOES NOT make the car more powerful and certainly wont make it move quicker. Waste of money is what it is, he only wants to get into 12s, adjusting fuel pressure is totally unrequired and will just complicate the tuning.
Easy there pudding -- didn't really pay attention that it was a '96. Go throw another shrimp on the barbie and cool down with a Fosters.
IMHO something is wrong with your car. When mine was bone stock, except for a 3.54 gear, I ran a 13.17 on mich. street tires at MIR, Added a 3000 stall conv. and ran a 12.91, again on street tires.
On a good day, (DA) you should be able to run a low to mid 12, with the drag radials and long tube headers.
Methinks you are correct...something isn't right...I think there may be issues in the tune but we'll see...if I still have the car next year I plan to take it up to Alvin for him to work his magic...
Spray is fine for some I suppose.........but my personal challenge is to get hp the old school way.
To each his own.
Just out of curiosity, do you have any legit reason why you don't like nitrous? I can understand the personal preference, but you seem to dislike N20 to such an extent that you must have a valid technical reason for not using the spray.
Just out of curiosity, do you have any legit reason why you don't like nitrous? I can understand the personal preference, but you seem to dislike N20 to such an extent that you must have a valid technical reason for not using the spray.
I can't really explain it other than repeating the term 'old school'.
The over 50 croud here may understand me.
NOX is exciting, for sure. Don't get me wrong! Some day I may actually try it!
But for now? As I said earlier....my personal challenge is to 'do it' NA.
Just out of curiosity, do you have any legit reason why you don't like nitrous? I can understand the personal preference, but you seem to dislike N20 to such an extent that you must have a valid technical reason for not using the spray.
those are some fast lt1 times... 13.1? you would need much from there..lol.. a stall and a tune will really wake it up alot.. gears are never a bad move. but i wouldn't really waste too much money on a d36 myself.
to the old school guy about nitrous.. get real. you are pissing in the wind with that whole cheating nonsense.. noone asked what you thought of nitrous.. they asked what would net the results they want. try giving useful info instead of enlightening us of your ignorance of about a product you have never used.. and for the record nitrous has been around racing longer than you think. if you are really trying to keep it real with the old school what the hell you doing on a computer?