C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

84 cross fire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #161  
Tom400CFI's Avatar
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,543
Likes: 3,216
From: Park City Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Ruggeri
I could refute some of your points one by one, but I'm convinced that would be pointless. If you all want to believe that the only reason TPI makes more HP an torque than a TBI is the size of the ports go ahead.
Then how do you explain a ported-only CFI running w/and beating Stock and mildly modified TPI's?? -A fact which you recognized in post number 149!

If fuel routing, or origin of introduction to the air flow is a "problem", how do you explain the excellent functioning and undeniable effectiveness of a carburetor for over 100 years?

I've been restraining myself from saying this, but I can't any more: I feel bad for the people who paid you to work on their Corvettes. CLEARLY, I did far better w/my own CFI car(a Trans Am), by myself, then you would have. And I'm money ahead for not having paid for your "services".

Last edited by Tom400CFI; Nov 24, 2007 at 02:43 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #162  
zr1fred's Avatar
zr1fred
Race Director
15 Year Member
Veteran: Marine Corps
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,691
Likes: 71
From: Phoenix Arizona
Default

Paul, most of us know what you meant. Is port injection better, yes. Is "tuned" port injection better, well......
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #163  
Tom400CFI's Avatar
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,543
Likes: 3,216
From: Park City Utah
Default

Originally Posted by zr1fred
Paul, most of us know what you meant. Is port injection better, yes. Is "tuned" port injection better, well......
Why is comrehension/comunication SO difficult? Even when it is clearly written?? ZR1, it's been clearly stated that stock vs stock, "TPI" IS better. And it's been clearly stated that port injection is technically a better method. And I don't think that in 9 pages, anyone has denied or argued that. If they have, quote it and show us please.

But no, "most of us" DON'T know what Paul meant. When a "Corvette mechanic" of 20 + years tell us that:
Originally Posted by Paul Ruggeri
CFI sprays the fuel on the throttle plates, like a carb. TPI sprays the fuel into the intake ports at a higher pressure. This is why ultimately TPI can produce more HP
...well, that's just wrong. Where "fuel is sprayed" is NOT what causes the discrepancy in power between the two systems; the CFM and crossection of the stock runners is. Maybe Paul needs to articulate himself better? What might help is if he uses science and proven theory, and not annecdotal comparisons, like L98's vs. LT1's.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 06:14 PM
  #164  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,303
Likes: 714
From: Bartlett IL
Default

Originally Posted by Tom400CFI
...well, that's just wrong. Where "fuel is sprayed" is NOT what causes the discrepancy in power between the two systems; the CFM and crossection of the stock runners is. Maybe Paul needs to articulate himself better? What might help is if he uses science and proven theory, and not annecdotal comparisons, like L98's vs. LT1's.
BTW, where the fuel is sprayed on a TBI system is NOT the throttle plates. A properly functioning TB injector has a cone like spray meant to distribute the fuel onto the wall of the venturi just above the throttle plate. The air rushing past the fuel "shears" it off the wall and that's how it ends up in suspension. Just another Xfire/TBI factoid for those not familiar with how it works.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #165  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Tom400CFI
Why is comrehension/comunication SO difficult? Even when it is clearly written??
At first I was thinking it was strictly MY failure to communicate. And while I may be doing a poor job, I see I am not alone in not getting through. Did you ever get the feeling that you were talking to a brick wall? I don't think I, personally, can make it any more clear. I can't think of any better ways to express myself or to illustrate the point. I feel as though I've failed, but as I said in my last post, I'm not even going to try anymore.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #166  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso
BTW, where the fuel is sprayed on a TBI system is NOT the throttle plates. A properly functioning TB injector has a cone like spray meant to distribute the fuel onto the wall of the venturi just above the throttle plate. The air rushing past the fuel "shears" it off the wall and that's how it ends up in suspension. Just another Xfire/TBI factoid for those not familiar with how it works.

Except there is no venturi in an EFI TB. It (they) has (have) straight throttle bores.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 08:07 PM
  #167  
Paul Ruggeri's Avatar
0Paul Ruggeri
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 3
From: Carmichael ca
Default

Maybe I was unclear with my original point. It is; that the difference in hp between an 84 and an 85 is not just,"NOT JUST", the restrictive ports on the 84. That the fact that they use two different FI systems has "something" to do with it. When I said that TBI sprays the fuel on the throttle plate, I should have said above the throttle plate. That may have reduced some of the venom hurled my way.
Basically by spraying the fuel under higher pressure, producing better atomization, directly into the ports, you get a more controlable and precise mixture. I believe this is part, not all, of the reason for the hp difference.
If you disagree, OK. I still think what I've just said is true, but obviously I'm not changing any minds. Perhaps my arguements aren't effective or my sarcasm has put some people off. Most people take it with a sense of humor, some can't.
Here's a thought I had. Suppose, and I'm not saying this is even possible, but just as a sort of mental experiment. You took an 85 and removed the throttle body. In its place you put a TBI. Running the engine off the TBI instead of the the port injectors, would it still make 230 hp?

Trying hard to play nice, Paul
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #168  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,303
Likes: 714
From: Bartlett IL
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Ruggeri
Maybe I was unclear with my original point. It is; that the difference in hp between an 84 and an 85 is not just,"NOT JUST", the restrictive ports on the 84. That the fact that they use two different FI systems has "something" to do with it. When I said that TBI sprays the fuel on the throttle plate, I should have said above the throttle plate. That may have reduced some of the venom hurled my way.
Basically by spraying the fuel under higher pressure, producing better atomization, directly into the ports, you get a more controlable and precise mixture. I believe this is part, not all, of the reason for the hp difference.
...Trying hard to play nice, Paul
Paul,

Thank you for trying. But, I think there are at least 3 of us in this thread and many more other Xfire users that have proven porting of the manifold runners explains the difference in horsepower with no other changes. However, this in no way negates your point regarding the conceptually superior capability of a PFI v TBI systems. We all agree with you. But I'll bet I could put a carb on a ported Xfire manifold and make the same if not more hp than the same short block with an 85 TPI setup on it.
If you've ever heard of the Xram, its claim to fame was restoring the 25hp differential by subbing a Weind manifold base with an adapter to mount the TBI units. Port a Xfire manifold and you get the same results.
I just don't think it gets any simpler than that.

Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #169  
Tom400CFI's Avatar
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,543
Likes: 3,216
From: Park City Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Ruggeri
Suppose, and I'm not saying this is even possible, but just as a sort of mental experiment. You took an 85 and removed the throttle body. In its place you put a TBI. Running the engine off the TBI instead of the the port injectors, would it still make 230 hp?
Good post, but my answer is: YES. It may not pass the same emissions standards, or have the same throttle response, and it MAY even get slightly worse gas milage. But it could and would make the same power, IMO. Just like when you take the port EFI off an LS2 and slap a carb and intake on, it makes the same hp (inspite of fuel not being port injected). Port injection does offer the potential for better control, and I don't believe anyone here has argued that.

BUT in the case of this conversation, I don't think that there is any real world, measurable benefit from the port injection, as it came in '85 w/a slow ECM and batch-fire. To wit a real word comparison was made by me when I had my CFI TA (and it was close to stock), vs. an '85 TA that was a 305 TPI. Both cars were F-bodies, both "loaded" (assume similar weight), both sporting 305 long blocks, one with CFI and one with TPI. My CFI car would beat the TPI car at the drag strip, and get better fuel milage on the highway. (1 mph consistently, hand calculated, me driving both cars). The TPI car had a 3.07 rear, and my CFI car had a 3.23 rear. Both cars passed MA emissions test easily and about equally well.

Inspite of those real world results, I'm not going to say that since MY CFI car ran better at the strip, and got as good gas milage or better than the TPI car, that CFI is better -becuase I know that in principle, it's not. I'm saying that the differences realized by a port/batch-fire system vs. a TBI system will NEVER be noticed or measurable in the real world, and that's why I answered YES, above. No reason why you can't get fuel to an engine from before the throttle plates, effectively.

In addition to my "novel" above, what Dom and CFI-EFI have said; porting the CFI and adding fuel to match, results in TPI matching or beating performance. Proof that the delta in performance is cause by air flow challenges w/the tiny CFI runners, as cast.

Last edited by Tom400CFI; Nov 25, 2007 at 09:49 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 03:01 PM
  #170  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default



Originally Posted by Paul Ruggeri
Maybe I was unclear with my original point. It is; that the difference in hp between an 84 and an 85 is not just,"NOT JUST", the restrictive ports on the 84. That the fact that they use two different FI systems has "something" to do with it.
Probably a very little, but the amount is insignificant compared to the difference in air flow.



Originally Posted by Paul Ruggeri
If you disagree, OK. I still think what I've just said is true, but obviously I'm not changing any minds. Perhaps my arguements aren't effective or my sarcasm has put some people off. Most people take it with a sense of humor, some can't.
Neither the sarcasm nor the style of humor has any influence over the facts that you refuse to see. There are three people actively telling you the bold truth. Despite your professional status, I'd be willing to bet any one of the three of us has more, hands on, CFI experience. And each of us are, independently, trying to tell you the facts. You refuse to open your eyes and after all my efforts, I don't care any more.



Originally Posted by Paul Ruggeri
Here's a thought I had. Suppose, and I'm not saying this is even possible, but just as a sort of mental experiment. You took an 85 and removed the throttle body. In its place you put a TBI. Running the engine off the TBI instead of the the port injectors, would it still make 230 hp?
Damn near. That is an awful convoluted path for a wet flow to follow. Even more impossible; picture injectors in each of the ports of the CFI. Instead of 205 HP, you might get 207, but the rpm peak would still be constrained by the limited air flow.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #171  
VIN_#_00521__Z-51_C4's Avatar
VIN_#_00521__Z-51_C4
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: ELK-MAHA Nebraska
Default

I have a question on porting the CFI Manifold....I found this link on it and .... In the pictures, they have removed the EGR and Blocked it off completely.....What are the Benefits of removing the EGR tunnel ( Sorry! I'm new the manifold porting game )

Can someone tell me what can be achieved after removing the EGR tunnel... anyone have an answer...? thanks ! i have plans to Do this soon and since you have to tear it down to port match it i was curious to know it it improved the performance w/o the EGR



Thanks

.....And sorry if i Hijacked the thread http://www.technovelocity.com/chevyh...-fire manifold
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #172  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,303
Likes: 714
From: Bartlett IL
Default

Originally Posted by VIN_#_00521__Z-51_C4
I have a question on porting the CFI Manifold....I found this link on it and .... In the pictures, they have removed the EGR and Blocked it off completely.....What are the Benefits of removing the EGR tunnel ( Sorry! I'm new the manifold porting game )

Can someone tell me what can be achieved after removing the EGR tunnel... anyone have an answer...? thanks ! i have plans to Do this soon and since you have to tear it down to port match it i was curious to know it it improved the performance w/o the EGR



Thanks

.....And sorry if i Hijacked the thread http://www.technovelocity.com/chevyh...-fire manifold
Others have removed the EGR channel on the basis of additional plenum volume. I never did this. I added plenum volume with a top lid spacer of 5/16". And I think the main benefit of the spacer is that it helps to straighten the a/f flow to the runners. Using a plenum lid spacer, it raises the point at where the TB sits. The air/fuel doesn't slam into the floor of the manifold. Grinding back part of the roof of the runners helps make the air/fuel flow path more direct into the runner itself.
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 01:37 AM
  #173  
schrade's Avatar
schrade
Safety Car
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 0
From: :45 minutes from everywhere / E-I-E-I-O
Default

Originally Posted by scooter18155
also noticed on the matchbox car it looks to have t tops rather then a targa top.
C4 was originally designed to have a T-top.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 01:51 PM
  #174  
Marty Bee's Avatar
Marty Bee
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Lively ON
Default

Originally Posted by jhammons01
Wow, Harsh words for one of the most reliable C4s.

I am not sure if you want to run sub 10s.........

If you want to look out for things on your car. You need to focus your eyes on the 'other' components. And by that you'll need to start looking at the rear wheel bearings, half shafts, and U-joints. All together there are 4 U-joints, replace them all if you can't find where the PO already did.

The Master cylinder will go, wait for a Hot day and you may experience blow by. The MC is a 1 hour job if you don't count the time pulling the plastic cups off your old MC and getting them onto the new MC. It is an easy Job.

The rear wheel bearings are probably out of spec by now. Search for a thread on the subject by JrRifleCoach. If you have a shutter that you can't pinpoint it most likely is a wheel bearing or.......

The suspension durometors have all deteriorated. All the bushings need to be replaced, there is a kit for ~$90 that has everything you need. Just understand that it leads to a lot of labor. For instance, GM sells a the rear Dogbones for ~$45 each and it takes minutes to pull one off and replace as it is held on by two nuts......but the bushings are fractions of the cost. You have to press the old ones out and replace. The real is not near as hard as the front setup.

Do you have an Auto or 4+3 tranny? That is a whole different post.

Your Dash will start blinking....that is a grounding issue. Could be the solder has gotten old and cracked on the PCB or the connectors have corroded. Worse case is the dash is really dim and the Turn signals and bright light (blue) indicator are real bright.

Your Headlights will stop flipping up or down. Don't fret this one. There are plastic gears inside that strip out over 22 years. putting new gears in there will take about an hour each side. Basically pulling out the motor and cracking it open to expose the gears is all it takes. pull out the old ones and put in the new ones........put it all back together, Done.

Make sure you check your Spark Plug wire looms (the plastic doodads that hold your wires in place). If they are old and brittle it won't be long until your wires fall and contact each other or exhaust components creating a "CrossFire" that is not by design. Buy new Looms and the really thick Plug wires and replace all that right now.

The Valve covers are leaking about 1/8 of a quart of oil for every tank of gas. If you have an oil leak check there first.

The radiator is being choked for airflow by all the trash that is in between it and the condenser. Your engine will run a little hot due to this. There is a shroud covering both and is held in place by the coolant hoses. When you flush and change the hoses, make sure you pull the shroud off and clean out in between them. Do this before any drastic changes to address the heat issues.......like a lower Temp Thermostat.

I'm sure I'll think of other things but that is enough to spend the first year of ownership of an '84.

Ok, you don't understand how freaked out I am. I bought mine last year and I, almost, word for work, did that last summer...

Add the power steering rack blowing up inside and trashing the pump, you've got yourself a fully years work.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 04:15 PM
  #175  
86GoldProject's Avatar
86GoldProject
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton New Jersey
Default

These posts always get to me.. I especially hate when people say sell the car and buy a different car.. it's especially laughable when they tell you to upgrade to a tpi car.. Here are the facts, your cfi car is a CORVETTE. IT has a chevy small block in it, one of the most common and supported engines in the aftermarket pars business. Sure there might not be a whole lot of support for the crossfire itself but so what? Its just an induction system.. port the heck out of the base, do what you can with it, upgrade to an x-ram, if it doesn't suit your needs upgrade to something else (NOT tpi), don't sell your whole car just because of the induction system on it. Sorry for the rant these posts get to me.. I hate people bashing on these cars and I really hate the suggestion to sell your car and buy a different car, what it comes down to is it's a small block chevy and there are so many different things you can do and change to taylor fit it to your needs. Keep your car, upgrade it in a way that makes you happy. In the end you'll love it more than something that you simply bought.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #176  
Dgatto's Avatar
Dgatto
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: KINGS PARK NY
Default

Originally Posted by bhepp
I recently just joined and recently got a corvette, The one thing I was wondering about is the cross fire injection. Does anyone know of any problems to watch for in the future or is it a good set up. I heard its not the best and wanted to know what you guys think. Thanks
I owned an 84' with crossfire..... cant get enough gas into the motoer to do any real mods........very lame intake. The tuned port in the 85' was so much better.

Just my $.02
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #177  
Tom400CFI's Avatar
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,543
Likes: 3,216
From: Park City Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Dgatto
I owned an 84' with crossfire..... cant get enough gas into the motoer to do any real mods........very lame intake. The tuned port in the 85' was so much better.

Just my $.02
You didn't define "real mods" but based on your extremely brief and unhelpful (to the OP) post, I'd say that you must not have tried hard enough, b/c "enough fuel" isn't that hard to come by, in my experience.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To 84 cross fire

Old Jun 2, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #178  
JD'S WHITE 93's Avatar
JD'S WHITE 93
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,488
Likes: 1,352
Default

I got a great idea !!! Swap over to a L98 set up and then once that's done you can swap over to a LTX manifold The guys rambling about how much better the L98 is are delusional. Yes it's superior however all the assache involved to swap over to a different intake that hits a wall @ 4500 rpm is funny. If it were mine I would mod the Crossfire set up. I do not see the purpose in spending alot of money to "upgrade"

Last edited by JD'S WHITE 93; Jun 2, 2008 at 08:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #179  
85vette-84vette's Avatar
85vette-84vette
Pro
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 694
Likes: 1
From: Spokane WA
Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Sorresso
BTW, where the fuel is sprayed on a TBI system is NOT the throttle plates. A properly functioning TB injector has a cone like spray meant to distribute the fuel onto the wall of the venturi just above the throttle plate. The air rushing past the fuel "shears" it off the wall and that's how it ends up in suspension. Just another Xfire/TBI factoid for those not familiar with how it works.
No you are wrong on my 84 the injectors spray on the plates at idle, yours must be plugged or something, good luck in getting it down the track in a hurry with that little amount of fuel sticking to the side walls.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #180  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,303
Likes: 714
From: Bartlett IL
Default

Originally Posted by 85vette-84vette
No you are wrong on my 84 the injectors spray on the plates at idle, yours must be plugged or something, good luck in getting it down the track in a hurry with that little amount of fuel sticking to the side walls.
Mine ran a 13.37 and trapped at 104.5mph with those "plugged" injectors. If yours are spraying on the plates at idle, I'd look for new injectors.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 PM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE