C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

421 Build. A few changes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #1  
88BlackZ-51's Avatar
88BlackZ-51
Thread Starter
Race Director
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,749
Likes: 41
Default 421 Build. A few changes.

Most of you know I have changed my mind several times in regards to what engine to build. Last year I had my mind set on a 383, but was somewhat screwed over by the engine builder who was located outside of Rome NY.

Since then Jim and I decided that 421 cubes was the way to go. The build has been going flawless except my lifters for the bowtie block have been on backorder for approx. 6 weeks now.


I have since been talking to Tony from AFR who has recommended that I sell the 195cc AFR street ports, and go with the 195cc AFR competition ports. He advices that the comp ports will raise the power band approx. 20 hp. I will be also ditching the 230/230 cam and going with a split duration 236/242 on a 113 lobe seperation. I am in no hurry in getting this finished as my wife is expecting in 4 weeks, and we are buying tons of baby things.


Our goals with the old combo was approx. 430rwhp/450rwtq. With the new combo, We are aiming at more like 460rwhp/445rwtq with excellent street manners. I personally would love to see 470rwhp, but I doubt it. For your information, these new heads will be flowed as so were my AFR 1040's. I find it incredibly that there is a 195cc head on the market that will flow 300cfm/225cfm. With that kick *** port velocity of the comp ports this thing is going to have crazy power under the curve.

When I get the heads flowed I will post the numbers.


There is a lot of thought that goes into a build when it's from scratch. I am very greatful to have Tony and Jim by myside to assist me in making decisions. It will be very interesting to see how this thing performs.


Beach Bum. Could you post the predicted 1/4 mile times with the 3.45 gears?


Have a good one guys!

Last edited by 88BlackZ-51; Aug 25, 2008 at 04:16 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #2  
jsup's Avatar
jsup
Team Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 35,065
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

You should really do a 427, you're leaving power on the table.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #3  
5abivt's Avatar
5abivt
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,659
Likes: 82
From: Toronto ontario
Default

Great choice With better flowing heads and still a small port volume for the cubic inches I think you will definitely gain all across the board.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 12:30 AM
  #4  
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
0Tony Mamo @ AFR
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 7
From: Valencia CA
Default

Originally Posted by jsup
You should really do a 427, you're leaving power on the table.
Actually, only torque which he will have plenty of (a 427 will make about 8 more ft/lbs). A bigger motor doesn't guarantee more HP, only a little more low/midrange TQ (assuming the same induction and exhaust which really governs how much air you can move and the HP the engine is capable of generating).

Even a 406 would make similar power (with the same intake, heads, and exhaust) but it wont make as much torque (down some 25 ft/lbs from the 427) . The smaller motor just makes the power slightly higher in the RPM band.

The difference between a 421 and a 427 will be negligible on the street and it would run the same at the track. With street tires it may just help get the power hooked a little quicker....at some point you have so much torque your losing races to cars with 100 less horsepower because you can't put the power to the ground. That can get frustrating after roasting the hides at will in any of the lower gears starts to lose its lustre....LOL

I'm looking forward to seeing the new combo come together....it should be very docile yet really rip when you lay into it. A perfect street combo...



Tony
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 01:25 AM
  #5  
Beach Bum's Avatar
Beach Bum
Safety Car
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 16
From: Little Elm TX
Default

Actually, with his 4.155" bore, if he moved from the 3.875" stroke to a 4.00" stroke crank, he would have a 434 sbc, not the 427. jsup, you must be staying with the 4.125" bore with a 4.00" stroke, which is a 427.....

I don't remember what the sim said on your set-up, I didn't save it.... If I remember right, on your street tires, it was somewhere around mid 11's at well over 120 mph..... which might take some practice considering you have a manual transmission coupled with your street tires, but very doable.....

Last edited by Beach Bum; Aug 24, 2008 at 01:27 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 01:41 AM
  #6  
88BlackZ-51's Avatar
88BlackZ-51
Thread Starter
Race Director
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,749
Likes: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Beach Bum
Actually, with his 4.155" bore, if he moved from the 3.875" stroke to a 4.00" stroke crank, he would have a 434 sbc, not the 427. jsup, you must be staying with the 4.125" bore with a 4.00" stroke, which is a 427.....

I don't remember what the sim said on your set-up, I didn't save it.... If I remember right, on your street tires, it was somewhere around mid 11's at well over 120 mph..... which might take some practice considering you have a manual transmission coupled with your street tires, but very doable.....
I saved it Beach. Just can't cut and paste right now. Thanks btw!!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 03:23 AM
  #7  
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
0Tony Mamo @ AFR
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 7
From: Valencia CA
Default

Assuming perhaps conservatively 570 at the flywheel and a raceweight of 3750 w/ driver (not sure what your car weighs), it should run a trap speed of 121 MPH and with street tires likely ET around 11.50.....low elevens with ET streets, or ET street radials on a decent prepped track. A couple of tick's behind the MUCH lighter C6Z06 (which actually makes a little less power and not even close to the low/midrange torque and response you will have). The huge weight disparity is whats killing you....

Is my guess on the weight of your car close or off by a country mile?

Tony
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 07:08 AM
  #8  
jsup's Avatar
jsup
Team Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 35,065
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
Actually, only torque which he will have plenty of (a 427 will make about 8 more ft/lbs). A bigger motor doesn't guarantee more HP, only a little more low/midrange TQ (assuming the same induction and exhaust which really governs how much air you can move and the HP the engine is capable of generating).

Even a 406 would make similar power (with the same intake, heads, and exhaust) but it wont make as much torque (down some 25 ft/lbs from the 427) . The smaller motor just makes the power slightly higher in the RPM band.

The difference between a 421 and a 427 will be negligible on the street and it would run the same at the track. With street tires it may just help get the power hooked a little quicker....at some point you have so much torque your losing races to cars with 100 less horsepower because you can't put the power to the ground. That can get frustrating after roasting the hides at will in any of the lower gears starts to lose its lustre....LOL

I'm looking forward to seeing the new combo come together....it should be very docile yet really rip when you lay into it. A perfect street combo...



Tony
Hey Tony, thanks for the response. I was just giving Ricky a hard time. Joking.... but thanks for the information, it is interesting, and kinda makes my point.

Last edited by jsup; Aug 24, 2008 at 07:38 AM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every Model vs Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things C8 Corvette Owners Hate (But Won't Tell You)

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

10 Best Corvettes Coming to Barrett-Jackson Palm Beach 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Every Corvette Grand Sport Explained! (C2, C4, C6, C7, & C8)

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Grand Sport & Grand Sport X Launch Alongside All-New 535hp LS6 V8!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

5 Reasons Bad Drivers Crash & 5 Ways to Avoid a Costly Mistake!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 07:23 AM
  #9  
Vette Threat's Avatar
Vette Threat
Burning Brakes
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by 88BlackZ-51
Most of you know I have changed my mind several times in regards to what engine to build. Last year I had my mind set on a 383, but was somewhat screwed over by the engine builder who was located outside of Rome NY. Since then Jim and I decided that 421 cubes was the way to go. The build has been going flawless except my lifters for the bowtie block have been on backorder for approx. 6 weeks now. I have since been talking to Tony from AFR who has recommended that I sell the 195cc AFR street ports, and go with the 195cc AFR competition ports. He advices that the comp ports will raise the power band approx. 20 hp. I will be also ditching the 230/230 cam and going with a split duration 236/242 on a 113 lobe seperation. I am in no hurry in getting this finished as my wife is expecting in 4 weeks, and we are buying tons of baby things. Our goals with the old combo was approx. 430rwhp/450rwtq. With the new combo, We are aiming at more like 460rwhp/445rwtq with excellent street manners. I personally would love to see 470rwhp, but I doubt it. For your information, these new heads will be flowed as so were my AFR 1040's. I find it incredibly that there is a 195cc head on the market that will flow 300cfm/225cfm. With that kick *** port velocity of the comp ports this thing is going to have crazy power under the curve. When I get the heads flowed I will post the numbers. There is a lot of thought that goes into a build when it's from scratch. I am very greatful to have Tony and Jim by myside to assist me in making decisions. It will be very interesting to see how this thing performs. Beach Bum. Could you post the predicted 1/4 mile times with the 3.45 gears? Have a good one guys!

Now we're talkin!!


The comp port + 236/242 cam I agree should break 450RWHP and hit 125MPH



My car hit 119MPH with no cool down on a hot sticky day making only 405RWHP 3600lbs race weight with only 2 passes so Im sure you should hit 125 no problem.

*update* I knew my 393 short block was hurtin and holding back my AFRheads/cam combo so I decided to pull the motor out last week. THE RINGS WERE COMPLETELY FRIED!!!! No crosshatch left at all either!!!

Shes getting fresh bearings, rings, block machined and a cam in the 240/246 range to replace my 230/236 cam.

Should be at the track late September and we'll see what those heads are REALLY made of!

I'm thinking a little more then 405RWHP this time around.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #10  
88BlackZ-51's Avatar
88BlackZ-51
Thread Starter
Race Director
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,749
Likes: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
Assuming perhaps conservatively 570 at the flywheel and a raceweight of 3750 w/ driver (not sure what your car weighs), it should run a trap speed of 121 MPH and with street tires likely ET around 11.50.....low elevens with ET streets, or ET street radials on a decent prepped track. A couple of tick's behind the MUCH lighter C6Z06 (which actually makes a little less power and not even close to the low/midrange torque and response you will have). The huge weight disparity is whats killing you....

Is my guess on the weight of your car close or off by a country mile?

Tony
Raceweight of about 3500 w/driver.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #11  
Aurora40's Avatar
Aurora40
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,413
Likes: 9
From: The Old Dominion
Default

Not to sound like a jerk, but wouldn't it make more sense to come up with some power and cost goals, and then build an engine to that?

If you sell parts to get different ones every time you realize more power will be had, well that can go on forever. Unless your goal is to have the most powerful C4 ever built, or to spend the most money on unused parts, this seems like a poor strategy?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #12  
jsup's Avatar
jsup
Team Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 35,065
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Aurora40
Not to sound like a jerk, but wouldn't it make more sense to come up with some power and cost goals, and then build an engine to that?

If you sell parts to get different ones every time you realize more power will be had, well that can go on forever. Unless your goal is to have the most powerful C4 ever built, or to spend the most money on unused parts, this seems like a poor strategy?
Crazy talk.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 10:51 AM
  #13  
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
0Tony Mamo @ AFR
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 7
From: Valencia CA
Default

Originally Posted by 88BlackZ-51
Raceweight of about 3500 w/driver.
Should trap closer to 124 then.....11.30's on a good run with street tires (2.0's sixty foot) and loooow elevens on a DOT cheater slick. May even run mid elevens on a regular radial....traction is going to be a serious issue. Trap speed wont change much however (a direct indicator of power to weight) as its not effected much by the first 100 feet of the run.

That puts the car door to door with new C6Z06 in a chase down the freeway...

-Tony
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #14  
Iroc57's Avatar
Iroc57
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 1
From: Warwick RI
Default

Originally Posted by jsup
Crazy talk.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #15  
95wht6spd's Avatar
95wht6spd
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,633
Likes: 324
From: Greenville SC
Default

Good decision, I think the other heads and cam were to small.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #16  
makn u shiver's Avatar
makn u shiver
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 545
Likes: 2
From: st albert alberta
Default

88blackz-51 this thing is very close to my build ,are you waiting to for the comp cams 8953-16 also ? mine have been on order for 2 months and nothing yet .Tony from afr is a awesome guy he has helped me out big time when he really didn't have to ,what he did for me will never be forgotten .it just proves what i have known all along that hands down afr makes the best performance cylinder head in the world and no one else even comes close imo and there customer service is second to none .
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #17  
USAsOnlyWay's Avatar
USAsOnlyWay
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,270
Likes: 3
From: Seattle Area WA
Default

Originally Posted by Aurora40
If you sell parts to get different ones every time you realize more power will be had, well that can go on forever. Unless your goal is to have the most powerful C4 ever built, or to spend the most money on unused parts, this seems like a poor strategy?
I actually would have to disagree. With you on two counts.

1) He did, but since he has had so much down time and a slow build he has had WAY too much time to change his mind.

2) What I actually disagree is with your second comment (quoted above.) In my experience, there are very few who actually build a motor and say, ahh thats it. Most, especially those on here, build/mod a motor and say, damn thats quick...I wonder what _____ would do with it. So in contrast, by selling the heads now, unused he is eliminating 20-30% of that 50% depreciation parts seem to have once they are used (even barely at all.)

In other words, by selling them now while they are worth more he is actually spending less money and time than he would in the long run if he ran the motor and then swapped em out anyway.

Yes, there is a reason why I know this to be true.

Looking forward to seeing your results!
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To 421 Build. A few changes.

Old Aug 24, 2008 | 04:41 PM
  #18  
jsup's Avatar
jsup
Team Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 35,065
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by USAsOnlyWay
I actually would have to disagree. With you on two counts.

1) He did, but since he has had so much down time and a slow build he has had WAY too much time to change his mind.

2) What I actually disagree is with your second comment (quoted above.) In my experience, there are very few who actually build a motor and say, ahh thats it. Most, especially those on here, build/mod a motor and say, damn thats quick...I wonder what _____ would do with it. So in contrast, by selling the heads now, unused he is eliminating 20-30% of that 50% depreciation parts seem to have once they are used (even barely at all.)

In other words, by selling them now while they are worth more he is actually spending less money and time than he would in the long run if he ran the motor and then swapped em out anyway.

Yes, there is a reason why I know this to be true.

Looking forward to seeing your results!
Oh no, I do not believe that is the case at all. I believe that with research and a clear plan you can build something once and get what you want. Now, of course, things to manifest themselves in real life as they do on paper, however.....you can get fairly close.

This isn't, IMO a case of too long a build, it's a case of marketing over substance. Seems the builder is now in control, I hope, and some good advice he is giving is being adhered to. Otherwise, with the next best thing being marketed, we'd see yet another change.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #19  
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
0Tony Mamo @ AFR
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 7
From: Valencia CA
Default

Originally Posted by jsup
Oh no, I do not believe that is the case at all. I believe that with research and a clear plan you can build something once and get what you want. Now, of course, things to manifest themselves in real life as they do on paper, however.....you can get fairly close.

This isn't, IMO a case of too long a build, it's a case of marketing over substance. Seems the builder is now in control, I hope, and some good advice he is giving is being adhered to. Otherwise, with the next best thing being marketed, we'd see yet another change.
You two guys seriously need to get to the same track together when all this hoopala clears and both of you have finished your projects....I think all of us might be willing to donate some cash to pay for the gas and transportation fees....the entertainment value of the ensuing results would be worth every penny.

The race goes down at "high noon".....LOL

The performance related Internet boards....a soap opera for men

-Tony
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #20  
jsup's Avatar
jsup
Team Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 35,065
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, NJ Democrats, doing for the country what they did for Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
You two guys seriously need to get to the same track together when all this hoopala clears and both of you have finished your projects....I think all of us might be willing to donate some cash to pay for the gas and transportation fees....the entertainment value of the ensuing results would be worth every penny.

The race goes down at "high noon".....LOL

The performance related Internet boards....a soap opera for men

-Tony


Great response.... I will be ready after my D44 and trans upgrade. I'm about $4K away.

Last edited by jsup; Aug 24, 2008 at 05:18 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.

story-0
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every Model vs Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-20 17:58:41


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-3
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things C8 Corvette Owners Hate (But Won't Tell You)

Slideshow: 10 things C8 Corvette owners hate, but won't tell you.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-01 18:36:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Corvettes Coming to Barrett-Jackson Palm Beach 2026!

Slideshow: Should you add one of these incredible Corvettes to your garage?

By Brett Foote | 2026-04-01 18:14:05


VIEW MORE
story-7
Every Corvette Grand Sport Explained! (C2, C4, C6, C7, & C8)

Slideshow: Every Corvette Grand Sport explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-03-26 07:13:44


VIEW MORE
story-8
Grand Sport & Grand Sport X Launch Alongside All-New 535hp LS6 V8!

Slideshow: Breaking down the 2027 Grand Sport, Grand Sport X, Stingray, and LS6 V8.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-03-26 13:48:45


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons Bad Drivers Crash & 5 Ways to Avoid a Costly Mistake!

Slideshow: 5 reasons bad drivers crash sports cars & 5 ways to avoid a costly shame!

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-03-25 16:32:55


VIEW MORE