MAF Screen removed
Unrelated is all the questions posted with issues owners are having with their cars. After I purchased mine the next purchase were the Helm Manuals on the engine and body. Without the information contained in those books I would never attempt to dive into anything as the consequences can be expensive.
Unrelated is all the questions posted with issues owners are having with their cars. After I purchased mine the next purchase were the Helm Manuals on the engine and body. Without the information contained in those books I would never attempt to dive into anything as the consequences can be expensive.
Wound up going lean intermittently and eventually blowing the head gasket. Car always felt fine but wasnt til I tried dynoing it and saw the A/F ration figured it out.
Id never do it again
.It sure moves some big air though..
...WW
Last edited by WW7; May 16, 2014 at 01:31 PM.
You can gain up to 100 cfm in air flow with screens deleted,obviously the thin wire inside the MAF is exposed to the risk of brekage.I think if the Maf is factory "tuned" to return back a voltage vs x airflow,if you add +100cfm to the max voltage you have an unexpected amount of air into the air fuel mix .Does the ECM work on the injectors pulse width to compensate for a lean condition?
Last edited by tunedport85inject; May 16, 2014 at 02:50 PM.





The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
plastic fins basically straighten the flow into the bore and the thin screens make it uniform

Last edited by tunedport85inject; May 16, 2014 at 03:27 PM.
im tempted to put a screen back on the front of my maf just to see what happens.
At the end of the day tho it depends on what sort of driving you are doing, a screened maf is going to be good for street driving, but anyone who tracks their car will give up some smooth off idle control for that 25% more air flow, especially if their air intake is modified.
what we need now is someone who tracks their car to do back to back runs, with and without a front screen to see if there is any real world difference ?
im tempted to put a screen back on the front of my maf just to see what happens.
At the end of the day tho it depends on what sort of driving you are doing, a screened maf is going to be good for street driving, but anyone who tracks their car will give up some smooth off idle control for that 25% more air flow, especially if their air intake is modified.
what we need now is someone who tracks their car to do back to back runs, with and without a front screen to see if there is any real world difference ?
it would be interesting to have a back to back comparison under those circumstances ?
if you were drag racing it would be better off with no screens.

It's the blowerworks model, Greg Carroll "the owner" was a great help in getting it hooked up to use in my 89...A new stock Bosch unit is $735.00, it only cost me $75.00 to replace the MAF stick in mine if it ever goes bad....
....Tequilaboy "Pat Cardy" did the insert of the bin files into my tune for me.. This MAF unit is awesome,car runs and idles perfectly, plus unlike the stock unit it's pretty much unbreakable.. You can throw it on the ground and kick it around and it will still work, no flimsy wire to break....
....
....WW
Last edited by WW7; May 17, 2014 at 12:22 PM.
I think that whole de screen bit was a hack move by some tuner (hmm) back in the80s that didnt do their homework.





Mine 383 is tuned for my descreened MAF. I wouldn't expect a bump in performance by adding screens. Also, my idle/off-idle throttle response is off-the-charts. Of course, that's aided by a mechanically advanced cam -- but it also doesn't seem to be "hurt" with the descreening either.
When I look at the videos of the two options, it's not even clear what we are looking at. Personally, I think the pink represents turbulence. Without a screen their is less turbulence as the air flows thru. Doesn't tell us anything else, right?
I'd be reluctant to categorize the people who figure out bins and measure components -- to improve performance as "hacks". Yes...some proceed w/o enough thought. Others, provide the rest of us with valuable information. This thread would be an example.
Experimentation is good. Thinking outside the box is too....
Try this one...Why isn't WWF's oversize MAF screened -- if the screen is SO important?
Mine 383 is tuned for my descreened MAF. I wouldn't expect a bump in performance by adding screens. Also, my idle/off-idle throttle response is off-the-charts. Of course, that's aided by a mechanically advanced cam -- but it also doesn't seem to be "hurt" with the descreening either.
When I look at the videos of the two options, it's not even clear what we are looking at. Personally, I think the pink represents turbulence. Without a screen their is less turbulence as the air flows thru. Doesn't tell us anything else, right?
I'd be reluctant to categorize the people who figure out bins and measure components -- to improve performance as "hacks". Yes...some proceed w/o enough thought. Others, provide the rest of us with valuable information. This thread would be an example.
Experimentation is good. Thinking outside the box is too....
Try this one...Why isn't WWF's oversize MAF screened -- if the screen is SO important?

Well said..........Yes and for that matter, any of the newer platforms do not utilize screens, my brothers' 03 Cobra, utilizes a very large screenless MAF, and I believe the newer generation platforms, LSX.....do not utilize the screens either.....I would tend to believe this was something early in the electronic multiport fuel injection days GM utilized to overthink of keeping the wires and other elements in MAF's safe. The guys at TPIS not only take out the screens but also file down the other elements in there, although ALOT of care must be taken when performing that task.





http://www.gmtuners.com/pda/flow.htm
Anyone considering a bump to a 52/58mm SHOULD be looking at their MAF and/or air box first.
I find it surprising that the OP saw a bump -- of the car is stock.
Two different trains of thought....modifying for more power versus descreening for stock improvement. I would consider (guess) the later fairly fruitless.













