Exhaust note question please

I did it specifically to eliminate the individual cylinder firing sound (like an old V8 boat, IMO) that my C6 exhibited. I TOTALLY FAILED in my mission at the time, but set out to do the same thing with my 'Vette Kart project and feel that I totally succeeded. A "curvey" exhaust dramatically reduces that individual cylinder firing sound, leaving what I consider to be a "delicious, bubbly" V8 exhaust sound. So, straight piping with minimal bends helps with what you want, I believe.
Quicker and more attainable however is to retard your ignition timing at idle. The more you retard it, the more you'll hear the individual cylinders firing. It works and the effect is dramatic.


EDIT: Sorry, IDK what that rattling sound is, but it really interferes with the actual sound. Try to ignore that, whatever it is.

.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Aug 5, 2018 at 10:09 PM.

https://youtu.be/QyMz0vhhtuU
EDIT: Sorry, IDK what that rattling sound is, but it really interferes with the actual sound. Try to ignore that, whatever it is.

.
I definitely have been able to get more of a 70's idle sound by lowering my rpm to 550. Funny, in drive that is stock anyhow, its only in park that the idle is cranked up to 750. I think this is to meet emissions requirements at idle in park. Just a guess.. I have a very slight hunt as well.. which I think I can tune out.
Ive noted that oil pressure is fine at 550 by the way.
I definitely have been able to get more of a 70's idle sound by lowering my rpm to 550. Funny, in drive that is stock anyhow, its only in park that the idle is cranked up to 750. I think this is to meet emissions requirements at idle in park. Just a guess.. I have a very slight hunt as well.. which I think I can tune out.
Ive noted that oil pressure is fine at 550 by the way.
What ^this guys^ said. He "gets it"..
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Aug 6, 2018 at 10:16 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Id go so far as to say any crossover will dumb down that strong sound guys are looking for especially if theres a cam in it. Any glasspack type muffler really accentuates it.
Obviously compression and the right cam profile will really do the trick but if its stock one can only pull a little timing and add some fuel to fake it.
What ^this guys^ said. He "gets it".Ahhh....did you watch the video? The idle did drop initially...but then it came back up (just like the LT1 would do). I even throttled it a little. The sound is, I'd say, "dramatically different". Much more rough and you can hear each cylinder firing much more clearly. When I advance the timing, it mellows way out, gets smoother and the cylinder sounds run together, leaving just a smooth 'bubbly' V8 sound (which I prefer).
.
I cannot go below zero degrees with my software. Its possible you are going below zero. I dont hear any significant difference, I will throw my timing light on it to confirm Im changing the advance.
I cannot go below zero degrees with my software. Its possible you are going below zero. I don't hear any significant difference, I will throw my timing light on it to confirm Im changing the advance.
Im going to play around some more and see what I can do. There might be a way to force it below zero. there are like 16 zillion parameters on that damn computer.





I definitely have been able to get more of a 70's idle sound by lowering my rpm to 550. Funny, in drive that is stock anyhow, its only in park that the idle is cranked up to 750. I think this is to meet emissions requirements at idle in park. Just a guess.. I have a very slight hunt as well.. which I think I can tune out.
Ive noted that oil pressure is fine at 550 by the way.
I agree with the assessment idle can't be forced by rotating a distributor. The ECM is programmed to hit a specific RPM. You can't change that except reprogramming. Rotation of a distributor will retard timing but do so at all loads/rpms. I question the "wisdom" of retarding the timing (especially severely) for the goals stated in this thread. I might not be as skeptical if the change was ONLY for idle -- which may be the point? Otherwise, retardation of timing would lead to less responsiveness (esp. off-idle) while risking premature failure of CATS or overheated manifolds. All of this in exchange for gettting a "cool sound"? Really?
The addition of an "H"/"Y" pipe doubles the pulses coming out of each dual pipe. That's why it smooths sound....more pulses. More bends may do the same but who picks more bends -- which would translate to more restriction? Has ANYONE said how cool "Side Effects" sidepipes are -- which all their bends? Looks maybe....Sound maybe...but overwhelmingly forum users would question the wisdom of installing a (presumably) more restrictive exhaust in exchange for sound/looks. This statement comes from someone who "gets" looks/sound as a criteria -- in addition to performance.
Ironically, this thread seems like a debate between the appeal of individual pulsing of an aggressive V8 muscle car vs the more sophisticated? "Euro" sound of fine sportscars. I would add that diameter, length, and muffler contribute heavily to the overall sound. Even in the comparison of a LS Vette vs. GTO, I didn't see anything mentioned about mufflers used. Or converters for that matter.
I'm all for chasing all the intrinsic aspects of owning a sportscar. Maybe we all want something a bit (better?) or different all the time. With 2.5" piping and lots of bends, mine might be more the sound Tom likes. I've liked it for a long time. I also wonder how much different, enjoyable, aggressive it might be with straight-thru 3" exhaust. Any change is fun for a while. I just wouldn't change timing to get it....especially to the extremes suggested here.
https://youtu.be/M60BuntVp6E
mine was a stock replacement really, look up the specs of an 89 l98. I believe the first year of the lt1 shares the same profile. It's been a while.
I dont know enough to say what those cam specs mean, Im sure someone will chime in.
Can you describe "crap" please?











