C5 Forced Induction/Nitrous C5 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Centrifugal, Twin Screw & Roots Blowers, Twin Turbo Kits, Intercoolers, Wet & Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PTK TT update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #221  
Shinobi'sZ's Avatar
Shinobi'sZ
Le Mans Master
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,976
Likes: 527
From: Clouds Over California
Default

Originally Posted by RoadRebel
An example on the Tti X at 9psi it typically makes 600 rwhpish.
Phil
What car (346cid) through stock cats and 91 octane put down 600rwhp???? I saw Noobs dyno results on his 383cid and 94 octane. When I look back on his thread, he made like 540rwhp @9lbs and then an additional 60rwhp with the Catback change..that was a significant improvement.

I thought you told me you did not make over 600rwhp on your car @9lbs of boost. I wish we had 94 octane out here..it is like the difference between tuning with 87-89 and 91 where I am at, compared to tuning with 94 over 91. I could get 100 octane at the Unocal 76 out here..but I don't want to have to do that everytime I fill up.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 02:19 PM
  #222  
RoadRebel's Avatar
RoadRebel
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 10
From: Macomb MI
Default

My car makes over 600 (no cats full exhaust) to the tires at 9psi and noobs will also even thru the cats when its all said and done. I have attached my 9psi sheet. I pulled out of testing early with a valvetrain issue up top as you can see.


Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #223  
Shinobi'sZ's Avatar
Shinobi'sZ
Le Mans Master
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,976
Likes: 527
From: Clouds Over California
Default

Originally Posted by RoadRebel
My car makes over 600 (no cats full exhaust) to the tires at 9psi and noobs will also even thru the cats when its all said and done. I have attached my 9psi sheet. I pulled out of testing early with a valvetrain issue up top as you can see.



Thanks for sharing....gives me a good baseline and actually makes me feel better about my results. I am thinking with no cats and tuning on Sunoco 94...our results would be real close @9lbs. However I am not sure what your cam profile looks like and your CR @9.2 is most likely better at 9lbs then my 8.9 CR..especially being able to use the 94 octane in preventing detonation.

For 9lbs I am going to maintain the 91 tune and then turn on the boost controller with straight 100 octane and 14lbs to see what whe will do.

Got a different question for you. I was talking to one of the Aussie's who does Speed Density tuning. He told me if you don't have cats, you can actaully retard the timing off boost and it will spool the turbos up faster...you buy that?

Lastly what is the eraser mark on your dyno sheet
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #224  
Tony @ MPH's Avatar
Tony @ MPH
Supporting Vendor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 2
From: http://www.mphparts.com 800-364-1975
Default

Originally Posted by Shinobi'sZ
What car (346cid) through stock cats and 91 octane put down 600rwhp???? I saw Noobs dyno results on his 383cid and 94 octane.
Not to split hairs, but it was on 93 octane

When I look back on his thread, he made like 540rwhp @9lbs and then an additional 60rwhp with the Catback change..that was a significant improvement.
Again, not splitting hairs... but when it was making 540rwhp the boost was falling off the charts up top. So it was like 540rwhp on 7psi I can't explain that phenomena directly, but Mike felt the stock Ti exhaust was just too restrictive and was causing a flow issue. 608rwhp through cats @ 9psi right now.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #225  
VETZILLA's Avatar
VETZILLA
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 1
From: South Lyon MI
Default

Originally Posted by Shinobi'sZ

Lastly what is the eraser mark on your dyno sheet

Just guessing but he probably penciled in what he thought the graph should look like without the valve train problem as opposed to how it turned out. I got a few laying around where I did the same thing.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 05:15 PM
  #226  
Shinobi'sZ's Avatar
Shinobi'sZ
Le Mans Master
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,976
Likes: 527
From: Clouds Over California
Default

Originally Posted by diynoob
Not to split hairs, but it was on 93 octane



Again, not splitting hairs... but when it was making 540rwhp the boost was falling off the charts up top. So it was like 540rwhp on 7psi I can't explain that phenomena directly, but Mike felt the stock Ti exhaust was just too restrictive and was causing a flow issue. 608rwhp through cats @ 9psi right now.
No splitting I think you are right where you should be with a 383cid @9lbs of boost with 93 octane. Its interesting to see Phil's dyno run at 9lbs of boost with a 346cid and Sunoco 94...almost the same numbers...Could make a stronger arguement for removing the cats. If you are running stock cats and removed them..you might be at 668rwhp at 9lbs..
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #227  
RoadRebel's Avatar
RoadRebel
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 10
From: Macomb MI
Default

Originally Posted by Shinobi'sZ
I am thinking with no cats and tuning on Sunoco 94...our results would be real close @9lbs. However I am not sure what your cam profile looks like and your CR @9.2 is most likely better at 9lbs then my 8.9 CR..especially being able to use the 94 octane in preventing detonation.
Got a different question for you. I was talking to one of the Aussie's who does Speed Density tuning. He told me if you don't have cats, you can actaully retard the timing off boost and it will spool the turbos up faster...you buy that?
Lastly what is the eraser mark on your dyno sheet
Take your cats off and put 94 in and give it a shot 100hp is a lot to find
I am more prone to detonation at 9.2 then your 8.9..so you can wash some of the octane theory a bit as 9psi on 91 isnt that horrible. Anytime you want to stop on by for some real fuel I will point ya in the right direction .

As for the Aussies, thats old news as any competent tuner knows this. Heck read back as to what I posted in my last 3 or 4 posts in tuning and timing. It works both ways , If you add timing and run it leaner is softens it up.

The eraser is actually where I tried to pencil in the profile of what the power cure might have been had the valvetrain not gone into resonance.

Phil
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #228  
Shinobi'sZ's Avatar
Shinobi'sZ
Le Mans Master
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,976
Likes: 527
From: Clouds Over California
Default

Originally Posted by VETZILLA
Just guessing but he probably penciled in what he thought the graph should look like without the valve train problem as opposed to how it turned out. I got a few laying around where I did the same thing.
Me too..but it was do to lost signal on the dyno.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #229  
Shinobi'sZ's Avatar
Shinobi'sZ
Le Mans Master
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,976
Likes: 527
From: Clouds Over California
Default

Originally Posted by RoadRebel
Take your cats off and put 94 in and give it a shot 100hp is a lot to find

Phil

60 is a lot less than 100. Being able to add timing makes a big difference. I don't even know that I trust that our 91 octane is really 91...but I can get Sunoco 104 too..I just have to buy it in 5 gallon buckets. I trust the Unocal 100 octane though.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #230  
babala65's Avatar
babala65
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 763
Likes: 1
From: Brownstown Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Shinobi'sZ
I would wait Nick...I really would. You don't want to be stuck with something that does not work the way you want it. Let PTK get it right on my car and then there will be no doubts....cut outs are band aid fixes or for an all drag car....you don't see them on any LPE cars. Phil already posted a map that showed the TE44 out of the "sweet spot" he might be irritating to me these days..but I still place some value on what the ole fart has to say.

It would be better to go with Hi Flo or gutted cats than having to use electric cutouts to make boost. The PT52s made 2lbs of boost at 3000 rpms with a .58 AR....they are not that much different than TE44s...the rpms need to drop close to 700rpms to spool in the "sweet spot". The changes from TE63s to PT52s have only netted a 600rpm drop for max spool up...that is two ARs on the TE63s and 1 set of PT52 w/.58 AR. Just some advice from somebody that has been there before..your choice my friend.
Should I also wait? This is what I have LS2 stroked 402,LQ9 heads gutted cats, with cutouts 231/228 115 LSA 591/574.
What do you guys think? I'm new to this turbo stuff and kinda lost about the sweet spot and turbo sizes? Dalton sent me my turbos TE44's, I ordered the smaller one's (I think they were TE32's) for quicker spool time and the fact that they could support 980 HP which is way more than I will ever want or need, Dalton said they are having A hard time getting them or they can't get them? So now I'm wondering if TE44's are right for me?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #231  
VETZILLA's Avatar
VETZILLA
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 1
From: South Lyon MI
Default

Originally Posted by babala65
Should I also wait? This is what I have LS2 stroked 402,LQ9 heads gutted cats, with cutouts 231/228 115 LSA 591/574.
What do you guys think? I'm new to this turbo stuff and kinda lost about the sweet spot and turbo sizes? Dalton sent me my turbos TE44's, I ordered the smaller one's (I think they were TE32's) for quicker spool time and the fact that they could support 980 HP which is way more than I will ever want or need, Dalton said they are having A hard time getting them or they can't get them? So now I'm wondering if TE44's are right for me?
Even though I'm still holding a grudge you need to send them back and wait for Kevins results. In order to make your turbo selection the data he can provide will save you alot of time and effort.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #232  
babala65's Avatar
babala65
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 763
Likes: 1
From: Brownstown Michigan
Default

Forgive and forget!
Thanks Mike I think thats good advice what do you think Phil?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:30 PM
  #233  
NICK YOSKIN's Avatar
NICK YOSKIN
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,863
Likes: 86
From: PA
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

[QUOTE=babala65] 231/228 115 LSA 591/574.



you get that cam from tsp? i was thinking of running that cam but decided to go one notch down 228 224 58x 58x 115
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #234  
babala65's Avatar
babala65
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 763
Likes: 1
From: Brownstown Michigan
Default

Cam motion did A special grind that they highly reccomended with my set up.

How come you did not go with A reverse split?

Last edited by babala65; Mar 15, 2005 at 08:43 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #235  
RoadRebel's Avatar
RoadRebel
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 10
From: Macomb MI
Default

Originally Posted by babala65
Forgive and forget!
Thanks Mike I think thats good advice what do you think Phil?
um..346 cui is out of the sweetspot of the TE44 compressor, but not horribly.... but 402cui wont even be in the zipcode..
This of course is my humble opinion supported by limited data supplied by shinobi.

Phil
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #236  
NICK YOSKIN's Avatar
NICK YOSKIN
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,863
Likes: 86
From: PA
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by babala65
Cam motion did A special grind that they highly reccomended with my set up.

How come you did not go with A reverse split?

i did?

trevor at tsp told me that was his vendor suggested for his set up too. must use cam motion too. he wants to run hp's kit with big turbos with ls2 motor.

Last edited by NICK YOSKIN; Mar 15, 2005 at 09:24 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #237  
NICK YOSKIN's Avatar
NICK YOSKIN
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,863
Likes: 86
From: PA
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by RoadRebel
um..346 cui is out of the sweetspot of the TE44 compressor, but not horribly.... but 402cui wont even be in the zipcode..
This of course is my humble opinion supported by limited data supplied by shinobi.

Phil

sorry phil but a little confused with the above i was under the assumption that you thought te44 would be a little big for 346?
that would make a better fit for 402? pte doesnt make t4 gt30r.
te44 come in all different housings mine will be smallest with AR 58
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To PTK TT update

Old Mar 15, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #238  
RoadRebel's Avatar
RoadRebel
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 10
From: Macomb MI
Default

Originally Posted by NICK YOSKIN
sorry phil but a little confused with the above i was under the assumption that you thought te44 would be a little big for 346?
that would make a better fit for 402? pte doesnt make t4 gt30r.
te44 come in all different housings mine will be smallest with AR 58
No, the compressor flow profile on the TE-44 is not to "big". The flow profile just doesnt match the flow requirements spot on.
The more power you make at a given pressure ratio you will move to the RIGHT of the data points I did on the compressor map previously. The dark data point to the right of the sweet spot is based on shinobi's verbal data. The data point to the right of that is the same boost level but made more power, which used more airflow, pushes it further out of the sweet spot. Now, put 402cui and it moves the airflow even further away than that as it will require even more air at the same 9psi.
Now, the exhaust side of that turbo is a different story and Shinobi is finding out.

Phil


Phil

Last edited by RoadRebel; Mar 15, 2005 at 09:58 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 11:04 PM
  #239  
Bill Reid's Avatar
Bill Reid
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 3
From: Chandler AZ
Default

... but Mike felt the stock Ti exhaust was just too restrictive and was causing a flow issue. 608rwhp through cats @ 9psi right now.
I thought "we" had already proven the stock Ti system was pure junk on a turbo setup a year and a half ago. You are not paying for dyno time to prove this all over again are you?

Bill


Last edited by Bill Reid; Mar 15, 2005 at 11:07 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 11:07 PM
  #240  
Yano's Avatar
Yano
Drifting
Supporting Lifetime Gold
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs CO
Default

Originally Posted by babala65
Cam motion did A special grind that they highly reccomended with my set up.

How come you did not go with A reverse split?
That is where i got mine too
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM.

story-0
5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 most overrated Corvette track packages ever.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:46:45


VIEW MORE
story-1
Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

Slideshow: Every 2027 Corvette engine explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:16:31


VIEW MORE
story-2
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-08 19:53:43


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-8
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE