When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Absolutely lower it. When you do it all other Vettes will look like four wheel drives. You learn to watch the road more carefully, which is a good thing anyway.
This is my first C5, and I have had four prior vettes but don't know much about the C5. I am a do-it-myself kind of guy. I do not like to pay anyone to do something that I can do myself. When I do it, i know it's done right, pluse I love working on my cars myself. Given this, how do you lower the C5. I understand, there is no cost to lowering on it's stock bolts, other than an aligniment at a "GOOD SHOP". can someone giive me (lowering on stock bolts instructions). I just had new tires put on and a front end alignment. Do I HAVE to align the front end if I just lower it abou 3/4 inches? Thanks for everyones advise....
i seem to be in the minority here, but i hate mine is lowered... bumps suck... maybe because i'm use to plowing through anything in my liften suv, but the vette is a pain in the *** being lowered...
Also, May I suggest If you are going to lower the Vette, To upgrade to ZO6 sways and aluminum endlinks, or a Hotchkis set up, along with Bilstein Sports on all 4 corners (unless this upgrade has allready been done on your vehicle), It is more of a complete suspension package upgrade to add to the driving experience (Lowering,shocks,sways)
Yet chances are, you saw a lowered car long before you ever saw an asian car.
Go figure.
Yes, that's true, but typically only on the rods at car shows. Some of the cars/trucks that are in the weeds like that are cool to see, but are truly show pieces, and not practical on the streets. Today's import crowd likes to carry that concept onto their cars on the street, with the corresponding consequences when dealing with speed bumps, potholes, and curbs.
Rice? The performance argument could be made dude...
Yes, it could be. He didn't say what the intentions with his car are, but I'm guessing that it's not going to be a dedicated race car. Lowering a race car has definite advantages on a smooth track, but there are some disadvantages to having a lowered car on the street. My 1975 was slightly lower than stock, and while it didn't have trouble getting in/out of driveways, you sure as hell didn't want to straddle anything on the road bigger than a dead squirrel for fear of having it hit something on the bottom of the car. My 2002 is at stock ride height, and it's lower than my 1975 had been, and it lightly scrapes getting in/out of my driveway. Lowering it would really increase the risks of street driving.
Aesthetically, lowering a C5 typically throws off the whole look to me. I have seen some that looked righteous, but most of the lowered ones remind me of poorly done imports, in that the look of the car is now awkward.
Aesthetically, lowering a C5 typically throws off the whole look to me. I have seen some that looked righteous, but most of the lowered ones remind me of poorly done imports, in that the look of the car is now awkward.
You are more than entitled to your opinion on how it looks.
However, that isn't what I'm talking about. "Rice", "imports"?
You are more than entitled to your opinion on how it looks.
However, that isn't what I'm talking about. "Rice", "imports"?
What happened to auto enthusiasts on this board?
Actually, I've seen many imports that are very nicely done, both performance-wise, and looks-wise. I've also seen many that were not so nicely done, either in execution, taste, or both. These I call "rice". I've seen good and bad examples of domestic cars as well, though the bad domestics I usually just call "awful".
Most of the lowered cars that I've seen on the streets around here seem to be imports or trucks. Somehow, saying that a lowered Vette looks like a lowered truck didn't make sense, and so I compared it to a poorly done import, i.e. "rice".
I can't say that I find that terminology any more derogatory than referring to a C5 at stock height as a "4x4".