When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'll be trading my01 z51 a4 vert for a targa top 2004 m6. I have heard that manual puts down a little more to the wheel is that correct? How much more? The car I'm looking at has 19000 miles vs my vert z51 with 105000 miles. What difference in hp and torque due to low mileage vs high mileage? Also I heard that all FRC came with z51 but not all targa tops have it. Is there any difference in gear ratio/ acceleration between m6 and m6z51?
Thanks
From: "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19
NCM Sinkhole Donor
The LS1 after 2002 with the manual was rated at 350hp/375tq. The LS1 with the auto was rated at 350hp/350tq.
There is no difference in hp/tq ratings with the Z51 suspension package.
It's true the 1999/2000 FRC had Z51 as standard equipment, but that model became the Z06 in 2001 which had the FE4 suspension as standard.
Rear differential gear ratio was 3.42 for all manual transmission cars, including the Z06. The Z06 transmission known as the MN12 had more closely spaced 1st, 2nd and 3rd gear ratios as compared to the MN6 available in the coupe and the convertibles.
The 6 speed has LESS parasitic loss, so it will register higher #s on the dyno. It also comes with a 3.42 rear, verses a 2.73 or 3.15 in the auto. Both stock, the M6 is faster, but install the 3.42s and a TC in the auto, and the A4 will eat the M6's lunch
The Z51 was just an option, so it probably appears equally on the couple and frc, but not really sure. The suspension is stiffer on the Z51, so it may be a little faster accelerating, but once again, upgrades are available to make a Non Z51 just as quick.
The LS1 after 2002 with the manual was rated at 350hp/375tq. The LS1 with the auto was rated at 350hp/350tq.
There is no difference in hp/tq ratings with the Z51 suspension package.
It's true the 1999/2000 FRC had Z51 as standard equipment, but that model became the Z06 in 2001 which had the FE4 suspension as standard.
Rear differential gear ratio was 3.42 for all manual transmission cars, including the Z06. The Z06 transmission known as the MN12 had more closely spaced 1st, 2nd and 3rd gear ratios as compared to the MN6 available in the coupe and the convertibles.
Originally Posted by Blow Torch
The 6 speed has LESS parasitic loss, so it will register higher #s on the dyno. It also comes with a 3.42 rear, verses a 2.73 or 3.15 in the auto. Both stock, the M6 is faster, but install the 3.42s and a TC in the auto, and the A4 will eat the M6's lunch
The Z51 was just an option, so it probably appears equally on the couple and frc, but not really sure. The suspension is stiffer on the Z51, so it may be a little faster accelerating, but once again, upgrades are available to make a Non Z51 just as quick.
From: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '26
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
Typically the 6-speed car has about a 15% loss of HP between the crank and the rear end. The A4 loses about 18% or so. Plus the 6-speed has the 3.42 gearing compared to either the 2.73 (standard) or 3.15 (performance axle).
a4 easier on engine due to no over revving, with 3.42 gears it is a beast. never a missed shift and no expensive clutches and other parts to replace. the a4's are durable unless you are unleashing 500+ hp then you will have to upgrade some parts. I see most drivers lose drag races missing shifts.. bumping rev limiter etc... autos never make mistakes and usually win. fyi.
Though I prefer the manual shifting of my current C5 Z06, when I drag raced my previous C5 with A4, the repeatable consistency was unbeatable. The whole time I had the auto I wished I had a manual, except of course when stuck in typical NJ traffic.
You know that horse we always drag out for the "difference between..." threads? Here... Let me drag it out for ya'all to beat.
In the mean time... For those that talk about either transmission being faster than the other, the word "faster" is relative to the type of racing you're doing. Nobody will argue that the A4 is a better transmission for drag racing (especially bracket racing). And HOPEFULLY nobody will argue that the M6 is better for road racing and auto-x.
Answering the OP's question, the manual has less loss, and therefore will show more power to the ground on a dyno. But the difference in power is some-what negligible depending on your future mods and the purpose of your car. Some will tell you that the M6 is about 15% loss. To be honest, I believe it's closer to 13%. The A4s definitely have an 18-20% loss at the wheels.
It sounds to me that you're expecting a significant difference in the feel between the A4 and M6. I'll promise you now that there is a completely different feeling. However, if you're feeling more power, it's likely a placebo effect. The feeling of 10RWHP is hard to notice. But you'll definitely feel that you're in the power band better and the raw feeling of the manual is a lot more exciting (IMHO).
Just to clarify, the tranny in the Z06 is a wide-ratio unit in the 1st 4 gears, the std 6-speed is a closer-ratio unit. The Z06 has a 2.97 1st gear, which gives it more dig from a start, but the gaps between the gears are wider, up to the 1.0 4th gear.
You know that horse we always drag out for the "difference between..." threads? Here... Let me drag it out for ya'all to beat.
In the mean time... For those that talk about either transmission being faster than the other, the word "faster" is relative to the type of racing you're doing. Nobody will argue that the A4 is a better transmission for drag racing (especially bracket racing). And HOPEFULLY nobody will argue that the M6 is better for road racing and auto-x.
Answering the OP's question, the manual has less loss, and therefore will show more power to the ground on a dyno. But the difference in power is some-what negligible depending on your future mods and the purpose of your car. Some will tell you that the M6 is about 15% loss. To be honest, I believe it's closer to 13%. The A4s definitely have an 18-20% loss at the wheels.
It sounds to me that you're expecting a significant difference in the feel between the A4 and M6. I'll promise you now that there is a completely different feeling. However, if you're feeling more power, it's likely a placebo effect. The feeling of 10RWHP is hard to notice. But you'll definitely feel that you're in the power band better and the raw feeling of the manual is a lot more exciting (IMHO).
Well said.
A few more things on the manual though, it will feel much faster because of the gear ratio and you are locked to the motor by the clutch whereas with an auto it is almost continuously slipping compared to the motor. So with the manual you will feel the power in every gear because there is no lag from the time the motor revs up to the time you start to accelerate. I think that the auto feels kind of lazy when just driving it normally where that manual feels more like a sports car with its raw power.
Just to clarify, the tranny in the Z06 is a wide-ratio unit in the 1st 4 gears, the std 6-speed is a closer-ratio unit. The Z06 has a 2.97 1st gear, which gives it more dig from a start, but the gaps between the gears are wider, up to the 1.0 4th gear.
DG
Wow. Just sat down and did the numbers and your right. So while being better for acceleration in every gear(long as you have the rpms to support it) why is it it is always declared a close ratio version? I'm pretty sure I've even seen GM material that calls It that.
Not many of us are full time racers. I bought a Covette for the fun factor. It is my first Covette (not new) and my first manual trans in 40 years. It is fun and makes me feel young again. I vote Manual 6 Speed.
Just to clarify, the tranny in the Z06 is a wide-ratio unit in the 1st 4 gears, the std 6-speed is a closer-ratio unit. The Z06 has a 2.97 1st gear, which gives it more dig from a start, but the gaps between the gears are wider, up to the 1.0 4th gear.
DG
Are you sure? I will have to check my books at home, but I thought the MN12 was the closer ratio tranny. And I thought it was the lower final drive ratio that is said to account for the lower top speed as compared to the MN6 equiped cars.
Can anyone post the ratios for both tranny's and your source of info? Thanks
Funny how some compare the a4 with the m6 but then say how the a4 with 3.42 gears and a shift tune will smoke the m6. Well if we are going to mod then the m6 with twin clutch and 4.10 gears and short throw shifter will smoke the a4.....and on it goes.
It really boils down to a personal thing. There is always a faster car but shifting puts "you" more into the driving experience. I like my m6 and if I want to not think about driving I drive the suburban. either way c5s are fun......but more so with the m6.
Are you sure? I will have to check my books at home, but I thought the MN12 was the closer ratio tranny. And I thought it was the lower final drive ratio that is said to account for the lower top speed as compared to the MN6 equiped cars.
Can anyone post the ratios for both tranny's and your source of info? Thanks
The MN12 is not closer ratio. HOWEVER, the first gear is shorter due to it's high ratio and therefore will allow the car to reach red-line sooner. But the ratios are spread further apart and that makes it a wider ratio. The reason it was done like this is because the LS6 spins to a higher top RPM and has the power to make better use of the power band. After 4th gear, the ratios are actually shorter than the MN6 giving the MN6 longer legs.
Are you sure? I will have to check my books at home, but I thought the MN12 was the closer ratio tranny. And I thought it was the lower final drive ratio that is said to account for the lower top speed as compared to the MN6 equiped cars.
Can anyone post the ratios for both tranny's and your source of info? Thanks
all MN6 cars (the RPO for manual transmission) used the 3.42 rear end regardless of whether it had the MM6 or M12 gear sets, so to make an applicable comparison, let's take a 2000 FRC & an 01 Z06 to redline in 5th gear. running the numbers in a perfect world, this is what you'll get:
FRC (MM6) - 188mph
Z06 (M12) - 176mph
even though the Z06 is going another 500rpm, the shorter gear (.84 vs .74) & the 1/2" shorter tire don't make up for it. what they do help is getting to that speed quicker.
all MN6 cars (the RPO for manual transmission) used the 3.42 rear end regardless of whether it had the MM6 or M12 gear sets, so to make an applicable comparison, let's take a 2000 FRC & an 01 Z06 to redline in 5th gear. running the numbers in a perfect world, this is what you'll get:
FRC (MM6) - 188mph
Z06 (M12) - 176mph
even though the Z06 is going another 500rpm, the shorter gear (.84 vs .74) & the 1/2" shorter tire don't make up for it. what they do help is getting to that speed quicker.
Wind resistance is a biotch ain't it
I was just trying to find some numbers and came up with these:
The Z06's top speed is 171mph and the LS1's were 175mph. But I'm sure there are difference's between testing.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.