Shell 89 octane
Just stop idling at a drive through for a coffee or a burger instead.:-)
wating to happen.This topic is “debated” often and always ends the same way.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-g...st-report.html

(I used to live in Rockland Co. back when it was almost rural.)






Yesterday - we had occasion to dyno tune an '08 C6 (LS3) with an Edelbrock supercharger that had been installed and tuned in Indiana. The car was tuned for 93 octane....we have only 91 octane here in Arizona.
The car detonated with anything more than about 8-9 degrees of timing. We tried everything to figure out why. We pulled out a boroscope and took a look at the tops of the pistons. They were all cratered and looked very similar to the surface of the moon. The owner admitted that he had been running 87 octane from time to time. Also the installing shop had de-sensitized the knock sensors to the point of them not working at all.
This car should have been able to run 12-14 degrees of advance with no issue, and would not without a lot of detonation. Bottom line is we de-tuned the car, the owner is going to try a couple of cans of Sea-Foam to break up the carbon on top of the pistons. We'll re-check the car after he does the Sea-Foam, and runs a couple of tankfuls of 91 Chevron through it. I have my doubts, it looked like damage to me.....

So to answer the question - can the car run lower than recommended octane? Yes - if the timing is retarded. The knock sensors should be able to handle it - but the long term affect is not desireable. You will get less performance due to the retarded timing, and less fuel mileage as well. All in the interest of saving about twenty cents per gallon times maybe 15 gallons. That's three dollars for a 15 gallon tank. To me - not worth it.
I try to run the fuel that is recommended, and that is at least 91 octane. Your car - your choice.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts








Yesterday - we had occasion to dyno tune an '08 C6 (LS3) with an Edelbrock supercharger that had been installed and tuned in Indiana. The car was tuned for 93 octane....we have only 91 octane here in Arizona.
The car detonated with anything more than about 8-9 degrees of timing. We tried everything to figure out why. We pulled out a boroscope and took a look at the tops of the pistons. They were all cratered and looked very similar to the surface of the moon. The owner admitted that he had been running 87 octane from time to time. Also the installing shop had de-sensitized the knock sensors to the point of them not working at all.
This car should have been able to run 12-14 degrees of advance with no issue, and would not without a lot of detonation. Bottom line is we de-tuned the car, the owner is going to try a couple of cans of Sea-Foam to break up the carbon on top of the pistons. We'll re-check the car after he does the Sea-Foam, and runs a couple of tankfuls of 91 Chevron through it. I have my doubts, it looked like damage to me.....

So to answer the question - can the car run lower than recommended octane? Yes - if the timing is retarded. The knock sensors should be able to handle it - but the long term affect is not desireable. You will get less performance due to the retarded timing, and less fuel mileage as well. All in the interest of saving about twenty cents per gallon times maybe 15 gallons. That's three dollars for a 15 gallon tank. To me - not worth it.
I try to run the fuel that is recommended, and that is at least 91 octane. Your car - your choice.






Yesterday - we had occasion to dyno tune an '08 C6 (LS3) with an Edelbrock supercharger that had been installed and tuned in Indiana. The car was tuned for 93 octane....we have only 91 octane here in Arizona.
The car detonated with anything more than about 8-9 degrees of timing. We tried everything to figure out why. We pulled out a boroscope and took a look at the tops of the pistons. They were all cratered and looked very similar to the surface of the moon. The owner admitted that he had been running 87 octane from time to time. Also the installing shop had de-sensitized the knock sensors to the point of them not working at all.
This car should have been able to run 12-14 degrees of advance with no issue, and would not without a lot of detonation. Bottom line is we de-tuned the car, the owner is going to try a couple of cans of Sea-Foam to break up the carbon on top of the pistons. We'll re-check the car after he does the Sea-Foam, and runs a couple of tankfuls of 91 Chevron through it. I have my doubts, it looked like damage to me.....

So to answer the question - can the car run lower than recommended octane? Yes - if the timing is retarded. The knock sensors should be able to handle it - but the long term affect is not desireable. You will get less performance due to the retarded timing, and less fuel mileage as well. All in the interest of saving about twenty cents per gallon times maybe 15 gallons. That's three dollars for a 15 gallon tank. To me - not worth it.
I try to run the fuel that is recommended, and that is at least 91 octane. Your car - your choice.
I got a ride up to the dealership and drove it home. two days later it was quite chilly over night. Went out the next morning and the car would not start again, I tried again but it just wasn't going to start. Once again AA towed in on a flatbed back to the Chevy dealership and they let it sit over night but it started OK. Once again it ran fine. but they kept it for a few days and on the last day of the week it was down right cold. The Corvette technician came out at 8:30 and tried to start it and sure enough it wouldn't start. They tried all sorts of thing and called me to come get it. I did and drove it home and sure as S*&^T it would not start in the morning. Yes it went back to the dealership where the shop foreman and the senior Corvette technician after the other techs went home pulled in in and just went through the software and no codes were set so they just did old fashion and started with Compression/fuel/ and spark.
The car had excellent compression, it had perfect spark and it had perfect fuel pressure. They rechecked everything right to the cylinder. The only thing that was off in any way was the fuel. For some reason the fuel wasn't getting to the intake valve. but upon closer inspection the cause was clear. On page 338 of the Owners Manual it states the engine, being supercharged needed 91 octane minimum and cannot be run on any fuel containing anymore than 10% of ethanol.
The problem was that the previous owners had never bother to read the owners manual ( They leased it so who cares) but they fed it a diet of 87 octane for those leased years and by using cheap, crud fueled gasoline, it had built up deposits on the inside of the intake valves that in the start cycle the fuel mixture which was fine, but it could not move fast enough to get past the huge build up of carbon and general low cheap fuel in a enough quantity that by the time the valve closed it had enough gasoline to ignite to have combustion. They used a GM product twice to break up the crap that coated the intake valves. I suppose it is akin to sea-foam and it was sucked in by the brake booster hose, once done twice they shut it off and put everything back together and backed it outside and ran it for an hour as it was smoking like all hell. Once they brought it back in they changed the oil and filter.
They called to come get it. Once there the foreman told me the trouble and said to run it on 91 octane, I said I have read the owners manual and I only have run 93 octane in it and he said along with the 93 octane to buy a five or six big bottles of Chevron/Techron and for the next six month to run a bottle thorough it with every other tankful, which I have. But that is the effect of 87 octane being run in an engine designed for 91 octane fuel. So if you own a Corvette and resent having to put high octane fuel instead of cheap regular. . . do everyone a favor, go trade in the Corvette for a Cobalt or a Chevy Sonic or whatever. If your going to own it, then you need to take care of it.
Your alternative is to make it a garage queen. W/o the proper additives you will pay more in repairs down the road.
JMOP
Last edited by doubleD; Mar 24, 2012 at 10:22 PM.



Now if you have a newer C6 the standard model is built for use with regular. That might give some of you a reason to upgrade. However, the cost of the car outweight the gas prices savings of course. ;-)
I run Chevron 90% of the time .... and if I get cheap I run top tier gas and I use Techiron additive every other tankful. It works out to about the same per gallon. However, sometimes it's just more convenient when I'm traveling etc...
Wish I could get 93 here in Cali.
Last edited by Mecinoid; Mar 24, 2012 at 11:21 PM.



















+ Texaco w/Techron
