When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You said a 10 WHP / 10 WTQ difference. That is total BS. They produce close to the same on a practically stock LS6.
Not gonna argue any more as people will buy and run whatever "they believe" is better. If you believe a larger header on a pretty much stock bolt on c5 is better then the appropriate 1 3/4 header that's your business.
I would hardly site ONE website comparing headers as the gospel. There are a TON of threads on this. Some companies have tested both back to back and made more power with the 1 7/8's, others not.
They make so similar hp numbers it's ridiculous. Google "dyno numbers c5 Z06" and you will find threads of people posting their numbers.
As I did early, people had almost identical results with similar mods but different size headers than I did. Certainly, not 10 hp+ differences.
The way I understood it when I was shopping around prior to install was 1 3/4 was better for mid-range and around town torque. 1 7/8 would be better for peak hp and high rpm applications such as Road Courses. I went with the 1 7/8 since mine spends most of the time in upper range.
For street driving I would have went with the 1 3/4.
Either way, the difference is negligible between the two until you start making serious power.
Last edited by JeremyGSU; Apr 1, 2014 at 03:03 PM.
I would hardly site ONE website comparing headers as the gospel. There are a TON of threads on this. Some companies have tested both back to back and made more power with the 1 7/8's, others not.
They make so similar hp numbers it's ridiculous. Google "dyno numbers c5 Z06" and you will find threads of people posting their numbers.
As I did early, people had almost identical results with similar mods but different size headers than I did. Certainly, not 10 hp+ differences.
The way I understood it when I was shopping around prior to install was 1 3/4 was better for mid-range and around town torque. 1 7/8 would be better for peak hp and high rpm applications such as Road Courses. I went with the 1 7/8 since mine spends most of the time in upper range.
For street driving I would have went with the 1 3/4.
Either way, the difference is negligible between the two until you start making serious power.
My 1 7/8 ARH gave the most sotp increase from 4500-5000 & up to my redline of 6800 Perfect for my 3.90 Z! Much easier to control wheelspin. Power doesn`t drop off at all before 6800.
My car only made 360rwhp with 1 3/4, no cats, borla exhaust and a tune. I dyno'd with the zip tie mod, but I'm still pretty disappointed with the results. It drives great and all, but definitely not worth the money and time I have invested in it. The car made buckets of torque (385 to the rear wheels). I've seen stock cars produce better number than mine..
My car only made 360rwhp with 1 3/4, no cats, borla exhaust and a tune. I dyno'd with the zip tie mod, but I'm still pretty disappointed with the results. It drives great and all, but definitely not worth the money and time I have invested in it. The car made buckets of torque (385 to the rear wheels). I've seen stock cars produce better number than mine..
I went with a very reputable GM tuner.. I was very surprised to see the numbers.
I agree, the numbers don't make sense at all. Typically, an LS6 with those mods should make more HP than TQ if tuned correctly (and the HP to TQ ratio doesn't really have anything to do with the type of dyno, unless there is some issue with the dyno).
My car only made 360rwhp with 1 3/4, no cats, borla exhaust and a tune. I dyno'd with the zip tie mod, but I'm still pretty disappointed with the results. It drives great and all, but definitely not worth the money and time I have invested in it. The car made buckets of torque (385 to the rear wheels). I've seen stock cars produce better number than mine..
My 03 made 365hp/358hp w/ just a vararam & tune on a VERY stingy mustang dyno, and I agree that especially w/ headers you should be making more HP than torque anyhow, there's something wrong w/ the tune or the dyno or both....but I'd guess more to do w/ the tune because the torque # is still strong.
From: Wylie TX --> Less is More, except under the hood !
Originally Posted by VPP
Just dynoed my '04 Z06 only 2 weeks ago with 1-3/4" Long-Tubes, Catted X-Pipe, Vararam, Borla Axle-Back + Tune...
Put down 391/379 which I've been told is about standard for our cars. Getting to 400 with these mods is VERY rare.
VPP
Yea 400rwhp with bolt on's is rare (CAI, Headers, exhaust, tune).
Most I have seen are around 390rwhp 380rwtq.
Originally Posted by 04silverZ06
So your saying the larger tubing is actually robbing power with the standard 'hardware'?
LG's ran back to back testing with the 1 3/4 headers, and 1 7/8 headers on a LS6 Z06. Anthony told me they lost a little with the 1 7/8 because they are just a little big for the 346ci. Now if you have a stroker 383ci a 1 7/8 would be beneficial.
The tuner just told me that the reason for my numbers was that the headers I used (xs power) bottle necked at the collector.
OK but think about it - no cats and headers and you're putting down worse numbers than WITH cats and cast irony manifolds? Makes no sense with or without a bottleneck.