It's coming - Mid-engine Corvette (Merged)





http://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/...age=AAmqf52|29
Last edited by mrlmd; Jan 30, 2017 at 04:44 PM.

But who knows, I saw the Euro look being slowly introduced into the American heritage of what was once an American Icon, looks like they want to turn it into a multi national icon. IM happy I left GM when I did.
I never worked a day in my life while there.
Bill aka ET





https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-together.html
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I do like the idea of two, one super car not limited by price to compete apples for apples on the world stage and one "affordable" car with higher levels of the latter in between to keep all the super cars on there toes.
I really don't think it would kill the Vette to do it like this. The super car is not going to hurt the regular Vette as I think it is obviously a different market for the most part. It may prove to give the whole line a boost if it is a world beater.
And would that not be cool
Last edited by Forcedvert; Jan 30, 2017 at 07:36 PM.
See, it already doesn't make any sense...
See, it already doesn't make any sense...

But who knows there was a Vette killing Buick in the 80's

See, it already doesn't make any sense...

Selling mags or advertising on there web sight is for sure true.
$300k to $400k would sure take any handcuffs off to let them be a world class competitor, just look at what they can do with 1/3 of it. Not too shabby.

Selling mags or advertising on there web sight is for sure true.
$300k to $400k would sure take any handcuffs off to let them be a world class competitor, just look at what they can do with 1/3 of it. Not too shabby.
Problem is, I know how GM works from the inside. The first thing they do ( did ) was to determine the demographic. the target market. they want the Corvette to be the flagship for the middle class who could aspire to own a corvette. There was never any drive to attain or go after the super rich or super cars. GM has the resources to make a 200,000 car. Ford has the F1 and its not a money maker. its the common man's exotic,, it does not really appeal to the supper rich.
The evolution of super cars comes from a lineage of super cars. Ferrari does not have a Malibu or a Cruise in their stable.
Unless there has been a dramatic shift in the mission statement and focus at GM and Corvette, I can't see them pushing the 200K market. They might be testing the waters with the 120K C7 full package Carbon Z. I cant see them jumping into a dramatic shift to a mid engine. Its Not GM and its Not Corvette. And Corvette, Like the FI is not a desirable car for the super rich.. You won't see any Corvettes in Dubai. It would be an embarrassment to the Son of a billionaire. BY and large Corvettes are 60K, sure you can spend more, but its a 60K car at entry.. Once the Corvette stable is at 100K entry to 150K, a mid engine might be in the evolution. I just don't think we are there yet. and to my knowledge no one at Corvette is supporting the notion of going away from push rods.
Push rods are reliable.. you will never get a DOHC V8 to be certified for 200,000 miles. DOHC cars run at twice the RPMs and are worn out at half the time. I don't think GM will give up engine reliability to appeal to a market that they have never wanted to be involved with
Last edited by Evil-Twin; Jan 30, 2017 at 10:18 PM.
Problem is, I know how GM works from the inside. The first thing they do ( did ) was to determine the demographic. the target market. they want the Corvette to be the flagship for the middle class who could aspire to own a corvette. There was never any drive to attain or go after the super rich or super cars. GM has the resources to make a 200,000 car. Ford has the F1 and its not a money maker. its the common man's exotic,, it does not really appeal to the supper rich.
The evolution of super cars comes from a lineage of super cars. Ferrari does not have a Malibu or a Cruise in their stable.
Unless there has been a dramatic shift in the mission statement and focus at GM and Corvette, I can't see them pushing the 200K market. They might be testing the waters with the 120K C7 full package Carbon Z. I cant see them jumping into a dramatic shift to a mid engine. Its Not GM and its Not Corvette. And Corvette, Like the FI is not a desirable car for the super rich.. You won't see any Corvettes in Dubai. It would be an embarrassment to the Son of a billionaire. BY and large Corvettes are 60K, sure you can spend more, but its a 60K car at entry.. Once the Corvette stable is at 100K entry to 150K, a mid engine might be in the evolution. I just don't think we are there yet. and to my knowledge no one at Corvette is supporting the notion of going away from push rods.
Push rods are reliable.. you will never get a DOHC V8 to be certified for 200,000 miles. DOHC cars run at twice the RPMs and are worn out at half the time. I don't think GM will give up engine reliability to appeal to a market that they have never wanted to be involved with
Problem is, I know how GM works from the inside. The first thing they do ( did ) was to determine the demographic. the target market. they want the Corvette to be the flagship for the middle class who could aspire to own a corvette. There was never any drive to attain or go after the super rich or super cars. GM has the resources to make a 200,000 car. Ford has the F1 and its not a money maker. its the common man's exotic,, it does not really appeal to the supper rich.
The evolution of super cars comes from a lineage of super cars. Ferrari does not have a Malibu or a Cruise in their stable.
Unless there has been a dramatic shift in the mission statement and focus at GM and Corvette, I can't see them pushing the 200K market. They might be testing the waters with the 120K C7 full package Carbon Z. I cant see them jumping into a dramatic shift to a mid engine. Its Not GM and its Not Corvette. And Corvette, Like the FI is not a desirable car for the super rich.. You won't see any Corvettes in Dubai. It would be an embarrassment to the Son of a billionaire. BY and large Corvettes are 60K, sure you can spend more, but its a 60K car at entry.. Once the Corvette stable is at 100K entry to 150K, a mid engine might be in the evolution. I just don't think we are there yet. and to my knowledge no one at Corvette is supporting the notion of going away from push rods.
Push rods are reliable.. you will never get a DOHC V8 to be certified for 200,000 miles. DOHC cars run at twice the RPMs and are worn out at half the time. I don't think GM will give up engine reliability to appeal to a market that they have never wanted to be involved with
I think GM is going to go the mid engine route to have a car that can compete better in their racing programs. Porsche has been moving the engine in board more and more to make it a mid engine car (almost), Ford has the GT, Ferrari, Audi R10, the list goes on. The C7 has been a competitive package but I think it is nearing its limits. They had a hard time being in 4th at Daytona and couldn't qualify anywhere near the top.
I am not sure I would worry about DOHC and reliability. Other manufacturers have been making reliable DOHC engines for some time now. My SOHC Datsun motor is still running strong from 1973.
Engine platforms are changing. We are seeing smaller and smaller motors from all the manufacturers, with many of them using turbo chargers. Engine are being expected to be more efficient while producing less pollutants. I really think GM will be making these changes shortly.
Maybe I don't know what I am talking about. Wouldn't be the first time and I sure it won't be the last. But with the pictures above and information we have I would say we are closer to a GM mid engined car than we ever have.













say it ain't so, we're getting further and further away from our roots. One day we will wake up to the announcement GM will no longer produce a Corvette...



