When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I’ll get used to the power might take awhile I usually put about 1000 miles per year on it but man the sound with the blower and cam damn that car sounds amazing
Absolutely! You'll likely get used to it quicker than you think.
It took me longer to get used to going from stock to H/C (120 rwhp/50rwtq gain) than it did to go from H/C to FI (another 216rwhp/178rwtq gain). I wanted another 100 rwhp minimum within the first 2 months post FI.
If I drove my C5 more I likely would have done it already.
The real trick with power is once you get used to it, going backwards is a breeze. But you also will never be impressed with stock again.
I took the 10psi kit off the coupe two or three years ago and immediately dropped from 500rw to 340rw and I cannot tell you how much fun that car became because it turned that NA driving experience into 'driving a slow car fast' and man can these cars shine when they have even slight suspension upgrades. It can still drive better than I can, but my sense of confidence in the chassis and power level went through the roof.
The real trick with power is once you get used to it, going backwards is a breeze. But you also will never be impressed with stock again.
I took the 10psi kit off the coupe two or three years ago and immediately dropped from 500rw to 340rw and I cannot tell you how much fun that car became because it turned that NA driving experience into 'driving a slow car fast' and man can these cars shine when they have even slight suspension upgrades. It can still drive better than I can, but my sense of confidence in the chassis and power level went through the roof.
I can see where you're coming from, but I'm never going back.
I had a brief dream of owning two supercharged C5s. And for a few days it was a reality. But once I began rebuilding the newer one I sold the AA procharger kit to fund the shortblock.
The real trick with power is once you get used to it, going backwards is a breeze. But you also will never be impressed with stock again.
I took the 10psi kit off the coupe two or three years ago and immediately dropped from 500rw to 340rw and I cannot tell you how much fun that car became because it turned that NA driving experience into 'driving a slow car fast' and man can these cars shine when they have even slight suspension upgrades. It can still drive better than I can, but my sense of confidence in the chassis and power level went through the roof.
when I take mine off will be when the motor comes out to get forged and stroked plus I want better heads ,tranny,clutch ,ecs brace. I need another job or two so I can fund this lol
Absolutely! You'll likely get used to it quicker than you think.
It took me longer to get used to going from stock to H/C (120 rwhp/50rwtq gain) than it did to go from H/C to FI (another 216rwhp/178rwtq gain). I wanted another 100 rwhp minimum within the first 2 months post FI.
If I drove my C5 more I likely would have done it already.
First World problems
I think I get more excited about throwing new parts on more than driving it maybe I’m just getting old (45)
I think I get more excited about throwing new parts on more than driving it maybe I’m just getting old (45)
I was pondering this recently. I greatly enjoy tinkering. I alter most tools and equipment I own. Computers, cars, radios, firearms, home electronics, you name it. And while I do enjoy all the nit picky slow work I do on the Z06 I am pushing myself to sit out there each night and 'let the cold in' a little bit as it has still been in the 20s here at night. But fun as it is to tinker, the balance of the work has been done to the car such that if I can get over the hump with the annoying custom wiring then really the rest is basic wrenching and assembly. I'd like to get this thing fired up and go from a build to a driving car and enjoy it some while finishing the rest of the details off between drives.
I was pondering this recently. I greatly enjoy tinkering. I alter most tools and equipment I own. Computers, cars, radios, firearms, home electronics, you name it. And while I do enjoy all the nit picky slow work I do on the Z06 I am pushing myself to sit out there each night and 'let the cold in' a little bit as it has still been in the 20s here at night. But fun as it is to tinker, the balance of the work has been done to the car such that if I can get over the hump with the annoying custom wiring then really the rest is basic wrenching and assembly. I'd like to get this thing fired up and go from a build to a driving car and enjoy it some while finishing the rest of the details off between drives.
20’s I hate cold weather , I can’t motivated to do anything when it’s that cold
The real trick with power is once you get used to it, going backwards is a breeze. But you also will never be impressed with stock again.
I took the 10psi kit off the coupe two or three years ago and immediately dropped from 500rw to 340rw and I cannot tell you how much fun that car became because it turned that NA driving experience into 'driving a slow car fast' and man can these cars shine when they have even slight suspension upgrades. It can still drive better than I can, but my sense of confidence in the chassis and power level went through the roof.
100% I've always said the same. It's more fun to have a slower car that you can drive fast vs. a fast car you have to drive slow. However, I drove my brothers mostly stock FRC about two years ago (it had been many years since I drove a stock C5) and I was quickly brought back to the days and times I realized these cars are fun but not fast from the factory.
That's also why I'm all for DR's on a car that makes big power. Sure you can keep your car controlled with either tire but you have a lot more throttle opportunity to be aggressive with a tire that sticks. So my vote is for a fast car I can drive fast.
I think I get more excited about throwing new parts on more than driving it maybe I’m just getting old (45)
I hear you! I'm about to turn the ripe old age of 48 a month from today. I always go through phases. I typically like driving more than tinkering. But then I outsourced my last engine build and since I've had a lot less to tinker on with on this car. Which has me getting creative and trying new parts just so I can get my hands dirty.
I still have a few other vehicles to play around with but they aren't nearly as satisfying to modify as a C5.
100% I've always said the same. It's more fun to have a slower car that you can drive fast vs. a fast car you have to drive slow. However, I drove my brothers mostly stock FRC about two years ago (it had been many years since I drove a stock C5) and I was quickly brought back to the days and times I realized these cars are fun but not fast from the factory.
That's also why I'm all for DR's on a car that makes big power. Sure you can keep your car controlled with either tire but you have a lot more throttle opportunity to be aggressive with a tire that sticks. So my vote is for a fast car I can drive fast.
Hands down right on sticky tires. Sticky tires start a domino effect. When they hook, the car experiences weight transfer, putting more pressure on the tires, making them stick even better, which adds more transfer. Sure there's a limit, but you gotta have sticky tires. One thing I never really thought about on drag racing, until a guy at work pointed it out, and that's height. I asked him why? He said imagine a 300lb driver in a car with no roof, with the seat 5 ft above the normal height. When you leave, the car will want to run out under you, which transfers all that weight to the tires, like the driver is a breaker bar trying to pull back on the car. So now when I'm at the track, I lift both power seats as high as they go. It's not a 5 ft high seat, and I'm not a 300 pounder, but you get the idea. Hey, the guy has a '64 Nova with a 572 BBC that runs 8s, so.....Sorry, another hijack!! Dammit
Your comments prompted me to look at the RT615K+ which I had not seen before. They don't currently have anything in 19" for my CCWs sadly.
i got them for their 18" options (and of course, road course performance)
Originally Posted by Che vette
I hear ya I usually don’t beat on the car but that was the first time out on the new set up just wanted to see what it’d do
figured as much... sorry that i've got a little PTSD from a decade of people trying to tell me & others that PD blowers are uncontrollable & only good for burnouts because they make off-idle torque.
Originally Posted by Burnt C6
I just ordered a set of those off Tire Rack Tuesday but in stock size front and 295/40/18 rears.
...
i think the 295/40-18 should've been the stock size. fits so good - especially with a 275/35-18 front.
Originally Posted by MWWarlord
I can see where you're coming from, but I'm never going back.
thought so, too - but pulleying up to 4psi (from 13) made mine a lot more manageable for horsing around... and i almost liked it
Originally Posted by Che vette
20’s I hate cold weather , I can’t motivated to do anything when it’s that cold
shoot - i just changed the clutch in my wife's hummer last week when it was 10°.
it did suck *****, though.
Originally Posted by grinder11
Hands down right on sticky tires. Sticky tires start a domino effect. When they hook, the car experiences weight transfer, putting more pressure on the tires, making them stick even better, which adds more transfer. Sure there's a limit, but you gotta have sticky tires. One thing I never really thought about on drag racing, until a guy at work pointed it out, and that's height. I asked him why? He said imagine a 300lb driver in a car with no roof, with the seat 5 ft above the normal height. When you leave, the car will want to run out under you, which transfers all that weight to the tires, like the driver is a breaker bar trying to pull back on the car. So now when I'm at the track, I lift both power seats as high as they go. It's not a 5 ft high seat, and I'm not a 300 pounder, but you get the idea. Hey, the guy has a '64 Nova with a 572 BBC that runs 8s, so.....Sorry, another hijack!! Dammit
hmm... interesting observation. i'll have to remember that!
shoot - i just changed the clutch in my wife's hummer last week when it was 10°. it did suck *****, though.
bet it did suck but the wife’s always come first whatever they want/need
Hands down right on sticky tires. Sticky tires start a domino effect. When they hook, the car experiences weight transfer, putting more pressure on the tires, making them stick even better, which adds more transfer. Sure there's a limit, but you gotta have sticky tires. One thing I never really thought about on drag racing, until a guy at work pointed it out, and that's height. I asked him why? He said imagine a 300lb driver in a car with no roof, with the seat 5 ft above the normal height. When you leave, the car will want to run out under you, which transfers all that weight to the tires, like the driver is a breaker bar trying to pull back on the car. So now when I'm at the track, I lift both power seats as high as they go. It's not a 5 ft high seat, and I'm not a 300 pounder, but you get the idea. Hey, the guy has a '64 Nova with a 572 BBC that runs 8s, so.....Sorry, another hijack!! Dammit
Exactly why removing the front sway bar is popular at the 1/4 mile track. The sway bar inhibits front end rise. Removing it allows more weight transfer to the rear tires. No brainer.
It's the same concept in modified tractor pulling competitions. Lighten the front end, add weight to the back with grippy tires, raise your seat position and arch backwards at "go" to transfer your weight to the tires. My nephews have been destroying the 16 and under class in the Tri-state since they were 7 and 9.
I'm 6'3 without a helmet on. When I go to the track my *** is as far down to the floor as possible. Otherwise I'm not fitting in my car. So seat goes down, sway bar comes off and stickies stay out back.
I had a brief dream of owning two supercharged C5s. And for a few days it was a reality. But once I began rebuilding the newer one I sold the AA procharger kit to fund the shortblock.
I too have a dream of owning two supercharged C5s but I just can't justify the cost. So I use the one supercharged C5 as my daily in the warmer months and the other C5 as a show car.
Originally Posted by _zebra
honestly, it sounds like you just need to get more familiar with the 98 throttle percentages between 1% & 100%. i'm laying down ~650tq from a PD blower on street tires & can reliably control it through all gears (though i've gotten sideways from smashing it in any of the first 4 gears). not ******* on you - just saying having a ton of power can still be controllable.
but as for tires, i've enjoyed the Falken RT615K+ set i'm running now. Nitto Invo was alright but let loose pretty easy when you got on it... planned on doing the 140TW NT05s but they kept sending 3-4yr old tires. that's when i went with the Falkens.
I just replaced my Nitto Invo tires as I thought they totally sucked. Even with a whopping tire size, 345/30/19, and stock engine horsepower, I got little traction. Replaced the Nitto tires with Michelin tires (which were big $) but have yet to use them as winter hasn't left us alone in Iowa yet.
bet it did suck but the wife’s always come first whatever they want/need
that & i needed my truck back - she'd been driving it to work while i was deployed.
Originally Posted by knewblewkorvette
... I just replaced my Nitto Invo tires as I thought they totally sucked. Even with a whopping tire size, 345/30/19, and stock engine horsepower, I got little traction. Replaced the Nitto tires with Michelin tires (which were big $) but have yet to use them as winter hasn't left us alone in Iowa yet.
i thought they were a big step up from the BFG runflats that were on it at purchase. i did a few track days on the invos (with plenty of mountain roads in between) and mostly highway miles on them but didn't really push it competitively hard through turns because they're cruising tires. they were quiet & comfortable for regular driving, and i felt fine setting the cruise at 80 in light rain (on nice FL roads at the time). that's what i meant by my comments - would i buy them for hooking gobs of torque or trying to shave lap times? heck no!
outside of drag radials or R-comps, i was down to my falkens or the 140 NT05s (at least without changing wheels) to get a better set of non-runflats.
Exactly why removing the front sway bar is popular at the 1/4 mile track. The sway bar inhibits front end rise. Removing it allows more weight transfer to the rear tires. No brainer.
It's the same concept in modified tractor pulling competitions. Lighten the front end, add weight to the back with grippy tires, raise your seat position and arch backwards at "go" to transfer your weight to the tires. My nephews have been destroying the 16 and under class in the Tri-state since they were 7 and 9.
I'm 6'3 without a helmet on. When I go to the track my *** is as far down to the floor as possible. Otherwise I'm not fitting in my car. So seat goes down, sway bar comes off and stickies stay out back.
Right on, Johnny, on the sway bar. Mines been off since 2009! I don't miss it a bit. The car is so low, and still has the rear sway bar, that unless you're roadracing, it's debatable if it's essential, or not. NOTE!! Even with the front bar off, I've been on the Dragon many times, and driven it fast enough thru the twisties that my wife vomited on our last trip!! So now I've had to agree to slow down. I was surprised at the difference in weight transfer w/o the bar...