Disable Traction Control?
So, some things I'd log with the scan tool... engine speed, spark, injector pulse width, both rear wheel speeds (I don't remember if there are accessible to the PCM), brake switch (% pressure would be better if there's a PID for that), traction control (indicates enabled or disabled), requested torque (EBTCM->PCM) and delivered torque (PCM->EBTCM). Might also include the APP % (requested) and TPS % (actual). I'm wondering if you're WSS signals are in fact close to one another as you roll into the throttle and how it's influenced by brake pressure. The independent variables you can vary are the amount of brake pressure, rate of roll on, and initial engine speed.
Thought question... What's the experience of folks with a line lock? Hmmm...

This is exactly my experience as you describe it. I too have HPTuners. I'll take Topless Texan's advice and do some logging while it's doing this. I'm fairly certain it's strictly a "spark cutting" thing just as you believe.
Damn few useful PIDs. Most of what I'm curious about is related to the EBTCM inputs.
OTOH, if any of those inputs for any reason result in the torque reduction requests, you can notice that via the desired torque PID.
Did see some nice clear statements in the service manual (one step up from the owner's manual
) that the PCM and EBTCM both participate in TC. The PCM does it by pulling timing and closing the throttle while the EBTCM does it by applying rear brakes, bearing in mind the EBTCM also specifies the desired torque (nominally the max torque value in the PCM cal) based on it's own assessments of it's various inputs.The braking actions of the EBTCM seem to be difficult to monitor, though I think you could do it with a Tech-II or the like. The PCM actions are much easier to monitor. The difficulty there might be the getting APP and TPS PIDs quickly since they're sort of second hand by way of the TAC. Better slow than none I guess.
Based on your description, I'm inclined to think you'll see PCM actions, but not triggered by the EBTCM's desired torque messages - I think that would light up the DIC. (You could probably test that theory by reducing the max torque parameter that everybody maxes out to a much smaller number.) If you don't see clamping due to EBTCM desired torque messages, you've eliminated a lot of possibilities.
If you see good agreement between the APP and TPS values that only leaves spark, which should be easy enough to see. Also, I did run across a TM/TC/Abuse throttle tip-in parameter I hadn't noticed before browsing around in EFILive's tuner earlier. I'll go back and peek at it again. I don't do much EFLive tuning on my '98 yet.

Still curious to hear what issues like this the line lock guys have or don't have.











