When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's the secondary AIR system. This code indicates both banks so you may have either a wire off/fuse/etc. so it isn't powering up "or" check the rubber hose that comes out from the wheel housing under the master cylinder and connects to the metal tube under the master cylinder. If this is off this code would also set. Bad O2's or check valves can cause this as well, but likely the pump isn't running.
It seems to be pulling stronger now that I've run it for a couple days. There is a noticeable increase in power above about 4500 rpms and it doesn't stop pulling, I'll need to adjust the rev limiter. If a tune will give me a bit more low end response then I think I'll be quite happy with this setup. Looks like headers are next.
If you are going to go with a set of long tube headers for this setup be sure and check with your shop to make sure your tuner is willing to retune it for a nominal fee. Otherwise you may consider waiting to get it tuned or expediting your header purchase.
My first impressions are very disappointing, it doesn't seem to have any more power than it used to. I didn't take it past 3K rpms but I was expecting *something* down low. Hopefully the computer will adjust soon. It does sound and feel a bit "healthier" but it is hard to quantify.
Kermit (just kidding), first off, the cam you put in typically doesn't put out any more torque than stock until well over 3k rpm. I saw another member's before/after dyno graph, and he didn't pick anything up until 3,500, I believe. Second, when I put in my head/cam combo, before I got her tuned, it felt exactly the same. I didn't get on it at all, but within a normal driving rpm range, with 1/4 throttle, I was feeling absolutely no difference. After the tune, I could tell a ton of difference. The before/after dyno graph showed a good 50lb ft of torque at 2,500rpm, and you could feel it. But without a tune, it just didn't seem to be there. Wait till you get her tuned up, and get the rpm's up. I guarantee you'll be singing its praises once you have it cranked up over 4,000rpm.
Kermit (just kidding), first off, the cam you put in typically doesn't put out any more torque than stock until well over 3k rpm. I saw another member's before/after dyno graph, and he didn't pick anything up until 3,500, I believe. Second, when I put in my head/cam combo, before I got her tuned, it felt exactly the same. I didn't get on it at all, but within a normal driving rpm range, with 1/4 throttle, I was feeling absolutely no difference. After the tune, I could tell a ton of difference. The before/after dyno graph showed a good 50lb ft of torque at 2,500rpm, and you could feel it. But without a tune, it just didn't seem to be there. Wait till you get her tuned up, and get the rpm's up. I guarantee you'll be singing its praises once you have it cranked up over 4,000rpm.
I've been driving it hard and I am finally starting to see some power, but it doesn't kick in until the upper rpm range as you said. I've got an appointment for a tune at Synergy in a week, I'll post some dyno numbers. Hind sight being 20/20 I should have used a TR224 cam, oh well. Even without a tune I can feel the difference, especially up top. It has been a very fun and informative project, I know quite a bit more about the car than I did before. I'll be shooting for headers and a retune next summer I think.
Any advice on how high I should set the fuel cutoff with this cam? I am currently hitting the stock limiter and it still wants to pull hard. I was thinking 6400 rpms would be a nice safe number.
I've been driving it hard and I am finally starting to see some power, but it doesn't kick in until the upper rpm range as you said.
Most H/C Vettes make more HP than torque, its the kind of power wont feel down low. Once you cross the more HP than torque line by a decent amount, the cars characteristics change big time.
Last edited by Chevy Guy; Jul 28, 2007 at 09:03 AM.
Most H/C Vettes make more HP than torque, its the kind of power wont feel down low. Once you cross the more HP than torque line by a decent amount, the cars characteristics change big time.
I don't know that you can attribute a milder low-end to the spread in hp and torque. He's probably looking at a 20 point spread between torque and hp (according to Thunder Racing's site, and other posts on this and the LS1tech forum). I am at a 20 point spread (390/410) with my setup, and I have all kinds of fun torque down low.
I don't know that you can attribute a milder low-end to the spread in hp and torque. He's probably looking at a 20 point spread between torque and hp (according to Thunder Racing's site, and other posts on this and the LS1tech forum). I am at a 20 point spread (390/410) with my setup, and I have all kinds of fun torque down low.
I hope you're right on that one. We'll see after I get it tuned this Friday. If I get anywhere near 400 anything I will be ecstatic.
I don't know that you can attribute a milder low-end to the spread in hp and torque. He's probably looking at a 20 point spread between torque and hp (according to Thunder Racing's site, and other posts on this and the LS1tech forum). I am at a 20 point spread (390/410) with my setup, and I have all kinds of fun torque down low.
390/410 ain't so bad. What does your dyno sheet look like? Peak torque numbers mean little without knowing what the curve looks like. Most larger aftermarket cams shift power higher in the RPM range and almost always at the detriment of low RPM, street style drivability. A good tune can get a lot of that low range back.
390/410 ain't so bad. What does your dyno sheet look like? Peak torque numbers mean little without knowing what the curve looks like. Most larger aftermarket cams shift power higher in the RPM range and almost always at the detriment of low RPM, street style drivability. A good tune can get a lot of that low range back.
I agree 100%. When I was trying to pick my cam, I didn't pay attention to any setup that couldn't provide a dyno graph. Here's mine. Notice the nice low-end, but still decent high-side.
I had Synergy do the tune and so far I've been pretty happy with the results:
I'm amazed at how much my mileage went up, at least 30% (higher on the highway). The car pulls very linearly though I would have liked a bit more low end. On a terribly slick track I shaved off over .6 seconds with more wheel spin than I had before. Looks like headers are next .