When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If you make a bit more power and it takes a bit less throttle opening to maintain that speed you will see an improvement in mpg.Was the duct and MAF relocation the cause of this? Who knows,could just as well of been the 10 degree cooler ambient temp.I am just reporting what I saw on my cars readout on a 50 mile straight line,cruise control on trip to the track. But the lack of that MAF code reappearing and the better idle quality are facts.
Were you using A/C with this 10 degree cooler temps?
A/c settings werent touched, but it may not have cycled on as much.It was still 85 degrees out and 90% humidity!
Bingo! You anticipated where I was going. I can believe this has more of an affect then anything you did in front of the throttle plate. Other less obvious factors can be prevailing winds.
Keeping an eye on it around town now as the temps have climbed back into the normal mid 90's,time will tell.An engine is merely an air pump,if you improve flow and the computer can adjust for it,HP and MPG can be better.
This is cool, I'm learning alot more about the role the MAF plays in the bigger picture. I know we're digressing from the OP's original question and I hope he doesn't mind....
If I'm understanding all this great info correctly... relocating the MAF MAY change it's input to the PCM and (technically) may reflect a more accurate reading of the actual laminar airflow hitting the TB. Assuming the airstream had a chance to settle down while traversing the bridge/coupler... Note: I think this may be more accurate for people using the twin cone assemblies.
Now this new signal may not be accurate due to the static translation table stored in the PCM right? This is where I was getting confused... I thought that table was dynamic, in other words would eventually be adjusted to account for the changes in the upstream O2 sensors outputs, as an example...
I find it interesting that the tables are different for different vehicles... Airmass is airmass after all no matter what motor it's being sucked into. I suppose it's another area that can be tweaked for tuning purposes though...
Thinking more about this, it might make more sense to relocate the temp sensor closer to the TB to take into account heat soak from the engine... I wonder what THAT would screw up????
Tim
Well,heres the verdict,I installed the Vararam power duct today with the relocation of the MAF sensor near the throttle body,no issues whats so ever,easy install,all works and runs normal!
Well,heres the verdict,I installed the Vararam power duct today with the relocation of the MAF sensor near the throttle body,no issues whats so ever,easy install,all works and runs normal!
Wow! That must be disappointing! I thought the whole point was to make it run better.