When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi all, I broke a valve spring in my '02Z in the fall - got lucky and just had to change one spring - but I'm now replacing all 16 as a precaution.
What are the specs for the stock LS6 springs?
I'd like to put an aftermarket spring in but I want to put the WEAKEST possible spring in there as to not overtax the rest of the OEM valvetrain (upgrading to stronger springs is pointless with a stock cam and an otherwise stock engine...)
As far as I can tell the Comp 918's are popular, any other "weak" spring upgrades I should be aware of?
Thanks!
P.S. I don't want this to turn into a "what spring is best" thead.
If you have the stock cam or .550 lift or less for the cost it is hard to beat the stock LS6 springs (yellow). I run them in my race engine ( low lift cam) and just change them every season. I have never broken one or had other issues (i.e. weakening and loosing rpm's).
There are lots of good single beehive springs out there. The 918's have had some issues in the past but hopefully have resolved those issues.
You can generally stay with a single beehive spring up to .575/.600 lift.
stock LS6 spring is 90lbs closed @1.8" open 294 lbs @1.25" comp cams makes a beehive spring that is direct replacement but is triple the price of stock ls6 springs and has a tad more seat pressure 105 lbs@1.8 installed height (SCOOGIN-DICKEY) $56 VS $155 I'm gonna replace my stock springs on my 85k stock Z/06 with GM SPRINGS I will be replacing the keepers also.Keepers fail when they have a lot of time on them so replacement is recommended they are also inexpensive.I consider valve springs "wear" items as you don't know when they start to get weak and either bounce on the seat or start to "float" (not good) as the only indication is the car starts to slow down but sometimes its so gradual you don't notice.I think that probably most of the broken springs did not break cause they were old /worn out but as a result of losing their tension and floating (not following the contures of the cam) and while floating come in contact with the piston
I would use either the PAC1218 or PAC1518, we stock both of them and they are great for what you want. The spring pressures are slightly higher than stock but not at all something to worry about.
If you want cheaper, use the 1218, if you are willing to pay another $50 for longer life and even less worry, get the 1518 as they are nitrided. The 1518 is good to .650 lift, but that's irrelevant as the pressures are the same as the 1218
I got the PAC1218's, but you should look into getting the PAC1215's as they have less pressure. I can't remember the exact numbers, but I would have bought them if they hadn't been out of stock at the time I was buying.
I got the PAC1218's, but you should look into getting the PAC1215's as they have less pressure.
Hmmm...
If K RIPPER is right about the stock LS6 springs ("90lbs closed @1.8" open 294 lbs @1.25"), then I have a question about the 1215's on the LS6 cam...
PAC claims 293lbs @ .600" lift (1.200" height), so at the lesser lift as reported by the stock LS6 spring measurement (.550" lift or 1.250" height) the PAC 1215 would only have about 277lbs of open force.
If the GM spring is rated at 294 that would make me a bit nervous... I doubt GM put much "extra" stiffness into their valve springs, rather, I bet they did a PILE of testing to get them just above the minimum requirements for the cam profile. Looks like the 1215 may have been conceived as an LS1 spring replacement, not an LS6 spring raplacement.
On that same note, the open force on the stock LS6 cam for the 1218 and 1518 would be about 302lbs, only 8lbs higher than the stock springs. Looks like PAC has designed a spring that's taller than the LS6 spring with a lower K value.
This looks like a no-brainer replacement... 1218 for stock/budget minded and 1518 for long life/worry free/upgradeability. For $65 extra from SDPC the 1518 looks like the way to go.
Last edited by Blue Angel; May 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM.
If it were my car I would go with the new LS6 springs. They were improved in 2004. The old part # was 12565313 and the newer replacement is part# 12586484. The spring rate is about 60Nm.
If it were my car I would go with the new LS6 springs. They were improved in 2004. The old part # was 12565313 and the newer replacement is part#. The spring rate is about 60Nm.
That's the part number for an individual spring. $9 each (approx) x 16 = $144. A whole set from GM under the kit part number of 12499224 is $56.95. If you want to stay with stock LS6 springs, that's the part number you'll want.
I still support upgrading to an aftermarket spring, however.
That's the part number for an individual spring. $9 each (approx) x 16 = $144. A whole set from GM under the kit part number of 12499224 is $56.95. If you want to stay with stock LS6 springs, that's the part number you'll want.
I still support upgrading to an aftermarket spring, however.
Thanks for pointing that out. Yep, the number I had was for individual springs.
Why would go with aftermarker over the stock spring?
Thanks for all the help and great info, guys/gals! This forum is what makes this car so practical to own - I can't imagine having to pay and trust someone else to do all this for me...