When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My 99 has a Borg Warner tranny, will Tremec pull out your transmission and make repairs based on their recommendation for your unit?
The info I gave for the Dexron 3 came out of the FSM for 1999 Corvette's so I know that's good, my concern with synthetics is from warnings of other forum members, so proceed at your own risk.
Tremec bought Borg Warner around 2001. The tech I talked to was a former BW tech who built MN6's for C5s.
I have no problem with Dexron 3. I'm just reporting what I was told by the manufacturer.
during the many discussions on this topic around here it has also been thrown out there numerous times that amsoil torque drive is a good synthetic for the paper backed rings.
during the many discussions on this topic around here it has also been thrown out there numerous times that amsoil torque drive is a good synthetic for the paper backed rings.
This fluid is synthetic and does meet Dexron III specs which is the spec for the manual in the Corvette. There are many forum members with early C5s with paper blocker rings using this fluid and to the best of my knowledge, none have reported problems. FYI, this is the same fluid I use in mine at the track.
As for the comment about about not needing to change the tranny fluid, my experience is that factory fluids shear low out of viscosity grade very rapidly. I bought an 06 CTS-V (same tranny) used with 7k miles on it and changed the tranny fluid to AMSOIL at about 10k mile and submitted the factory fill to Blackstone for analysis. It had sheared low out of grade. 2006 Cadillac CTS-V Used Oil Analysis Dexron III vs AMSOIL ATF Transmission Fluid
Your 99 6 speed should not have anything but Dexron 3 ATF. I understand our early manuals can be damaged by using synthetic fluids. We have "paper" blockers that will be destroyed with Mobile 1 ect.
Originally Posted by 00 Rooster
do some research on the fluid before you buy it. I have a 2000 and went with the amsoil as research here told me not to get synthetic fluid due to the paper/cellulos blocker rings-I don't know what those are but I know they don't like synthetic fluid according to my fellow CF brethren
Dexron 6 will work fine in the early 6 speed manual transmissions. It will NOT damage anything in the transmission. What it will do is make the transmission shift like new or better. Other synthetic base fluids might work fine, but make sure the fluid manufacture will back their product for the use.
Originally Posted by 68Bullitt
+1. The Dexron 3 is still available at Walmart and O'Reilly. I just did this on my '98. Shifts better after the change. Well worth $11 in fluid and an hour of my time.
The fluid you purchase may work fine, however, the term on their container with reference to “Dexron 3” means nothing! True Dexron 3 is no longer made. Call the fluid manufacture and find out if they will back their product if it damages your model of transmission. Get it in writing.
Originally Posted by f6john
The info I gave for the Dexron 3 came out of the FSM for 1999 Corvette's so I know that's good, my concern with synthetics is from warnings of other forum members, so proceed at your own risk.
Not really. You cannot purchase true Dexron 3. You are getting something that the fluid manufacture thinks will be ok. Unless you purchase something licensed to carry the Dexron 6 or purchase GM fluid #88861800, you really don’t know what you are getting, even if it has Dexron 3 all over the container. Dexron 3, DEX3, Dexron III etc. can be used by anyone and mean nothing anymore. If you buy something other than Dexron 6 or GM fluid #88861800, just make sure the fluid manufacture will stand behind their product in writing.
the term on their container with reference to “Dexron 3” means nothing! True Dexron 3 is no longer made.
If a fluid states that it's compatible with the Dexron III spec then it's fine.
Specs change over time; it's just important to ensure prior specifications are "met or exceeded". For example, Valvoline Dexron VI notes that it is "For all General Motors cars and trucks that require DEXRON®-VI, DEXRON®-III and DEXRON®-II"
Dexron is a registered trademark that reflects compliance with a spect and can't be used without permission from GM.
If a fluid states that it's compatible with the Dexron III spec then it's fine.
Specs change over time; it's just important to ensure prior specifications are "met or exceeded". For example, Valvoline Dexron VI notes that it is "For all General Motors cars and trucks that require DEXRON®-VI, DEXRON®-III and DEXRON®-II"
Dexron is a registered trademark that reflects compliance with a spect and can't be used without permission from GM.
What you say was once true, but not the case anymore.
All DEXRON-III licenses expired at the end of 2006, and will not be renewed. Beyond that date, General Motors will only support the use of DEXRON-VI fluids for use in Hydra-Matic transmissions.[1] Fluids claiming DEXRON-III type performance continue to be sold under abbreviated names such as Dex/Merc and D/M, however, since the DEXRON-III licensing system no longer exists, these fluids are not regulated by GM in any way. I don't trust a lot of things from Wikipedia, but in this case they have it correct. Link.
What you say was once true, but not the case anymore.
True for the trademark, thank you, but you should probabaly put the whole quote here, or at least the following:
"DEXRON®-VI licensed fluids are fully backward compatible and can be used in all applications covered by earlier GM ATF specifications."
Hence my comment:
Originally Posted by billla
If a fluid states that it's compatible with the Dexron III spec then it's fine.
Specs change over time; it's just important to ensure prior specifications are "met or exceeded". For example, Valvoline Dexron VI notes that it is "For all General Motors cars and trucks that require DEXRON®-VI, DEXRON®-III and DEXRON®-II"
True for the trademark, thank you, but you should probabaly put the whole quote here, or at least the following:
"DEXRON®-VI licensed fluids are fully backward compatible and can be used in all applications covered by earlier GM ATF specifications."
Hence my comment:
Let me see if a can word this a little better. If you are buying replacement transmission fluid that states it complies with Dexron – VI, it is backward compatible due to the fact that it is Dexron – VI.
What folks need to understand, there are so called replacement transmission fluids that state they are replacements for Dexron III or state that they are Dexron III without mention of Dexron VI. This should throw a red flag, and in my opinion is a deceptive way to sell a product by trying to use what once was a licensed name that is no longer made.
It’s your vehicle. Use what you feel is best. I’m just suggesting that you understand what you are buying.
What folks need to understand, there are so called replacement transmission fluids that state they are replacements for Dexron III or state that they are Dexron III without mention of Dexron VI. This should throw a red flag, and in my opinion is a deceptive way to sell a product by trying to use what once was a licensed name that is no longer made.
The product name was trademarked, but not the spec. The spec for the C5 manual tranny was and still is Dexron III. Dexron VI spec calls for a viscosity about 40% lower than that of Dexron III. I would not use it in a C5 tranny.
The product name was trademarked, but not the spec. The spec for the C5 manual tranny was and still is Dexron III. Dexron VI spec calls for a viscosity about 40% lower than that of Dexron III. I would not use it in a C5 tranny.
It use to be that in order for a fluid manufacture to put the name Dexron on their product they were required to prove their product performed properly in GM vehicles. If you wish to read some of what was required I would suggest reading this DOCUMENT by Jack Zakarian Consulting Engineer, Lubrication Technology Group of Chevron Products Company.
Guess who’s minding the shop now in regards to Dexron III?
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by Subdriver
The product name was trademarked, but not the spec. The spec for the C5 manual tranny was and still is Dexron III. Dexron VI spec calls for a viscosity about 40% lower than that of Dexron III. I would not use it in a C5 tranny.
Dex VI is backwards compatible for automatic transmissions only, not 6 speeds. That's why GM now specifies their synchromesh for all the kazillion 6-speeds out there that came filled with Dex III.
Personally I now use a 50% mix of Amsoil ATD/ATF in my RPM unit. Works great.
Dex VI is backwards compatible for automatic transmissions only, not 6 speeds. That's why GM now specifies their synchromesh for all the kazillion 6-speeds out there that came filled with Dex III.
Personally I now use a 50% mix of Amsoil ATD/ATF in my RPM unit. Works great.
How does the viscosity of Mobil 1 ATF compare to the viscosity of Dexron III or GM Synchromesh?
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by flynhi
How does the viscosity of Mobil 1 ATF compare to the viscosity of Dexron III or GM Synchromesh?
Depends on what particular spec Mobil 1 says it meets. If it says Dex VI then it is a lower vis than the Dex III and certainly much lower than Synchromesh which is designed for manual transmissions that use ATF, not automatics.
Many, if not all, of the same companies that were previously manufacturing Dexron III under license by GM, are still manufacturing the exact same formula product, but are no longer licensed by GM since GM discontinued it's licensing program for everyone but still owns the trademark name. These manufacturers are now referring to it as "meets Dexron III requirements" or "recommended where Dexron III is specified", or words to that effect, etc, etc.
Dexron VI was formulated for fuel economy purposes primarily.