O2 Sensor Question.
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,774
Likes: 363
From: Midland TX
O2 Sensor Question.
I have heard that sometimes the Front O2 Sensors can get "lazy" and that can affect gas mileage, etc. Is that also true of the Rear O2 Sensors - can they also affect gas mileage?
I have about 52,000 miles on mine.
I have about 52,000 miles on mine.
Le Mans Master
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 328
From: CA.
St. Jude Donor '13-'14-'15
Yes the rears only report the condition of the cats
However--they also report the "heat of the cats as well---When they overheat-- the ECM dumps extra raw fuel into the intake to cool them down---And YES it can cost you fuel mileage !!! Most tuner simply disable or turn OFF the cat overtemp system (COT)
A lazy Front 02 of course may cost you some fuel mileage as your fuel trims won't be able to correct the fuel mixture acurately or fast enough--You can check for a lazy 02 with any basic scanner that shows "real time data" The front 02 voltages should be oscilating very rapidly between .100- .950 millivolts
However--they also report the "heat of the cats as well---When they overheat-- the ECM dumps extra raw fuel into the intake to cool them down---And YES it can cost you fuel mileage !!! Most tuner simply disable or turn OFF the cat overtemp system (COT)
A lazy Front 02 of course may cost you some fuel mileage as your fuel trims won't be able to correct the fuel mixture acurately or fast enough--You can check for a lazy 02 with any basic scanner that shows "real time data" The front 02 voltages should be oscilating very rapidly between .100- .950 millivolts
Tech Contributor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,100
Likes: 17
From: Somers, CT and Clermont, FL
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,450
Likes: 410
From: Portland OR
Other than the length of the leads and the connector style, what exactly is the difference between the front and rear sensors?
Fronts are AFS75 and the rears are AFS139. I couldn't find any definitive technical data on either.
Ron
Fronts are AFS75 and the rears are AFS139. I couldn't find any definitive technical data on either.
Ron
Tech Contributor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,100
Likes: 17
From: Somers, CT and Clermont, FL
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Team Owner
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 22,025
Likes: 192
From: At the beach in little Rhody
I was under the impression, right or wrong, that the fronts and rears also have different heaters (rear are heated more) and the rears also switch at a different rate than the fronts.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained
Joe Kucinski
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Verdad Gallardo
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Tech Contributor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,100
Likes: 17
From: Somers, CT and Clermont, FL
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Any perceived switching rate differences, from front to rear, are likely due to the sampling rates of the ECM.
The fronts are likely to be sampled at a faster rate, by the ECM, because they are responsible for the actual control of the air/fuel mixture. The rears only measure the catalytic converter efficiency.
Tech Contributor
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 32,910
Likes: 2,402
From: Anthony TX
CI 6,7,8,9,11 Vet
St. Jude Donor '08
I don't see how the switching rates of the sensors, from front to rear, can be any different. All O2 sensors are designed to only generate a millivolt output, that is proportional to the amount of oxygen in the exhaust stream.
Any perceived switching rate differences, from front to rear, are likely due to the sampling rates of the ECM.
The fronts are likely to be sampled at a faster rate, by the ECM, because they are responsible for the actual control of the air/fuel mixture. The rears only measure the catalytic converter efficiency.
Any perceived switching rate differences, from front to rear, are likely due to the sampling rates of the ECM.
The fronts are likely to be sampled at a faster rate, by the ECM, because they are responsible for the actual control of the air/fuel mixture. The rears only measure the catalytic converter efficiency.
100% correct!!! The PCM samples the output of the O2 sensor. It adjusts the duty cycle of the injectors to ADD or REMOVE fuel to maintain a 14.7/1 AFR. It’s the PCM changing the output of the injectors that causes the oscillation of the O2 sensor output.Something that I didn’t know until recently is the PCM supplies the signal wire with 450 mv. The oxygen content or lack of oxygen content of the exhaust will either cause the output to increase or decrease. That’s why a damaged or worn out O2 sensor shows a constant 450 mv output.
I have an ACTRON scanner that reads the O2 sensor data. When you stomp on the accelerator the O2 sensor output will peg high (enriched mixture and when you decelerate it pegs low (lean) It can stay high or low for quite a while until your no longer in a Power Enrichment or Decel condition.
Both of those conditions DO NOT rely on O2 sensor data as the PCM switched to a PE or Decel "TABLE" to control fuel.
From all the info that I have seen, the major difference between the Front and REAR O2 sensors is the rear sensors have a more robust heater element to keep it operating at the correct temp as it is far removed from the heat of the combustion chamber.
Kick me if I stated anything stupid!
BC
Drifting
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 15
From: Seattle WA
100% correct!!! The PCM samples the output of the O2 sensor. It adjusts the duty cycle of the injectors to ADD or REMOVE fuel to maintain a 14.7/1 AFR. It’s the PCM changing the output of the injectors that causes the oscillation of the O2 sensor output.Something that I didn’t know until recently is the PCM supplies the signal wire with 450 mv. The oxygen content or lack of oxygen content of the exhaust will either cause the output to increase or decrease. That’s why a damaged or worn out O2 sensor shows a constant 450 mv output.
I have an ACTRON scanner that reads the O2 sensor data. When you stomp on the accelerator the O2 sensor output will peg high (enriched mixture and when you decelerate it pegs low (lean) It can stay high or low for quite a while until your no longer in a Power Enrichment or Decel condition.
Both of those conditions DO NOT rely on O2 sensor data as the PCM switched to a PE or Decel "TABLE" to control fuel.
From all the info that I have seen, the major difference between the Front and REAR O2 sensors is the rear sensors have a more robust heater element to keep it operating at the correct temp as it is far removed from the heat of the combustion chamber.
Kick me if I stated anything stupid!
BC
Tech Contributor
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 32,910
Likes: 2,402
From: Anthony TX
CI 6,7,8,9,11 Vet
St. Jude Donor '08
CORRECT. 
Thats why I stated :
" That’s why a damaged or worn out O2 sensor shows a constant 450 mv output. "
Heres the HO2S schematic and you can see the HIGH and LOW reff from the PCM:
Thats why I stated :" That’s why a damaged or worn out O2 sensor shows a constant 450 mv output. "
Heres the HO2S schematic and you can see the HIGH and LOW reff from the PCM:
Tech Contributor
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 32,910
Likes: 2,402
From: Anthony TX
CI 6,7,8,9,11 Vet
St. Jude Donor '08
More substantiated data!
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,450
Likes: 410
From: Portland OR
Drumroll please...........Cymbol crash!
Ok, so I measured my original rear sensors and one front sensor. I seem to have mispalced the other.
I set the supply at 14v and measured the current draw.
The rears draw 900mA (0.9 Amps)after fully warmed up.
The front draws 950mA (0.95 amps) after fully warmed up.
Essentially, no difference between them.
Of course the current is higher when cold as the heater resistance goes up with temp.
I also measured a brand new front sensor that I will use in my build.
Very interesting. It measures 600ma (0.6 Amps) fully warmed up. It also gets hotter.
Also, note the difference in construction from old to new. The new one just might fis better in tight areas like with headers. also note the change in the tip.
My originals are pretty much plugged up!
Hope this helps clear up some mystery.
Ron
Ok, so I measured my original rear sensors and one front sensor. I seem to have mispalced the other.
I set the supply at 14v and measured the current draw.
The rears draw 900mA (0.9 Amps)after fully warmed up.
The front draws 950mA (0.95 amps) after fully warmed up.
Essentially, no difference between them.
Of course the current is higher when cold as the heater resistance goes up with temp.
I also measured a brand new front sensor that I will use in my build.
Very interesting. It measures 600ma (0.6 Amps) fully warmed up. It also gets hotter.
Also, note the difference in construction from old to new. The new one just might fis better in tight areas like with headers. also note the change in the tip.
My originals are pretty much plugged up!
Hope this helps clear up some mystery.
Ron
Heel & Toe
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Drumroll please...........Cymbol crash!
Ok, so I measured my original rear sensors and one front sensor. I seem to have mispalced the other.
I set the supply at 14v and measured the current draw.
The rears draw 900mA (0.9 Amps)after fully warmed up.
The front draws 950mA (0.95 amps) after fully warmed up.
Essentially, no difference between them.
Of course the current is higher when cold as the heater resistance goes up with temp.
I also measured a brand new front sensor that I will use in my build.
Very interesting. It measures 600ma (0.6 Amps) fully warmed up. It also gets hotter.
Also, note the difference in construction from old to new. The new one just might fis better in tight areas like with headers. also note the change in the tip.
My originals are pretty much plugged up!
Hope this helps clear up some mystery.
Ron
Ok, so I measured my original rear sensors and one front sensor. I seem to have mispalced the other.
I set the supply at 14v and measured the current draw.
The rears draw 900mA (0.9 Amps)after fully warmed up.
The front draws 950mA (0.95 amps) after fully warmed up.
Essentially, no difference between them.
Of course the current is higher when cold as the heater resistance goes up with temp.
I also measured a brand new front sensor that I will use in my build.
Very interesting. It measures 600ma (0.6 Amps) fully warmed up. It also gets hotter.
Also, note the difference in construction from old to new. The new one just might fis better in tight areas like with headers. also note the change in the tip.
My originals are pretty much plugged up!
Hope this helps clear up some mystery.
Ron
Where have you bought the new front sensor?
//C5Swede
Safety Car
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,572
Likes: 9
From: Jackson Tn
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09
Drumroll please...........Cymbol crash!
Ok, so I measured my original rear sensors and one front sensor. I seem to have mispalced the other.
I set the supply at 14v and measured the current draw.
The rears draw 900mA (0.9 Amps)after fully warmed up.
The front draws 950mA (0.95 amps) after fully warmed up.
Essentially, no difference between them.
Of course the current is higher when cold as the heater resistance goes up with temp.
I also measured a brand new front sensor that I will use in my build.
Very interesting. It measures 600ma (0.6 Amps) fully warmed up. It also gets hotter.
Also, note the difference in construction from old to new. The new one just might fis better in tight areas like with headers. also note the change in the tip.
My originals are pretty much plugged up!
Hope this helps clear up some mystery.
Ron
Ok, so I measured my original rear sensors and one front sensor. I seem to have mispalced the other.
I set the supply at 14v and measured the current draw.
The rears draw 900mA (0.9 Amps)after fully warmed up.
The front draws 950mA (0.95 amps) after fully warmed up.
Essentially, no difference between them.
Of course the current is higher when cold as the heater resistance goes up with temp.
I also measured a brand new front sensor that I will use in my build.
Very interesting. It measures 600ma (0.6 Amps) fully warmed up. It also gets hotter.
Also, note the difference in construction from old to new. The new one just might fis better in tight areas like with headers. also note the change in the tip.
My originals are pretty much plugged up!
Hope this helps clear up some mystery.
Ron
the new one looks like an NGK brand. I tried running those and had to remove them and go back to my originals. Maybe I got some bad ones but I couldn't get them to work right and I think it was from not getting hot enough with headers.
BTW, with software you can change the switch points of the O2's to make it run richer or leaner. I had to adjust my switch points because of the ethanol in the fuel I have here.
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,450
Likes: 410
From: Portland OR
GM part number 19178930.
AC Delco part number AFS75
Right out of the box.
There are no identifying marks on the sensor itself.
So this is what you get from GM now.
Have a new one in the box for my 06 Cobalt SS.
Made by NTK, has the gM part number on it.
Clearly from my measurements, the new part is less wattage. I don't know about the actual temp. That deals with the element, can't measure it from the outside.
Ron
AC Delco part number AFS75
Right out of the box.
There are no identifying marks on the sensor itself.
So this is what you get from GM now.
Have a new one in the box for my 06 Cobalt SS.
Made by NTK, has the gM part number on it.
Clearly from my measurements, the new part is less wattage. I don't know about the actual temp. That deals with the element, can't measure it from the outside.
Ron