When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Seems to confirm my assumption that they are using a mainly OEM piece. The "adjustability" is a band-aid for improperly shimmed units, IMO.
Jack
Jack
That appears to be the case (from the post). There is little to no info on this, they make all kind of hydraulics for other applications tho. I like the stock feel, and will most likely shy away from the RAM.
Originally Posted by johnson-rod
Contamination? Not necessarily.
I ran a leaking slave all winter one year. It would lose the entire reservoir overnight.
When I replaced it in the spring, the clutch and disk were dry as a bone. That was 45K miles ago and the clutch is still going strong.
This^ brings light into this dark world.
Originally Posted by tak06
Jack, Thanks for the tip, I'll get them to check that b4 removing the driveline. I can keep the clutch parts for future use if it's only a loose bleeder screw.
When I took mine out, that bleeder screw was in there tight. I wonder what could have broke it's seal.
I'm not against a OEM slave just weighing my options. If Something's been designed for higher performance then I would want to go with that. Been told the Stock hydraulics arn't the greatest in the car too. So why would I get something that would blow from the pressure of the aftermarket clutch?
If it's good to go then that's what I gotta do. But if there's somethign better out there I would really like the peace of mind. Already dorked it up once.....
My OEM slave gave up after only 28K miles and 5 years on my coupe. Luckily I had GMPP because it was out of new car warranty. I put a new C5 Z06 clutch and pressure plate since they had it torn down to rreplace the slave and only cost me for parts. So if there is a better unit out there it may be worth it.
My OEM slave gave up after only 28K miles and 5 years on my coupe. Luckily I had GMPP because it was out of new car warranty. I put a new C5 Z06 clutch and pressure plate since they had it torn down to rreplace the slave and only cost me for parts. So if there is a better unit out there it may be worth it.
Well, this puts me on the fence again
Honestly it does look like that's my only option. The opinions are so diverse with the hydraulics, and I'm loosing more and more pressure by the day, it feels like it's barely dis-engaging the clutch now. Still no flid seepage, I even held the clutch down to retain pressure overnight, and no fluid. When I bled the line no bubbles came out either. I sometimes think I don't have a slave cylinder at all, just a teenage spring that sometimes does what you ask and takes all your money.
Honestly it does look like that's my only option. The opinions are so diverse with the hydraulics, and I'm loosing more and more pressure by the day, it feels like it's barely dis-engaging the clutch now. Still no flid seepage, I even held the clutch down to retain pressure overnight, and no fluid. When I bled the line no bubbles came out either. I sometimes think I don't have a slave cylinder at all, just a teenage spring that sometimes does what you ask and takes all your money.
Sounds like a master cylinder problem if there isn't any leakage.
Had my slave and the entire clutch assembly replaced today on my 12k. mile car. Had the inspection plate removed and the tech could'nt see any leaks but told him to replace everything anyways as the pedal was occasionally sticking to the floor.
In fact after disassembly he found the leak from the slave, I guess it must have evaporated on the way to the dealership.
The new OEM clutch engages about half inch from the floor now, hard to get use to.
And you need the practice with the "quick disconnect" fitting for the slave swap.
You read my mind. I have a Tick MC on it's way and I'm just going to replace everything. My thinking is the new MC will allow me to drive it better form time to time so i can save up time a $$ for the SC replacement. Mainly because I'm giong to have another clutch on hand incase of contamination.
I think he may be referring to a C6 slave with the dust boot.
Yes, my bad. I was just helping a bud with his C6 and when I read this thread, it was like deja vu all over again ... only it's not deja vu, because the boot is a C6 / XLR item.
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by Tron Z
Yes, my bad. I was just helping a bud with his C6 and when I read this thread, it was like deja vu all over again ... only it's not deja vu, because the boot is a C6 / XLR item.
My apologies!
No worries, BTDT.
I really wish we had a boot on the C5 though. Don't know if a C6 boot could be modified to work on a C5, or maybe someone will come out with an adapter for the quick-connect hydraulic fitting so a stock C6 slave could be bolted up. GM obviously thought enough of the value of a boot to incorporate it into the design of C6s.
Maybe the C6 housing could be modified to accept a C5 hose?
[QUOTE=Maybe the C6 housing could be modified to accept a C5 hose?
Prolly wishful thinking. [/QUOTE]
I would think that it would be simple enough to fab a completely new hose using AN fittings and braided hose. The boot should cut down on the black muck accumulation in the reservoir and the resulting premature failures of the hydraulic components. Surely someone has tried this mod, no?
Instructions for the master cylinder said to "bottom out" the adjustment linkage for the clutch lever. DONE! However it won't reach to the pedal. Now I can turn the linkage out and extend the pedal, but it doesn't seem like it's at it's "lowest adjustment" any more; as per the manufature directions. And the directions seemed to have left out this little detail of initial extension.
Instructions for the master cylinder said to "bottom out" the adjustment linkage for the clutch lever. DONE! However it won't reach to the pedal. Now I can turn the linkage out and extend the pedal, but it doesn't seem like it's at it's "lowest adjustment" any more; as per the manufature directions. And the directions seemed to have left out this little detail of initial extension.
Am I on the right track?
You mean with the pedal all the way up, with the aid of the return spring? You will likely need to depress the pedal partially to attach the heim joint on the end of the arm. That is normal with with the adjustable setups. You start with the arm fully compressed, and adjust outward until you achieve full disengagement. Many people (including myself) take the assist spring off the clutch pedal during this job. I don't find it necessary and prefer a truer pedal feel.
My pedal does not return fully with my Tick master, LS7 clutch/pp, and properly shimmed OEM slave. I would estimate that I have roughly half the pedal travel of a stock setup. This is because the Tilton cylinder displaces so much more fluid than a stock setup that the slave moves much farther than it does with a stock master as a result the same amount of pedal throw. You could MAKE it return fully the the stock location, but it would require installing a pedal stop at the point of clutch disengagement to avoid hyper-extension of the slave, which is more work that I bothered to do for my personal car.
Tick just takes a Tilton cylinder, slaps on a dual-threaded-adapter-thingy, throws a heim joint on the end, and calls it done. It's far from perfect. All they are trying to avoid is someone hyper-extending and ruining the slave. Use common sense and make sure that your attachment is at the "shortest" setting that can physically connect the master to the pedal.
Jack
Last edited by cptinjak; Oct 31, 2012 at 05:57 PM.