When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am a member of another forum on oil analysis and they are currently starting an oil filter study much more comprehensive then the old minimopar study of cut up filters. The flow rate is being measured with some interesting initial results. Check it out at:
this test shows why using heavier oil that 5W -30 on startup will cause the oil filter bypass to open and let unfiltered oil thru the engine. this is also why blocking the oil filter bypass is a good thing. :chevy
Not sure I agree on blocking the by-pass. I think this test shows that your engine may starve for oil if you do so. It should be interesting when they get the heaters working and then do tests with the oil at temperature.
Knize's study has been floating around the 'net for ages . . . and it is very informative (anyone that reads it pretty much goes on the Fram 'wagon' :D ), but it hasn't been updated in nearly 3 years and some of the info is getting dated. :)
i have fought an uphill battle ever since i said, we, at my work, don't like and won't use any mobil 1 products. That forum has all the information i've heard over the last 4-5 years about mobil 1 not being a true synthetic due to the laws governing oil manufacturing.
every race engine i ever built has had the filter bypass blocked and even my street engines with no problems.
Not sure I agree on blocking the by-pass. I think this test shows that your engine may starve for oil if you do so. It should be interesting when they get the heaters working and then do tests with the oil at temperature.
Alot of folks block the bypass on race engines to filter everything. One thing to remember is that the oil has to be up to temperature before you do anything. If you jack up the rpms with the oil cold it will destroy the filter from the pressure going too high... The bypass is a safety valve for a reason.
I read the reveiw and the first thing that came to mind was that they didn't really test for the filters abilitity to filter. My first thought was that maybe the filters that flowed the best didn't filter the best? I'm I making myself understood? :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
all good oil filter will withstand the oil pressure that any street engine puts out cold by a factor of 5 or more. the VW diesel rabbit had a 125 PSI cold oil pressure and no stock engine i know of has that kind of pressure. that is why 5W-30 is the best bet for street engine because it flows thru the filter easier and does not blow open the filter bypass as much. the reason a rear main on chevy engines get chewed up is because the dirty oil from the filter bypass goes there first. :chevy
RobsC5: I am currently running the AC UPF-44. However, I also just found out that when they stopped manufacturing them and then re-started they changed vendors and Champion is not making them. Don't know if that changes anything. Also, they just did the air test on the UPF-44 on the same web site.
Highroller: Agree with the filtering ability comment. That is coming soon on this same web site. May take some time to get through all the tests, but the results in the end should hopefully put to bed the heresay and inuendo about which filter to use. I am hoping we can gleen some good information from this testing that is being done. Stay tuned :yesnod:
RobsC5: I am currently running the AC UPF-44. However, I also just found out that when they stopped manufacturing them and then re-started they changed vendors and Champion is not making them. Don't know if that changes anything. Also, they just did the air test on the UPF-44 on the same web site.
Highroller: Agree with the filtering ability comment. That is coming soon on this same web site. May take some time to get through all the tests, but the results in the end should hopefully put to bed the heresay and inuendo about which filter to use. I am hoping we can gleen some good information from this testing that is being done. Stay tuned :yesnod:
That is absolutely fantastic, I'm not a big fan of " it has higher flow rates". If you gutted a filter you would also reach a full flow rate, not to say flow isn't important, it is, but there has to be a balance between flow and filtering. I'm looking forward to the outcome. :grouphug:
i have fought an uphill battle ever since i said, we, at my work, don't like and won't use any mobil 1 products. That forum has all the information i've heard over the last 4-5 years about mobil 1 not being a true synthetic due to the laws governing oil manufacturing.
:confused: :confused: :confused: Not quite sure what you POV is here. If you're saying that info on bobistheoilguy.com confirms the idea that Mobil1 engine oils are NOT true synthetics (i.e. Group IV), then your reading is wrong because it confirms just the opposite. What are these "laws governing oil manufacturing" you're alluding to?
Mobil-1 is a PAO and not a hydrocracked Group III oil like Castrol Syntec. There newest version (Super Syn) also has moly and is producing much better oil analysis reports then it's predecessor Try-Syn. I just don't like their viscosity numbers, very low in the 30 weight range at temperature. Almost into the 20 weight range.
Hey, I had a Rabbit Diesel but never check the oil pressure. HATED that car. But then again I LOVED my '79 Olds Delta 88 Custom Cruise Diesel and most people hated them. It ran forever w/no maintenance, lots of torque, great mpg, and always started no matter how cold it got.
But, back to oil pressure. My Rx7 had a cold idle oil pressure of 130-135. No it wasn't stock.
all good oil filter will withstand the oil pressure that any street engine puts out cold by a factor of 5 or more. the VW diesel rabbit had a 125 PSI cold oil pressure and no stock engine
Lots of good comments so far and I agree with most of them. I think flow rate is just one factor. Good filtration coupled with good flow rate should be the goal here. I'm guessing the Fram keeps a good flow rate because there isn't as much filtration. K&N has proven with its air filters that it can filter better and, with its improved filter media, improve air flow. I would guess the same would be true with its oil filter media. Looking at the results, I'd feel very comfortable using the K&N. The M1 may be using a more resistant media to filter or maybe it does filter better. I'd like to see a test with dirty oil and see which filter removes what and still maintains a good flow rate.
I think I'll stick with K&N until someone can recommend something they believe works as good or better.