When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I hear ya on the weight/price issue, but you usually get what you pay for.. You have to have the weight to have the density required to deaden the sound/vibration. But, I've never smelled tar! I've used dynamat on my last three cars. It is possible that their lower end stuff is of less quality and smells when it get heated.. If I use it, I use the extreme stuff. Its definitely a different compound, its lined with aluminum, and is a better deadener.
Originally Posted by Evil-Twin
too expensive , to heavy, and the reason I crossed this off my test sheet was there are instances of a tar smell from using this product (information found on several sound forums ).. Dynamat is a tar based product.. it will cost over 250 dollars to do the inside and outside of the car.. it will add almost 100 pounds.. and on hot days has been reported to give off a tar smell.. I did not want to correct one problem then add another.. since I was trying to kill two birds with one stone... in reducing tire noise and heat... noting the tunnel area especially near the cats get very warm..
One of the best resources for hardware and industrial supplies is www.macmaster.com , MacMaster-Carr. This is a wonderful place for acoustic materials, and anything else like stainless screen.
When I had the exhuast off I removed the center plate and insulated inside the tunnel, with foam and ceramic tape. Now almost no heat or sound.
I laid a mat of sound insulation foam over the Black wing air filter covering the total area ahead of the Rad, which lowers the engine noise.
You have to have the weight to have the density required to deaden the sound/vibration.
you are correct. 'Cept many here have stock C5's with the factory radio system, that just want to quiet it down a bit, but not add a lot of weight nor dollars. And for them... there are choices.
I hear ya on the weight/price issue, but you usually get what you pay for
keep in mind that this is not a "complaint post". This is a "it worked" post; and people feel they got more than what they paid for using the matrerials ET and I have had good results with. Don't get too caught up in marketing claims... marketing and sales droids can make a pet-rock seem fantastic; when in reality any 'ol rock will do.
Last edited by Mike Mercury; Sep 8, 2004 at 01:13 PM.
I hear ya on the weight/price issue, but you usually get what you pay for.. You have to have the weight to have the density required to deaden the sound/vibration. But, I've never smelled tar! I've used dynamat on my last three cars. It is possible that their lower end stuff is of less quality and smells when it get heated.. If I use it, I use the extreme stuff. Its definitely a different compound, its lined with aluminum, and is a better deadener.
In the three years plus that this tip has been available for forum members.. No one has said it didnt work... There must be hundreds of claim of success using this proceedure.. there are no negatives here.. its not expensive, it attacks the root cause of the noise, by breaking up the harmonics caused by the tire noise being amplified throught the body of the car. it is easily reversable, and it adds little weight... This is the biggest bang for the buck in noise reduction that you can get... I personally spent three months developing this effort.. Tim (Mike Mercury) did a better job of documenting the proceedure. I know I have zero tire noise below 45 mph, and I reduced the tire noise by 50% above 45 mph, which is a dramatic improvement for under 100 dollars and less that 20 lbs.