When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
"Whether she was wearing her seat belt or not, that's irrelevant," Brown said. "In this particular situation, we can't explore the possibilities, we have to explore the evidence, and that's what we're doing - thoroughly investigating what happened in this crash."
Yeah that's exactly what I was saying. Seat belt matters not it's what you do. They believe he was acting wrecklessly based on evidence not his little black box and Seat belts, Air bags etc are pointelss.
I have an idea- what if you placed an explosive device right above that module that will deploy with the airbags- either that or something that can generate a very large EMI field that would destroy the unit when the airbags go off?
On the other hand- I think it is rather unfair that just because you happen to be driving a black box equipped car that is more evidence that can be presented against you. What if you are driving another make/model/year that doesnt have the black box?
But- I have heard that there was a few cases in which the black box data actually worked in favor of the defendant. IE, the police say you were speeding etc and caused the crash when you were actually driving normally.
No legal recourse give your head a shake you live in the United States where people sue each other for funny looks.
If I get injured in an accident when the airbags could of prevented the injury and I found out the owner remove the black box which disables the airbags, damn right I would sue your ***. There is your legal recourse
This aint so funny,,,,Most of England's hiway and main feeder roads are now covered by computer aided camera systems.....WITH license plate readers......
Human ID and tracking implants already exist and are being mandated in some countries for certain Federal employee classes.
You and your cute penguin are scary!! But true....
There's already enough weird stuff going on that 99% of us are blissfully unaware of.
Do a search on "janet airlines". Pretty wild stuff.
Scott
From: You want HOW much for that Corvette part??? Atlanta GA
Originally Posted by Zilla
You should only worry about the black box only if you plan on driving like an ***. The black box can be you worst enemy or your best friend. It can save you when some witness claims you were going 100mph but the black box shows you doing the speed limit.
I'm not advocating the removal of the black box (esp. at the expense of airbag deployment), but one thing I can not stand is the "if you aren’t doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about" mentality that more and more Americans (and the rest of the world) have.. Part of me feels like they don't deserve to live in this country.
To clarify, given a choice of somehow making it impossible for one man to murder another man, vs. allowing that possibility but face extreme penalties for the act, I'll always choose to allow the murder. It's called free will folks. Don’t ever give it up!
Rent (or better yet buy) Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece "A Clockwork Orange" if you don't understand my point of view.
Last edited by Dan_the_C5_Man; Jan 18, 2005 at 11:58 PM.
Evidence gleaned from a car's "black box" -- a computer module that, among other things, records a vehicle's speed in the last five seconds before airbags deploy in a collision -- will be admissible in the New York trial of two men charged with second-degree murder...
As they approached the Muttontown Road [Nassau County, N.Y.] intersection, Soukup, driving a 2002 Chevrolet Corvette at nearly 130 miles per hour, slammed into a 1993 Jeep Cherokee, tearing that vehicle in half.
A split second later, Slade, driving a 2002 Mercedes, rammed into the front end of the Jeep, knocking it 300 yards up the road...
One of the Cherokee's occupants, Sophia Bretous, was dead at the scene. Her companion, Jean Desir, died later that night at the Nassau University Medical Center.
This happened in 2002. Drivers of the 'Vette/Merc were 17/19 @ the time of the crash.
You should only worry about the black box only if you plan on driving like an ***. The black box can be you worst enemy or your best friend. It can save you when some witness claims you were going 100mph but the black box shows you doing the speed limit.
You make the choice
Show me a single Vette driver that has NEVER (key word here is never) gone over the posted (or unposted) speed limit even once... even the safest sports car driver can find a time to safely go over the speed limit.
My company developed the SDM for GM, so if you are really interested in this, let me know and I'll do some research and share what I can (public domain info of course). In the past I have worked with the group that analyzed crash data, as well as the folks that develop the air bag deployment algorithm. I think you have your answer, but if you need more info let me know since I still have connections into the team.
How about telling us which board holds the memory. Then if you have an accident one could just flash it with a ESD. That would fix it. The simple solution is to find a way to flash it on demand.
I don't mean to be argumentative but you MAY disconnect a safety feature on your vehicle if you wish. It is NOT against the law to disable your airbags. However, you must inform your insurance company or you may be committing fraud because most insurance companies offer a small discount for passive restraints. It typically doesn't require a great deal of electrical wizardry to by-pass such systems so that one does not pick up DTC codes and warning lights.
Also, if you live a state that does not perform or require emissions testing then you can remove your cats also. It's not environmentally responsible but neither is driving this car in the first place.
Under some of the arm-chair legal theories expressed in this thread I suppose disconnecting the CAGS is also illegal because it was intended to improve gas mileage in order to avoid "gas guzzler" tax. So, if you eliminated CAGS then you owe the U.S. govt. back "gas guzzler" taxes??? I don't think so.
This happened in 2002. Drivers of the 'Vette/Merc were 17/19 @ the time of the crash.
This is one of the reasons why I would consider removing the box. If you've ever driven on Long Island, you'll know that nobody does the speed limit. The speed limit on the L.I.E is 55, but unless you're doing 75, people are running you off the road. Now picture yourself getting into a accident at 15-20 mph over the limit, a lawyer would have a field day with you in court, meanwhile you were just keeping up with traffic.
...picture yourself getting into a accident at 15-20 mph over the limit, a lawyer would have a field day with you in court, meanwhile you were just keeping up with traffic.
Rather than disable the box, I think the solution would be to get a good lawyer yourself, no?
My company developed the SDM for GM, so if you are really interested in this, let me know and I'll do some research and share what I can (public domain info of course). In the past I have worked with the group that analyzed crash data, as well as the folks that develop the air bag deployment algorithm. I think you have your answer, but if you need more info let me know since I still have connections into the team.
I would appreciate you looking into this if not too much trouble. I understand about the air bag. In my 2003 GMC truck I can turn the air bag off with a key on the dash. I would like to know how to control this information. I would also like to know how to disable OnStar completely since I do not use them.
Who's gonna sue? Me, maybe my wife. I know maybe my partner in our Race team that actually pulled the bags will sue me, or my Dog who somtimes rides shotgun. I'm sure she's got a solid case
My Bags have been out for two years for weight savings on the track. Most of the time I don't even have my passenger seat in. and if I do it's one of the three mentioned in the car.
Don't be so quick to judge something you know little to nothing about.
The point I do not understand here is that in my 2003 GMC truck and I can turn the passenger air bag off with a keyhole in the dash planely marked for that exact purpose. I personally do not want to disconnect the air bags, but I do not want the black box recording anything I do not want it to record.
Taking this thread in a slightly different direction.. is this module the same thing the dealer could pull data from or is that stored somewhere different? I have always heard that they [dealer]could pull up your data such as RPMS and speeds and all that not related to a crash. True or false?
"You should only worry about the black box only if you plan on driving like an ***."
I agree, Zilla.
C'mon, if you are driving on a public roadway in such a way that the "black box" can contribute to your legal woes, then I sure as hell don't want to be on the road at the same time with you! This overworked topic becomes a litmus test for our collective paranoia. If you want to drive at the edge, get to a race track or a sanctioned autocross. I'll stand there and cheer you on!
I'm not advocating the removal of the black box (esp. at the expense of airbag deployment), but one thing I can not stand is the "if you aren’t doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about" mentality that more and more Americans (and the rest of the world) have.. Part of me feels like they don't deserve to live in this country.
To clarify, given a choice of somehow making it impossible for one man to murder another man, vs. allowing that possibility but face extreme penalties for the act, I'll always choose to allow the murder. It's called free will folks. Don’t ever give it up!
Rent (or better yet buy) Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece "A Clockwork Orange" if you don't understand my point of view.
YES Totally agree! What do you think of those airport TSA physical pat down searches? Smells like violation of 4th amendment illegal search in the guise of very weak probable cause.
YES Totally agree! What do you think of those airport TSA physical pat down searches? Smells like violation of 4th amendment illegal search in the guise of very weak probable cause.
Uh oh.. I hope we are still on the same page! I have absolutely no problem w/ "profiling". In fact, it's an essential tool to catch "the bad guys", whomever they may be! If Islamists fly a plane into a building, then you pat down anyone that looks like an Islamist. Political Correctness is another pet peeve of mine. What doesn’t make sense is to let Jihad Jr. slide past the security check, for fear that it might hurt someone’s feelings, while 80 year old white Grandma gets the full cavity search!