When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I saw the GM graph that showed 2% slower 0-60 times for the A6 v. the A4/3.15 but it's not borne out by the math.
I wonder how they derived the graph?
2.56x6L80E = 10.31, 6.05, 3.92, 2.95, 2.18, 1.71
3.15 x4L65E = 9.64, 5.13, 3.15, 2.21
I too wonder where that came from. My guess would be that the A6 requires one more shift in the 0-60 dash. What do you think about that, Sir Doyle's evil one?
I too wonder where that came from. My guess would be that the A6 requires one more shift in the 0-60 dash. What do you think about that, Sir Doyle's evil one?
I'm glad I got an 05 C-6 with 4 spd. auto which is a heavier duty version 4L65LEof a tried and true transmission with 3.15 gears.
LS WON, In an earlier post by someone, they read an excerpt from an article in the Corvette Quarterly "Special Edition" on the "05 C6 Auto." What was said was that the '05 A4 Auto. Trans. in this heavier duty version, was capable of handling up to 620 lbs. ft. of torque. I personally have not read the article, but would like to. Would anyone be able to scan & post the article, or even type out the exact wording from the article?? I think that they said it was on page 120 of the "Special Edition" of the magazine. Thanks much...
Last edited by TRJ; Aug 7, 2005 at 02:19 PM.
Reason: Number correction..
I too wonder where that came from. My guess would be that the A6 requires one more shift in the 0-60 dash. What do you think about that, Sir Doyle's evil one?
more parts,more weight,like a heavier flywheel, in the trans means more rotational mass which equals slower accelertion. that is why a THM 350 is quicker then a THM 400 at the drags. this is the reason that GM did not use a dual mass flywheel in the C-6s to quiet down the "gear rattle" problem found in the C-5 because it would cost .2 in the 0-60 times because of the extra weight
with big Jim the 6 speed tranny is /will be an improvement over the A4,lower ratios out of the hole>>> you guys probably complained when the power glide was done away with in 67/68 for the 3 speed auto>>>..wait a minute you were on big wheels at the time, a 6 speed auto is in my future & if i need a 4 speed to prove im a man i will take my 66 B/B out for a spin my legs are tired but not my thumbs paddle shifters here I come Yahoooo & Woof 2 cents from the old dog>>>> QUOTE=Big Jimm]I think the new tranny is ABSOLUTELY EXCELLENT!!
I like the new low - and high - ratios and think the paddle shift is just right! Having driven MANY stick shifts in the past, I'll bet that, with the operation of this new tranny, stick shift buyers in the future will dwindle fast.
And, that there will be a lot of 05 stick AND auto trade-ins to get the new A6.
Also - 1250 is a VERY fair price! (Unlike the chrome wheels @1995.)
with big Jim the 6 speed tranny is /will be an improvement over the A4,lower ratios out of the hole>>> you guys probably complained when the power glide was done away with in 67/68 for the 3 speed auto>>>..wait a minute you were on big wheels at the time, a 6 speed auto is in my future & if i need a 4 speed to prove im a man i will take my 66 B/B out for a spin my legs are tired but not my thumbs paddle shifters here I come Yahoooo & Woof 2 cents from the old dog>>>> QUOTE=Big Jimm]I think the new tranny is ABSOLUTELY EXCELLENT!!
I like the new low - and high - ratios and think the paddle shift is just right! Having driven MANY stick shifts in the past, I'll bet that, with the operation of this new tranny, stick shift buyers in the future will dwindle fast.
And, that there will be a lot of 05 stick AND auto trade-ins to get the new A6.
Also - 1250 is a VERY fair price! (Unlike the chrome wheels @1995.)
Big Jimm
So. Fla.
[/QUOTE]
I love the presentation. Neato eye candy . But I too wonder why somebody would want less gears in an automatic. Fluid clutch and dynaflow way back when only had 1 gear , and they were terribly slow off the line . 2 speed Powerglide might be great for the dragstrip where the power is awsome, but it was mighty feeble driving down Muholland Road .
more parts,more weight,like a heavier flywheel, in the trans means more rotational mass which equals slower accelertion. that is why a THM 350 is quicker then a THM 400 at the drags. this is the reason that GM did not use a dual mass flywheel in the C-6s to quiet down the "gear rattle" problem found in the C-5 because it would cost .2 in the 0-60 times because of the extra weight
here is the original GM Powertrain announcement of building a 6 speed automatic. It is the reference that made me wait for the actual tranny to be made rather than buying a 2005. The Caddy announcement said that all the shifts above the 1-2 shift were clutch to clutch. I am going to have to research that some more. I added the italics to emphasize the claimed advantages.
Hydra-Matic 6-Speed Automatic TransmissionsDelivering performance and fuel economy benefits
Overview:
Several 6-speed variants will be featured in GM vehicles worldwide.
The first 6-speed will debut in 2005 (applications to be announced at a later date)
New Technologies:
Here is a 2004 GM description of this "advance" to be used in the 6 speed transmission:
CLUTCH-TO-CLUTCH SHIFT CONTROL SYSTEM
This innovation consists of groundbreaking control logic and the hydraulic hardware necessary to control clutch-to-clutch transmissions with world-class shift quality. These methods enable five- and six-speed transmissions to be integrated with various engines and platform combinations with significantly reduced calibration effort. Included is FAST Learn, an algorithm that compensates for initial build variation, allowing the control logic to deliver excellent shift quality right out of the vehicle assembly plant and over the life of the transmission through adaptive learning. The control logic with reduced calibration effort minimizes development cost, time, and improves overall quality.
It makes it sound like the advantages are for manufacturing variations and a way to make the shifts consistent. Does that relate to better performance? Boy I don't know. Performance of course means "faster" to us Y body people.
The DCT is basically two transmissions in one case, one with gears 1, 3, and 5 and one with gears 2, 4, and 6. Clutch-to-clutch shifting enables the transmission to shift under power, eliminating the torque interruption that is characteristic of many automated manual transmission systems. Like an automated manual system, the DCT uses engine control to optimize feel and has both automatic and manual (shifting) operation modes that can be selected at any time.
Benefits of this system include fuel economy as good as or better than a manual, maintaining the feel and function of an automatic, a layshaft configuration that permits flexibility in designing gear ratios for optimum fuel economy and performance of different vehicles, being well-suited to high power engine applications, and being well-suited for integration of electric motors for hybrid applications.
Please bear with me as I'm having computer problems I will look into this.
Originally Posted by TRJ
LS WON, In an earlier post by someone, they read an excerpt from an article in the Corvette Quarterly "Special Edition" on the "05 C6 Auto." What was said was that the '05 A4 Auto. Trans. in this heavier duty version, was capable of handling up to 620 lbs. ft. of torque. I personally have not read the article, but would like to. Would anyone be able to scan & post the article, or even type out the exact wording from the article?? I think that they said it was on page 120 of the "Special Edition" of the magazine. Thanks much...
This special issue of Corvette Quarterly does it come in the mail to the regular subscribers like myself or do you have to purchase frrom a newsstand. In any event do you know what is on the cover of this special edition magazine so that I can identifiy it easier and faster.