Torque Management System - C6
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

agreed, although, there seems to be some consensus that the possibility of it existing in the automatics is greater than of the manuals.
this has been a debated issue several times and there are believers on both sides of the fence, information shared that seems to point one way or the other but there hasn't been any definative proof that documents the workings of torque management on the c6. the closest 'official' documentation i've seen refers to 'traction control' as a form of 'torque management'. other than that, i haven't seen anything that 'spells' it out so that even the most ardent disbeliever is unable to disagree with either it's existance or nonexistance.
there appear to be 'safeguards' built into the computer that will attempt to protect the engine based upon specific readings. is that what can be called torque management, who knows.
for all intensive purposes 'knock' sensors can be considered part of torque management. get knock , timing is pulled, timing is pulled, reduction in power, reduction in power, slower time.
so now that i ran in a circle, yes TM exists in the c6..... what form is it in, who knows.....
this has been a debated issue several times and there are believers on both sides of the fence, information shared that seems to point one way or the other but there hasn't been any definative proof that documents the workings of torque management on the c6. the closest 'official' documentation i've seen refers to 'traction control' as a form of 'torque management'. other than that, i haven't seen anything that 'spells' it out so that even the most ardent disbeliever is unable to disagree with either it's existance or nonexistance.
there appear to be 'safeguards' built into the computer that will attempt to protect the engine based upon specific readings. is that what can be called torque management, who knows.
for all intensive purposes 'knock' sensors can be considered part of torque management. get knock , timing is pulled, timing is pulled, reduction in power, reduction in power, slower time.
so now that i ran in a circle, yes TM exists in the c6..... what form is it in, who knows.....
I think this sums up my opinion. I have no doubt that timing is pulled at certain times, but is that just engine tuning, or is it torque managment? What is Torque Management? If the computer is limiting torque to the factory specs (400lb ft peak), is that a problem? Or is it suddendly deciding that 300 lb ft would be a better number, so it pulls timing and throttle opening to the "C4" mode.
The only two people who are credible (in my opinion) who have given objective data indicating that what I would consider true TM have related it to running drag radials or street et's at the drag strip. In those cases, it appears that significant timing was pulled. I can understand that. Stresses are being put on the drivetrain that would not be seen with true street tires, and the stresses are sending signals to the ECU to reduce power in order to reduce the chance of breaking something.
I think this sums up my opinion. I have no doubt that timing is pulled at certain times, but is that just engine tuning, or is it torque managment? What is Torque Management? If the computer is limiting torque to the factory specs (400lb ft peak), is that a problem? Or is it suddendly deciding that 300 lb ft would be a better number, so it pulls timing and throttle opening to the "C4" mode.
The only two people who are credible (in my opinion) who have given objective data indicating that what I would consider true TM have related it to running drag radials or street et's at the drag strip. In those cases, it appears that significant timing was pulled. I can understand that. Stresses are being put on the drivetrain that would not be seen with true street tires, and the stresses are sending signals to the ECU to reduce power in order to reduce the chance of breaking something.
Last edited by jimman; Jul 2, 2006 at 11:36 AM.
Last edited by bunk22; Jul 2, 2006 at 12:10 PM.
The stock C6Z has about 90 more rwhp than the stock C5Z. But the C6Z is slower to 60' and no faster to 330' at the drag strip. Ridiculous. Shouldn't happen. The reason is that power is pulled on the C6Z by Torque Management to protect the drive train. The C6Z is not spinning the tires; it simply WILL NOT make a strong launch. And even on DR there is some bog on the 1-2 and 2-3. This occurs in TC-Off and Comp Driving Modes. I've not (and will not) tried All-Off.
Now, when TM releases the power, the C6Z takes off noticeably stronger than a C5Z. In fact, from 330'-1320' (which is all 3d and 4th gears), the C6Z registers about 6.31-6.40 seconds compared to 6.70-6.80 for the C5Z. That's more like it. Those are my times.
I suspect that I could install a fresh ECU, stock except with TM edited out, and drop 3 tenth from my quarter mile ET both on stock tires and drag radials. I might do that this Fall, if I can resolve one particular concern....
The question is whether that change would increase the likelihood of breaking the right axle shaft CV joint housing cover that is the established weak link in the C6Z drive train.
Ranger
Last edited by Ranger; Jul 2, 2006 at 12:52 PM.
Am I a dissatisfied C6 A6 owner with a 14 sec/105mph best making things up? Hardly, my 'vette drove itself to only .45 mph behind top # . Only two others on stock list clearly et quicker, 4 of us door to door and have yet to make a winter pass. That should dispel that.
Who do I believe? Both the jschindler and Joe G. camps. And what I see at the track. Why?...
Thank you for not bringing a Dyno to this thread.
Last edited by Two-Lane Blacktop; Jul 2, 2006 at 03:07 PM.
The stock C6Z has about 90 more rwhp than the stock C5Z. But the C6Z is slower to 60' and no faster to 330' at the drag strip. Ridiculous. Shouldn't happen. The reason is that power is pulled on the C6Z by Torque Management to protect the drive train. The C6Z is not spinning the tires; it simply WILL NOT make a strong launch. And even on DR there is some bog on the 1-2 and 2-3. This occurs in TC-Off and Comp Driving Modes. I've not (and will not) tried All-Off.
Now, when TM releases the power, the C6Z takes off noticeably stronger than a C5Z. In fact, from 330'-1320' (which is all 3d and 4th gears), the C6Z registers about 6.31-6.40 seconds compared to 6.70-6.80 for the C5Z. That's more like it. Those are my times.
I suspect that I could install a fresh ECU, stock except with TM edited out, and drop 3 tenth from my quarter mile ET both on stock tires and drag radials. I might do that this Fall, if I can resolve one particular concern....
The question is whether that change would increase the likelihood of breaking the right axle shaft CV joint housing cover that is the established weak link in the C6Z drive train.
Ranger














