When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey guys still learning and I have a kinda dumb question. I keep reading about the C6 and it reads 400 HP with 400 pound feet of torque but I see posts of 394 RWHP, 376 TQ after dyno from their C6 after mods.
I'm a little confused doesnt it suppose to be higher at RWHP.
What do you guys consider power from the car? BAsed on the HP or the RWHP or TQ!?
Hey guys still learning and I have a kinda dumb question. I keep reading about the C6 and it reads 400 HP with 400 pound feet of torque but I see posts of 394 RWHP, 376 TQ after dyno from their C6 after mods.
I'm a little confused doesnt it suppose to be higher at RWHP.
What do you guys consider power from the car? BAsed on the HP or the RWHP or TQ!?
Please explain? Thanks Guys
Power losses through the driveline result in numbers lower than the 400/400. 400bhp/400ft lbs of torque generated at the crank won't end up being the same amount after the energy expended by turning all the gearing and such in the transmission, the differential and then finally the wheels.
I hate this "rule" but it is said that driveline losses for manuals amount to 15% and for automatics 20%. Thus a bone stock manual C6 should dyno with 340 RWHP or thereabouts.
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Jan 27, 2007 at 09:26 PM.
The factory reading's are the engine numbers. You lose power and torque going through the transmission, differential, driveshaft, half shafts, wheels, rotors and tires.
The factories all rate their #s at flywheel HP + TQ. The rear wheel figures account for parasitic drivetrain and acces. losses, so the numbers are always lower. Around 15%.
The factories all rate their #s at flywheel HP + TQ. The rear wheel figures account for parasitic drivetrain and acces. losses, so the numbers are always lower. Around 15%.
And the different numbers are arrived at by factory figures being taken at the flywheel. Then the cars are put on a dyno after the mods and you get dyno numbers from the rear wheels i.e. rwhp as compared to flywheel hp.
I hope thats clearer.
So is it RWHP that you want to increase in order to gain power or is it the TORQUE?
Horsepower is a measurement unit of power. Ft-lbs is a measurement unit of torque, which is twisting force which translates to seat-of-the pants accelleration feel. You can measure either HP or torque at the crankshaft (engine) or after it goes throught the driveline out to the wheels. Friction losses through all those driveline bearings, gear meshes, oil heating, etc., reduce RWHP from what you'd measure at the crank.
Here's the key: power is simply torque times engine speed (you can't just multiply HP x rpm because the units don't work out right; there's a units correction factor in there. Google HP and torque definitions and you'll get the correct equation if you're that interested).
In other words, torque is what pushes you back in the seat; the faster your engine is spinning while it's making good torque means you can hold a gear longer (and shazam, you're making more power). Hope that's not too much more info than you wanted
St. Jude Donor '06-'08-'10-'11-'12-'13 '14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19
I have always stuck with the idea that HP determines your top speed and torque determines how fast you will get to that top speed. Somewhat simplified but it works. Hope that helps.
You will get as many definitions of torque and hp as there are members on this forum.
Au_n_egl has it correct. The hp at any given rpm is calculated from the torque at that rpm.
A good layman's definition of hp is in the example of applying 100lbs of torque on a lugnut with a long wrench. That can be done with relative ease if the wrench is long enough. The hp comes in when you try to apply that torque while the wheel is unsecured. In other words, it takes hp to apply 100 lbs of torque on a wheel that's spinninng. As you can imagine, you would run out of hp very fast.
Aren't all car manufacturers supposed to go by the same specs and at rear wheels now?
The SAE now requires engines to be measured with all the accessories attached including alternators, power steering pumps, exhaust manifolds, etc. These power tests are done with the engine out of car and bolted directly to a dyno, because often times the same engine will be used in a few different models. So therefore we get flywheel hp for an engine not a car. It's not practical to yank the motors out of cars to test the power after we make modifications, so we have dynos that measure the power at the rear wheels which then demostrate the powertrain losses.
I have always stuck with the idea that HP determines your top speed and torque determines how fast you will get to that top speed. Somewhat simplified but it works. Hope that helps.
Nope, HP determines most everything. Check this 1/4 mile ET/MPH calculator: http://www.race-cars.net/calculators/et_calculator.html
It uses the weight and HP of the car only. The first law of Thermodynamics states energy/power can neither be destroyed or created, you can only change it's shape or form. A gallon of gas has a certain amount of energy. When introduced into an engine, that energy is changed to heat going to the coolant, heat going out the exhaust, noise (yes, noise has energy as well as light), heat to friction, and turning the wheels to propel the car. However, the sum of all the different flow paths must add up to the energy in the gallon of gas we started with. Torque is a force that can be multiplied/divided, which is exactly what the transmission/differential does. In short, you can make whatever amount of torque you want with gears, but if you have 505 HP, you'll always have 505 HP...no more and no less (excludes mods...just had to add that disclaimer ). AU N EGL gave the best link to understand the difference between torque and HP, understand that link and the rest is a piece of cake.