When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Just ran another SuperCharged 560 Corvette at Lebanon Valley Dragway.
This time, a convertible with auto trans.
We only got three runs in at a very crowded Wednesday night session. Results of the third pass: 11.582 sec @ 122.78 mph.
Car Details:
2006 Convertible w/6 speed auto trans.
Callaway SuperCharged Package
Stock LS2, prototype Honker/Magna Charger intake/Double-D exhaust.
Stock exhaust manifolds and catalytic converters.
Callaway PCM recalibration.
Drag radials.
The time slip:
Why do you think your 60's are so slow??
Mine is also on my A6. 1.8's is C5 territory.
These A6 tranny's should be faster off the line.
Last edited by shurite44; Oct 2, 2006 at 07:48 PM.
If I were him, I'd worry about the 2nd part of the track, his half track times are really strong, that should be running lower than 11.5's with his half track time/trap....
Good point, I hit a 1.88 in my bone stock A6, a tuned supercharged one should easily be able to see the 1.7s even on street tires, nevermind DRs. Track prep must've been pretty damn weak or something.
Suggest you manage your coolant temps to launch at no higher than 195. If you do that, all other things being the same, you will shed 1-3 tenths. That is because stock ECU/PCM retards progressive amounts of timing as the coolant temp climbs. Same is true for the air inlet temp. If the car has been idling and the Cats are quite hot, the ECU/PCM will add fuel (eriching the air/fuel) to protect the cats.
So at 218F coolant temp you may have been hit with triple whammy.
There are guys here who assert that engine temps have no ill-effect on their ETs. I'd suggest they are keeping a detailed log book, or else they wouldn't say that.
Is there something wrong with my car? I have 1500 miles on it! This was my best run of the night! I used to pull 13.0's with my 00 Z28!
My c6 was dismally slow stock too for a car that supposedly has 400 hp. Buy looking above at the list, considering our heat down here (probably about 3000 da last night) that is about right.
I can't help you launch a A6, but here is an opportunity to practice and get it down. My first Test Day, along with Ranger's threads, dropped my et by about .4 with my C5, all in learning how to launch (as per my spreadsheet I now keep).
Just an additional point, by managing engine temps, I can still run with a 190 coolant temp and cool cats when the air temp is mid-high 80s and the DA is 2500+ feet. The DA will affect power but not nearly as much as seeing 12-14 degrees of timing pulled by the ECU/PCM at high engine temps.
I'm sure it's a ignorant question, but what does DA stand for?
Far from ignorant. Pilots and drag racers want to know about Density altitude. Pilot need it to calculate max load of their aircraft at take-off.
For racers, DA is a measure of how well the air will produce horsepower. The lower the number the better. DA is computed in a formula using the following variables:
(1) air temperature
(2) humidity
(3) air pressure
To be relatively indicative, those variable should be measured at the track not on a radio report from a nearby city or on the www by Accu-weather. Racers often use a hand-held weather station to automatically compute the density altitude at race time.
I'll add the following bit of info regarding heatsoak. 1st time at the track with the 05 GTO, hot lapping resulted in 102mph traps and mid-high 13's. I was DISMAYED at a 400hp car trapping 102, especially with the air in the 50's. 2nd time at the track with 45min cooldown 105 trap, a 2 hr cooldown and then the 1st person in staging lanes (nearly no idle time) 107mph trap, all with air temp in the mid 80's.
The stock tune GM gave the LS2 is a joke.
The LS2 will lose an easy 40+hp due to running hot.
To be relatively indicative, those variable should be measured at the track not on a radio report from a nearby city or on the www by Accu-weather. Racers often use a hand-held weather station to automatically compute the density altitude at race time.
Speaking of DA, I found a neat link the other day which converts the weather data into DA, and also corrects your ET to standard weather conditions too:
Far from ignorant. Pilots and drag racers want to know about Density altitude. Pilot need it to calculate max load of their aircraft at take-off.
For racers, DA is a measure of how well the air will produce horsepower. The lower the number the better. DA is computed in a formula using the following variables:
(1) air temperature
(2) humidity
(3) air pressure
Don't forget one of the more important factors in calculating DA:
Don't forget one of the more important factors in calculating DA:
Alititude
Not to be picky but he said variables. Track elev would be a constant. Of course like many math equations track elev could become a variable if you go to a different track.
Not to be picky but he said variables. Track elev would be a constant. Of course like many math equations track elev could become a variable if you go to a different track.
I have to politely disagree. The altitude or elevation of the track is one of the variables that is plugged into the equation to determine density altitude. Without that variable you can not determine the DA. Think of it this way, it's only a variable because all the racetracks are at different (variable) altitudes.
I have to politely disagree. The altitude or elevation of the track is one of the variables that is plugged into the equation to determine density altitude. Without that variable you can not determine the DA. Think of it this way, it's only a variable because all the racetracks are at different (variable) altitudes.
True, but I think what Ranger was trying to say (and maybe why physical track altitude was omitted from his list of variables) was that the only way to determine a true DA reading is while you're actually at your particular track using a properly functioning and accurate handheld weather station. The reading will have already factored the physical altitude into it so it might seem redundant to mention it as a variable at that point (though in reality it is of course).
And it's not enough to just have the weather station at the track in or on top of your car but one should actually be holding it near or right at ground level when you read it.
True, but I think what Ranger was trying to say (and maybe why physical track altitude was omitted from his list of variables) was that the only way to determine a true DA reading is while you're actually at your particular track using a properly functioning and accurate handheld weather station. The reading will have already factored the physical altitude into it so it might seem redundant to mention it as a variable at that point (though in reality it is of course).
And it's not enough to just have the weather station at the track in or on top of your car but one should actually be holding it near or right at ground level when you read it.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.