When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Greater Detroit Metro MI, when I'm not travelling.
As long as you keep the overall tire diameter the same you can run whatever size wheels you want. The staggered wheel size is for looks only. The staggered tire size was a design decision, but once it was taken it affects a lot of different factors like rake, traction control, active handling, etc, so that you must keep.
I run 18s all around: 265/35R18 front, 305/35R18 rear. Works great.
The car's Active Handling and ABS is set up to expect about a 1 inch difference in overall tire diameter between front and rear.
If you change tire sizes and do not maintain this difference in diameter, the car reads the rotational speeds of each of the tires (from the sensors in each wheel hub), sees numbers it thinks shouldn't be happening under normal conditions, and concludes that your tires have lost traction. This will activate either AH or ABS at inappropriate times, and may cause loss of control.
Change wheel sizes all you want - just make sure to choose TIRE sizes so that you have about a 1 inch difference in height between front and rear (rear being taller, of course).
The staggered size results in several things:
1) the larger diameter tires in the rear help with traction (both diameter and width....plus
2) more weight on the rear, thus moving the CG slightly to the rear......coming closer to the 50-50 weight distribution.
The staggered size results in several things:
1) the larger diameter tires in the rear help with traction (both diameter and width....plus
Bigger diameter does not help with traction, especially for straight line traction. 18" wheels offer plenty of performance.
2) more weight on the rear, thus moving the CG slightly to the rear......coming closer to the 50-50 weight distribution.
I doubt that the corvette engineers added mass to the rear wheels to improve the weight distribution. Extra rotating mass just makes the car slower to accelerate.
Bigger diameter does not help with traction, especially for straight line traction. 18" wheels offer plenty of performance.
I doubt that the corvette engineers added mass to the rear wheels to improve the weight distribution. Extra rotating mass just makes the car slower to accelerate.
Your 2nd statement actually contradicts your first. I'm not sure if he meant the width aided more than the diameter, but like you said it would help with traction because it'd "eat up" some of the power. haha fwiw I don't think it's why either tho.
The car's Active Handling and ABS is set up to expect about a 1 inch difference in overall tire diameter between front and rear.
If you change tire sizes and do not maintain this difference in diameter, the car reads the rotational speeds of each of the tires (from the sensors in each wheel hub), sees numbers it thinks shouldn't be happening under normal conditions, and concludes that your tires have lost traction. This will activate either AH or ABS at inappropriate times, and may cause loss of control.
Change wheel sizes all you want - just make sure to choose TIRE sizes so that you have about a 1 inch difference in height between front and rear (rear being taller, of course).
Cheers,
Kent
Yup. I run 18s all around. 295s in front and 335s in the rear. No issues at all. About one inch difference between the fronts and rears I run (Toyo R888s).
Bigger diameter does not help with traction, especially for straight line traction. 18" wheels offer plenty of performance.
I doubt that the corvette engineers added mass to the rear wheels to improve the weight distribution. Extra rotating mass just makes the car slower to accelerate.
You can have your opinion ........ which you didn't conclude why then!
Traction has something to do with "foot-print" (as well as many other things including compounds, body/suspension/tire dynamics, etc), which is greater with the larger diameter tire (plus width of course).
They make such a big deal out of weight distribution .... why do you doubt they wouldn't take advantage of both features.
As far as the extra rotating mass .... these things have more power than is needed for acceration ..... thus not the issue here.
You can have your opinion ........ which you didn't conclude why then!
Traction has something to do with "foot-print" (as well as many other things including compounds, body/suspension/tire dynamics, etc), which is greater with the larger diameter tire (plus width of course).
They make such a big deal out of weight distribution .... why do you doubt they wouldn't take advantage of both features.
As far as the extra rotating mass .... these things have more power than is needed for acceration ..... thus not the issue here.
Comments???
Sure. Rotational mass is bad for accelleration, decelleration and handling. Always run the smallest wheels that will clear your brakes and allow you to run the widest tires you'll need. You'll also find greater tire selection choices with 18" tires. The diameter has nothing to do with the "footprint" (width). This isn't complicated.
Because a tire is flexible the contact patch is a square or rectangle, not simply a straight line across the tread. Therefore, increasing diameter DOES increase the contact patch, although minimally.
Because a tire is flexible the contact patch is a square or rectangle, not simply a straight line across the tread. Therefore, increasing diameter DOES increase the contact patch, although minimally.
The difference isn't worth talking about. The increased wheel and tire weight far outweighs any tiny increase, if there even is any. The added rotational weight is in the worst possible location, furthest away from the center of rotation. Check the track forum and see how many run 19s in the rear.
From: Greater Detroit Metro MI, when I'm not travelling.
Originally Posted by MachAll 2005
You can have your opinion ........ which you didn't conclude why then!
Traction has something to do with "foot-print" (as well as many other things including compounds, body/suspension/tire dynamics, etc), which is greater with the larger diameter tire (plus width of course).
They make such a big deal out of weight distribution .... why do you doubt they wouldn't take advantage of both features.
As far as the extra rotating mass .... these things have more power than is needed for acceration ..... thus not the issue here.
Comments???
Yes; That is a ridiculous theory. Corvettes have more power than what is needed for acceleration if you believe a 12 second quarter miles is "fast". The heavier wheels make the car slower to accelerate, slower to brake, and slower to turn. There is ZERO performance advantage to it.
The reason GM went with 19s on the back is for one reason and one reason only: for looks. It had nothing to do with performance.
Yes; That is a ridiculous theory. Corvettes have more power than what is needed for acceleration if you believe a 12 second quarter miles is "fast". The heavier wheels make the car slower to accelerate, slower to brake, and slower to turn. There is ZERO performance advantage to it.
The reason GM went with 19s on the back is for one reason and one reason only: for looks. It had nothing to do with performance.
Fact or just opinion? .... Let's see the engineering data! IF some of the thoughts posted here are factual, then the Corvette engineers got it all wrong .... we should have wide 13 or 14" tires. I'm surprised that the biggest MODs are less diameter tires!
Please note the larger rear tires weigh 7 lbs more each plus the wheel is another 2 lbs for total of 18 lbs biased to the rear of the car........don't think the GM guys thought of this in their final design strategy as well as the impact of the lighter carbon fiber front fenders.
I for one can't "see" the one inch difference in diameter when I look at the car.
Last edited by MachAll 2005; Sep 22, 2009 at 11:00 PM.
Fact or just opinion? .... Let's see the engineering data! IF some of the thoughts posted here are factual, then the Corvette engineers got it all wrong .... we should have wide 13 or 14" tires. I'm surprised that the biggest MODs are less diameter tires!
Please note the larger rear tires weigh 7 lbs more each plus the wheel is another 2 lbs for total of 18 lbs biased to the rear of the car........don't think the GM guys thought of this in their final design strategy as well as the impact of the lighter carbon fiber front fenders.
I for one can't "see" the one inch difference in diameter when I look at the car.
All things being equal the 18s outperfom the 19s. I went from 18X8.5/19X10 stock wheels with 245s and 285s to 18X10.5/18X13 with 295s and 335s and saved weight. That's five sizes larger front and rear and still lighter.
Performance
Large diameter wheels/tires
I know which one I'll stick with.
If you bought your Corvette to look cool, great. I expect it to perform as well as it looks.
From: Greater Detroit Metro MI, when I'm not travelling.
Originally Posted by MachAll 2005
Fact or just opinion? .... Let's see the engineering data! IF some of the thoughts posted here are factual, then the Corvette engineers got it all wrong .... we should have wide 13 or 14" tires. I'm surprised that the biggest MODs are less diameter tires!
No, it should have whees large enough to accomodate its brakes, and no larger. That is how race cars are designed. Incidentally, you may be interested to learn that the Corvette race cars, last generation's C5R and the C6R, both run 18s front and back.
This is not an opinion. If you need me to explain to you why a larger rear wheel is not a performance advantage and why it would be ridiculous to put one on the back to "try and balance out the weight from the front of the car" I am not going to do that.
All things being equal the 18s outperfom the 19s. I went from 18X8.5/19X10 stock wheels with 245s and 285s to 18X10.5/18X13 with 295s and 335s and saved weight. That's five sizes larger front and rear and still lighter.
Performance
Large diameter wheels/tires
I know which one I'll stick with.
If you bought your Corvette to look cool, great. I expect it to perform as well as it looks.
San
Lol I like your style , is your car lowered and is it on stock fenders? so I gather that There's no need for z06 fenders to achieve larger tires , I just need to drop to 18"s ! And to think I just spent 1 hr researching wide body kits , thank you sir
Smaller wheel diameter will perform better when comparing 18" against 19+" wheels, but it is a true statement that a larger TIRE (not wheel) diameter does increase the contact patch. This also gives a taller tire sidewall allowing more straight line flex during hard throttle transitions.
The 19" wheel does not add anything to the performance, and just adds weight.
As long as you keep the overall tire diameter the same you can run whatever size wheels you want. The staggered wheel size is for looks only. The staggered tire size was a design decision, but once it was taken it affects a lot of different factors like rake, traction control, active handling, etc, so that you must keep.
I run 18s all around: 265/35R18 front, 305/35R18 rear. Works great.
What are the tire heights in inches front & rear? I forgot the brand & the specific tires you'r running. Would you mind giving me that as well?