When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I don't know anything about engine like most of you, but all I know is that I did CNC LS3 heads, cam and intake along with headers at got 508 at the wheels
I might have seen 12-18 PEAK hp on my stock LS2, they generally carry more HP than that though under the curve...I haven't seen anything as high as 7 hp on a LS3 version though...
That's also true about 7 on the LS3.
I'm still amazed an LS2 only picked up 12 peak hp on a vehicle. You've obviously seen more cars than me with it, but I've always seen over 15 on all the cars I know of that had it. There are always those that deviate though.
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13
Originally Posted by FloydSummerOf68
That's also true about 7 on the LS3.
I'm still amazed an LS2 only picked up 12 peak hp on a vehicle. You've obviously seen more cars than me with it, but I've always seen over 15 on all the cars I know of that had it. There are always those that deviate though.
On a stock LS2 with just bolt on's yeah most of the time at PEAK I might only see a 8-12 gain, but if you look across the board they may pickup as much as 20 hp 2000-5000 RPM under the curve. Same thing with torque, they pick up so much under the curve, more than what the PEAK numbers will tell.
I realize that the ls3 is a slightly larger displacement motor,but what are the real differances in them? What is it that they have that makes 30 more hp stock? heads and intake? Longer stroke? Just curious...they seems to make real good power when modded.
DUH..... I have not seen this mentioned yet PROBABLY because they are changed as almost first is..... I believe the stock air intake on the LS3 is of a better design than the LS2 stocker which also add's to the initial stock deltas.
Several others have answered the real engine deltas - above is slight relative to the other comments!
To me - a huge diff in the LS3 platform is the Manual Tranny and improved linkage vs the LS2 manual.
Agree with Steve - good info here!
Last edited by gsx1300r; Oct 14, 2011 at 11:27 AM.
AFR 230's are WAY to big for a stock displacement LS2 or LS3. Done back to back before on 402 engines with the G6X3 and I have made more with the smaller heads on it, not only HP but TQ as well.
The AFR 205 is now a 210?
Even Tony Mamo himself said the 230's dont make the low end TQ of the smaller head. Also, Tony recommended the 230 V2 to Patrick G and prepped the heads and FAST for that car.
Damn Spin--I don't have the LG cam but I feel like the TF 235s will be my next major mod.
If you don't mind, what is the reason for requiring the G6 cam? For comparison's sake to an already existing chart/graph you have?
Because the fastest cars on the 1/4 mile challenge are LS2s with the G6 cam and trick flow 225's. It follows that the TF 225s or TF 235s with the same cam on a bigger displacement will be great results. I'd actually like to see a TF 225 result first. Since those cars are approaching 530rwhp wth 3.90 gears on one and 4.10's on the other I know of (he ran a 28" tall tire for the trap speed and driveline protection with the tall sidewall), it stands to reason that the bigger displacement will be just like the LS3 heads on the two engines seeing about 15rwhp difference. 540rwhp? Go over to LS1tech and check out the results guys see with 416's. 480-520?....for a stroker?
If you put on TF heads with a smaller cam, lots of tuners pushing Ls3 ported castings will be yapping like that its a typical result if it only makes 505-510 ect. Its only a matter of time. I just dont get why everyone in the c5 days got 6000 dollar h/c packages and now everyone goes cam only with maybe porting the stock Ls3 heads.
If I saw a guy run 10.55 with trick flow heads, I know what I'd be getting if I was staying N/A on an LS3.
I don't know about that. 12rwhp for a FAST intake? I don't think I've ever seen an LS2 show so little with one.
12rwhp is a stock FAST and 20+ is a ported one (at peak). I prepped enough of them stock and ported all for the same car with dyno's before and after to come up with the results I see all the time. I've ported well into the three digits worth of FASTs and they dont do 20rwhp stock unless we are talking area under the curve. I was quoting peak HP numbers since I was responding to a guy who said just that in this thread.
Keep in mind you need to supply the cores that are about 500 for a set. 800 for labor plus options like valves and springs. They also offer valve guide upgrades. This is their smaller head. A full race version is also on that site. So 500+800+ springs (500), valves and you also need an intake manifold. Its 2000 that route.
The most I've ever seen on a ported LS3 head on a 6 liter is 482rwhp. This is a dynojet result. I've seen claims of 508 on non-dyno-jets.
The heads that look the most promising to me if you arent getting a CNC name brand head is Charlie at RPM who does his work in house and he has smalll bore LS7 heads for smaller engine displacements. Charlie is very meticulous.
Keep in mind heads like TF225s and AFRs have 80% resale value. You arent ever going to see that on a ported stock casting. Ive seen 2400 dollar new TFs go for 2k used.
Trick Flow also has an as cast version that is under 2000 that you can send to TEA later which will be state of the art when done. I'd go that route with 1600-1800 up front and be able to have the best later.
Last edited by SpinMonster; Oct 16, 2011 at 12:41 PM.
I have a H/C LS2 making in the 480-90rwhp range. I asked a tuner about swapping the ported LS2 heads with a set of TFs because of all the great dyno results I've been seeing with them. They said it's probably not worth it for me. I have a relatively small cam, 228/228, I think? I don't have any of the info available right now. So I'm not sure if it "not being worth it" has to do with my current cam or the power-to-money ratio of swapping heads. I also looked into swapping out the ported FAST 90 and 90 TB to a ported 102/102. I was told the gains wouldn't be worth it there either.
I guess I was just looking for another project without going FI or stroker.
Thanks not to say you can't have forced induction on a road course car. It just needs to be more sorted out. Cooling system, keeping IAT's down under long periods of boost, oil cooling, etc.
I just bought an ls3 (stock) and have TF 225's on my old engine. I was thinking about selling them to offset some of the cost of the ls3. I was wondering what would the power gains be reusing the 225's? I don't drag race, and in the roadcurse racing scene power isn't as important as driving skill is.
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13
Originally Posted by SpinMonster
The AFR 205 is now a 210?
Even Tony Mamo himself said the 230's dont make the low end TQ of the smaller head. Also, Tony recommended the 230 V2 to Patrick G and prepped the heads and FAST for that car.
Yes the 205 became the 210, I just have a lot more data from the older 205 and 225 heads vs the 210 and 230's.