ls2 vs. ls3 hp? why?






The tune isnt better on the LS3, its optimized to use 8 more degrees timing between 3 and 4k RPMs where the LS3 heads are inefficient. You wouldnt make more power using an LS3 tune on an LS2.
Trick Flow 225s on the LS2 make 520-530rwhp where the LS3 cam only makes about 500rwhp with the same cam. Trick Flow 235s on the LS3 would be the same 15rwhp higher at 535-540rwhp. Its just a better head but people keep trying to port the LS3 head instead of taking the cue from the LS2 cars that make more power. Tuners makes more money porting the LS3 castings for you where Trick Flow gets it if you go with the better head.


The tune isnt better on the LS3, its optimized to use 8 more degrees timing between 3 and 4k RPMs where the LS3 heads are inefficient. You wouldnt make more power using an LS3 tune on an LS2.
Trick Flow 225s on the LS2 make 520-530rwhp where the LS3 cam only makes about 500rwhp with the same cam. Trick Flow 235s on the LS3 would be the same 15rwhp higher at 535-540rwhp. Its just a better head but people keep trying to port the LS3 head instead of taking the cue from the LS2 cars that make more power. Tuners makes more money porting the LS3 castings for you where Trick Flow gets it if you go with the better head.
The tune isnt better on the LS3, its optimized to use 8 more degrees timing between 3 and 4k RPMs where the LS3 heads are inefficient. You wouldnt make more power using an LS3 tune on an LS2.
Trick Flow 225s on the LS2 make 520-530rwhp where the LS3 cam only makes about 500rwhp with the same cam. Trick Flow 235s on the LS3 would be the same 15rwhp higher at 535-540rwhp. Its just a better head but people keep trying to port the LS3 head instead of taking the cue from the LS2 cars that make more power. Tuners makes more money porting the LS3 castings for you where Trick Flow gets it if you go with the better head.
You don't think the intake helps a lot as well?
The LS2 picks up LOADS of power going to the FAST 102 while the LS3 picks up very little.
The LS3 is superior to the LS2 in stock form. Once you mod, the LS2 catches up and they are about even. I think this is due to intake/exhaust restriction on the LS2. (heads are a big part of this.) The above answered the technical questions.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The tune isnt better on the LS3, its optimized to use 8 more degrees timing between 3 and 4k RPMs where the LS3 heads are inefficient. You wouldnt make more power using an LS3 tune on an LS2.
Trick Flow 225s on the LS2 make 520-530rwhp where the LS3 cam only makes about 500rwhp with the same cam. Trick Flow 235s on the LS3 would be the same 15rwhp higher at 535-540rwhp. Its just a better head but people keep trying to port the LS3 head instead of taking the cue from the LS2 cars that make more power. Tuners makes more money porting the LS3 castings for you where Trick Flow gets it if you go with the better head.
Last edited by danieloneil01; Oct 12, 2011 at 02:48 AM.





http://corvetteactioncenter.com/spec...ls3_page1.html




I just tuned ADV Induction's ported heads on a 416 and it didnt even match box stock LS3 head numbers. Porting LS3 heads isnt the way to go. I will be retuning that same car with stock LS3 heads in a few weeks so we will see the exact same car with only the head swap for data.
Thanks for making data available.
Porting it does nothiing but slow it down more. A Trick Flow 235 stomps that from a much smaller runner. So if two heads flow the same, the smaller runner size makes more power.
The 4" bore limits the size head from Trick flow that you can use. The Trick Flow 225 is for a 4" bore and a 235 needs to be on a 4.03" bore or bigger.
The LS3 is superior to the LS2 in stock form. Once you mod, the LS2 catches up and they are about even. I think this is due to intake/exhaust restriction on the LS2. (heads are a big part of this.) The above answered the technical questions.
I've put it out there before: I will install for FREE Trick Flow 235s on a H/C LS3 and dyno it on 2 local dynojets. The cam must be the G6X3.


If you don't mind, what is the reason for requiring the G6 cam? For comparison's sake to an already existing chart/graph you have?
.....Until someone tries a Trick Flow 235 on the LS3. I have many PMs from owners of the AFR 230 who werent happy with the results while we have seen near 530rwhp with the TF 225. Until H/C LS3s use some other heads we dont have a lot of data on how the competition stacks up against AFR or ported LS3 heads. So far we see the 1/4 mile challenge owned by trick flow on the LS2. Why no one thinks the LS3 w/TFs would be just as good a performer is beyond me.
AFR 230's are WAY to big for a stock displacement LS2 or LS3. Done back to back before on 402 engines with the G6X3 and I have made more with the smaller heads on it, not only HP but TQ as well.










