When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I really doubt that a dual throttle intake plenum would fit under a Corvette Hood. Never mind that it's way too much air for a typical street car horsepower level.
Well, Edelbrock says they will fit, but I guess that has yet to be seen since theirs is not released yet either.. I wouldn't be putting it in a vette tho anyway
Last edited by ChevyChad; Jul 14, 2016 at 06:58 AM.
I already have two air tubes that come down from my roof scoop feeding a box where my filter currently is. I just think that by having dual TBs in my case would be aesthetically pleasing if for no other reason. Plus, maybe one day when I get the budget to go crazy with twin turbos, it would already be ideal for that as well.
Well, Edelbrock says they will fit, but I guess that has yet to be seen since theirs is not released yet either.. I wouldn't be putting it in a vette tho anyway
Those are such cool cars but my wife would divorce me if I tried to spend the next 2 years in the garage. Maybe some day.
Could run one tube that splits into two, put MAF in area that's still one tube......
One tube that feeds 2 throttle-bodies?
Hell.....what's the point in that, unless you flip for an over-sized tube and splitter that'll split under the hood?
Then.....SD conversion, specialized tuning program and a tuning who's figured out the program, plus an additional TB.
IMO, Edelbrock should be engineering and offering the SD conversion, the tune program, and the additional hardware (for single tube splitting into two). And all that costs additional cheese.....not to mention some interesting fitment issues.
I can't see the Edelbrock intake being worth the hassle .....
KW
Last edited by KW Baraka; Jul 16, 2016 at 01:59 PM.
Hell.....what's the point in that, unless you flip for an over-sized tube and splitter that'll split under the hood?
Then.....SD conversion, specialized tuning program and a tuning who's figured out the program, plus an additional TB.
IMO, Edelbrock should be engineering and offering the SD conversion, the tune program, and the additional hardware (for single tube splitting into two). And all that costs additional cheese.....not to mention some interesting fitment issues.
I can't see the Edelbrock intake being worth the hassle .....
KW
No "specialized" tuning program required. It'd be the same as tuning anything else. My concern would just be whether the TB's can consistently close as far as they'd have to to idle consistently with air coming in through two of them..
.........As for offering tuning/etc for a race car part, ahahahahaahhahahahahahahaah.
Exactly. And the lack of tuning assistance/program from Edelbrock leaves the customer/tuner to figure things out. Again.....more trouble than it's worth.
Originally Posted by schpenxel
No "specialized" tuning program required..........Aftermarket will figure out the tuning part.
Why would the aftermarket need to if no specialized tuning is needed??
Just like any other mod, ever. How is this different than a fast, msd, or other intake? Besides adding a 2nd tb with a controller for that, you still need to tune for those.
Does edelbrock ship jets and settings for carbs with all its old school intakes? Nope, you have to tune them. Tuning is part of modding a car, if you can't handle it or don't have a shop to do it, stay stock. This is a race part, for high end all out applications, not a bolt on and go product.
Just like any other mod, ever. How is this different than a fast, msd, or other intake? Besides adding a 2nd tb with a controller for that, you still need to tune for those.
Does edelbrock ship jets and settings for carbs with all its old school intakes? Nope, you have to tune them. Tuning is part of modding a car, if you can't handle it or don't have a shop to do it, stay stock. This is a race part, for high end all out applications, not a bolt on and go product.
Any mods that change airflow/power need tuning.
We're not talking about an "old school" carb set-up. We're talking about a fuel-injected, (supposedly) direct replacement for the OEM LS3 piece.
How is it different from the "fast, msd, or other intake"? Really? You mean....beside the obvious.....right ?
They don't come with tuning. In some cases, you also need added parts like injector spacers/rails.
It isn't marketed as a direct replacement for ls3 manifolds. it is a ls3 port shape for that style of head. Hell, it won't even fit a vette without moving coils, alternator, etc.
They don't come with tuning. In some cases, you also need added parts like injector spacers/rails.
It isn't marketed as a direct replacement for ls3 manifolds. it is a ls3 port shape for that style of head. Hell, it won't even fit a vette without moving coils, alternator, etc.
Are you comparing the assembling of the Edelbrock intake manifold versus any type of FAST intake manifold under the close hood of a Corvette using a MAF and a secured/efficient air filtering system...
I think you guys are missing Unreal's point. The new Edelbrock is no different than any other intake manifold or major engine mod in that they all require tuning and possibly additional parts for a complete fit. Now whether or not that tuning will be more complex than standard IMs I couldn't say. But it will require tuning just like a FAST, ported stock IM, etc. Unless he is blind and using a voice interactive PC, I don't think he would say the Edelbrock is the same as other IMs.
But this thread is about the Vararam manifold......I think
Are you comparing the assembling of the Edelbrock intake manifold versus any type of FAST intake manifold under the close hood of a Corvette using a MAF and a secured/efficient air filtering system...
Seriously???
Still requires extra parts, still requires tuning. This is a more extreme race version, so it needs an extra TB and adapter. It was never meant to be a bolt on and go for a corvette. SD tuning isn't harder than any other method. More time consuming possibly, but not harder.
Plus you could still run a maf with this if you wanted. No reason it wouldn't work. Only downside to the maf would be air leaks on the unmetered side. Could run dual 4" inlets to the filter, and just put the maf on the drivers side on, and account for the airflow in the tables.
99% would not benefit from the added volume or complexity of dual 90 mm throttle bodies. Team Corvette races a C7R with twin inlet restrictors at about 30 mm each (a half dollar piece is 30.61 mm), it's plenum volume that is the most influential on NA motors and forced induction motors can push a ton of air through a single 102 TB. If twin TB's is your thing they look cool but I haven't seen documented benefits.
I find the arguments against running a single MAF and then splitting into dual tubes for the edelbrock manifold funny seeing as how thats essentially what the vararam intake design does. The vararam just utilizes a single TB instead of dual TBs. The dual plenum aspect of both manifolds is very similar.
I find the arguments against running a single MAF and then splitting into dual tubes for the edelbrock manifold funny seeing as how thats essentially what the vararam intake design does. The vararam just utilizes a single TB instead of dual TBs. The dual plenum aspect of both manifolds is very similar.
My post is not an argument, merely an opinion. I thought you mentioned running dual TB's, if that's not what you said I got it wrong. Run LS7 MAF card in large tubing into 102 TB then split to feed the dual plenums would be my choice if going with the Edelbrock.