When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Coil packs have nothing to do with surging. Get to a tuner that can restore a stock tune and get the airflow and timing tables tuned correctly. There must be 3 dozen cars running this cam on this forum with zero issues. Your car is mobile so drive it to a tuner that factually got one tuned right. A road trip is way cheaper than a cam install. All of this assumes it is installed correctly with no air leaks in the intake tract. I know how frustrating it can be, not knowing what the problem is.
This is a very low overlap cam and if a tuner can't tune this, forget anything bigger. I wish you were close to Colorado.
Where was the cam sourced?
I'd want it cam doctored if you do take it out.
Hey Spin, you are correct. i'm frustrated. anyhow we made progress. it's the fueling. with the o2's swinging in CL at ~14.8 afr she is not happy. we went open loop for a test around 12.8-13afr per the WB and that missing/surging went away. my WB is in the kooks x pipe on the passenger side just before the 3" race cat.
the cam was from Texas speed.
oldmotorhead - yes there are plenty of cams around. no one has a tune. they were all tuned by shops from what i see.
Hey Spin, you are correct. i'm frustrated. anyhow we made progress. it's the fueling. with the o2's swinging in CL at ~14.8 afr she is not happy. we went open loop for a test around 12.8-13afr per the WB and that missing/surging went away. my WB is in the kooks x pipe on the passenger side just before the 3" race cat.
the cam was from Texas speed.
oldmotorhead - yes there are plenty of cams around. no one has a tune. they were all tuned by shops from what i see.
Plan C is for me to tune it if you can't get it right. But when...
Long shot here but did you get a ported throttle body? If that was done wrong it opens a world of Pandora pain if they ported past the blade.
I need to scan and look at the install in person. The number of iterations of scan-tune-scan-tune, takes too long. Remote tunes are not as good for part throttle tuning.
Spin, stock throttle body. everything is stock aside from the cold air intake cam and longtube exhaust.
you are correct with the length of time to tune remotely. that's where i'm frustrated. so currently that surging is gone if i run the car in open loop with a13.5 afr. my new problem is we are tuning the VVE with MAF disabled. just steady state cruising the car will go extremely lean and buck then come back to normal. i was told this is dynamic air because the MAF is disabled. outside of the current issue it seems to be driving rather well.
i didn't realize you tuned, let me know your thoughts on the above. appreciate it.
Tuner say's all the data looks good. it looks good to me as well. still have some surge when afr's are over 13~. at light throttle
i noticed some increased drivetrain slop when letting off and on the throttle. wondering if this is causing what i feel and think is the engine. could be just a coincidence. torque tube is not making any noises that i can hear. may have to rip that out and take a look over the winter.
don't understand all the specs well, but they are similar with more lift...
I do want to go boost afterward so a turbo/SC cam isnt too far off from what I'd like to run.
Planning on running stock heads, slightly lower compression pistons (TBD how much less in the future..)
don't understand all the specs well, but they are similar with more lift...
I do want to go boost afterward so a turbo/SC cam isnt too far off from what I'd like to run.
Planning on running stock heads, slightly lower compression pistons (TBD how much less in the future..)
The second cam won't play nice with stock rocker arms no matter if they're trunnion upgraded or not. If you go that route, you should budget a set of roller rockers too.
The first cam you linked is almost exactly the cam I'm running now. I've been running it for 5 years and 50K miles with 0 issues, great drivability, and good power. Sure, there is more power to be had with a bigger cam but I'm not willing to live with the drivability and efficiency tradeoffs.
Tx Speed cam: 225/234 .629"/.600" 115+3 LSA
My cam: 226/234 .620/.620 115+4 LSA Custom ground by Cam Motion
I'm running CNC ported and milled heads on a stock bottom end LS3. Tx Speed did the porting ($700 at the time). Pretty good bang for the buck mod if you have to pull the heads off anyway. Not sure I would have ported them if I didn't have to pull the heads for a lifter upgrade. Mine did 500/454 Std on a Dynojet.
My static CR is about 11.3:1. I can still add a blower if I have to scratch that itch. It will just have to be a flex fuel setup. Just about any forced induction rig will benefit from E fuels though. Doing a fuel system compatible with flex fuel isn't that much more expensive than just a fuel pump upgrade for pump gas. I wouldn't lower your static CR at all. Lots of LS engines running around at stock CR with forced induction.
Thanks, Motorhead. With the .20" lift difference, do you think that would be significant for a non turbo car? I was worried about the lift spec on the supercharger cam, but TSP seems to like the high lift stuff.
The "stg 1" SC cam from Tx is: 223/231, .629"/.629", 115 LSA, 112 ICL - would that be nearly the same as yours, just with a 3 degree retard, and slightly more lift?
Thanks, Motorhead. With the .20" lift difference, do you think that would be significant for a non turbo car? I was worried about the lift spec on the supercharger cam, but TSP seems to like the high lift stuff.
The "stg 1" SC cam from Tx is: 223/231, .629"/.629", 115 LSA, 112 ICL - would that be nearly the same as yours, just with a 3 degree retard, and slightly more lift?
I consider .620 lift to be the max I would consider. I don't think there's a lift number that you need to stay behind on a stock LS valve train. Arguments abound either way. That's just my own number. All said and done....620 to .629 probably doesn't matter. It's just too easy to order the lift you want, the duration you want, the LSA you want, with the advance you want from Cam Motion.
I'm no cam guru. Just an old redneck that's had enough cams in LS engines to know what floats my boat. I tend to err on the side of liking less vs more when it comes to cam specs. I also think it's really dumb to spec a cam that's stupid small. If you're spending the time and money to do a cam swap, get your money's worth.
I agree with Motorhead. If you err, do it on the conservative side. Also, in the best interest of correct figures, .20" lift difference is incorrect. It should read .020". If it was .20", you'd have a +.800" lift cam!!!
I agree with Motorhead. If you err, do it on the conservative side. Also, in the best interest of correct figures, .20" lift difference is incorrect. It should read .020". If it was .20", you'd have a +.800" lift cam!!!
See? There you go again...thinking too deep and too much...
don't understand all the specs well, but they are similar with more lift...
I do want to go boost afterward so a turbo/SC cam isnt too far off from what I'd like to run.
Planning on running stock heads, slightly lower compression pistons (TBD how much less in the future..)
Old Motorhead's combo is proven. I wouldn't reinvent the wheel. No one posts results from tuner cams and that scares me off.
A 226/234 with mild ported heads making 500rw is a win and it drives nice. I'm old. That's what I like.
i like the spin spec'd cam in my vette aside from the issue i'm having which i'm planning on taking the torque tube out this winter to see if that's the cause of my issue. might as well throw a clutch in there while i'm at it. been busy with a g20 conversion van i bought
Old Motorhead's combo is proven. I wouldn't reinvent the wheel. No one posts results from tuner cams and that scares me off.
A 226/234 with mild ported heads making 500rw is a win and it drives nice. I'm old. That's what I like.
^^^^This post^^^^ Is aka COMMON SENSE!! I remember the first cam I ever put in a Chevy V8 engine. My buddy was pretty good at doing SBCs, even in his late teens. I was a motorcycle engine guy. His dad gave advice. I never forgot it. I wanted to put at least a 3/4 race cam (as we called them 55 years ago!) in it. The dad says "You have a simple choice to make." Then he asked me "Are you gonna drive it to work, or are you gonna race it?" For clarity, it was a full size, 1975 Blazer, with the 350 SBC. Had all of 8.25:1 compression. Yes, 8.25:1!! 160hp stock. Can you imagine running a 3/4 race cam in a 5,000lb, 4x4, with 3.08 gears, on 8.25:1 compression?! We ended up putting some 291 camel back 2.02 heads on it, with the GM 350/350 cam, Edelbrock Torker, and a 650 vacuum secondary 7002 Holley, a Quadrajet replacement. It ran damn good!! Because I listened to sage advice and erred on the milder side on the cam. Excitement, and Walter Mitty thinking, can doom an engine.......
As long as I opened my Yapper, I'll also say I prefer motorheads choice of cam grinders, too. Not many have been unhappy with Cam Motion. I'm buying my 3rd Cam Motion cam this next spring. It'll probably be my last one.
^^^^This post^^^^ Is aka COMMON SENSE!! I remember the first cam I ever put in a Chevy V8 engine. My buddy was pretty good at doing SBCs, even in his late teens. I was a motorcycle engine guy. His dad gave advice. I never forgot it. I wanted to put at least a 3/4 race cam (as we called them 55 years ago!) in it. The dad says "You have a simple choice to make." Then he asked me "Are you gonna drive it to work, or are you gonna race it?" For clarity, it was a full size, 1975 Blazer, with the 350 SBC. Had all of 8.25:1 compression. Yes, 8.25:1!! 160hp stock. Can you imagine running a 3/4 race cam in a 5,000lb, 4x4, with 3.08 gears, on 8.25:1 compression?! We ended up putting some 291 camel back 2.02 heads on it, with the GM 350/350 cam, Edelbrock Torker, and a 650 vacuum secondary 7002 Holley, a Quadrajet replacement. It ran damn good!! Because I listened to sage advice and erred on the milder side on the cam. Excitement, and Walter Mitty thinking, can doom an engine.......
I did something very similar to a 1977 Z28. It had probably the same anemic small block 350 as yours, upgraded springs and sways, a Super T10 four speed, and a really dumb looking decal on the hood. I used a single plane intake manifold (don't remember the name, but it was a step down from the Torker). Some manner of Holley 600CFM carb with vacuum secondaries. The cam was made by Crane and was a knock off of the 350/350hp flat tappet hydraulic Chevy grind. The icing on the cake was a very rudimentary plate nitrous system. It ran good. Seems like the bottle was always empty though...Haven't fooled with nitrous since than. That was about 45 years ago.
^^^^This post^^^^ Is aka COMMON SENSE!! I remember the first cam I ever put in a Chevy V8 engine. My buddy was pretty good at doing SBCs, even in his late teens. I was a motorcycle engine guy. His dad gave advice. I never forgot it. I wanted to put at least a 3/4 race cam (as we called them 55 years ago!) in it. The dad says "You have a simple choice to make." Then he asked me "Are you gonna drive it to work, or are you gonna race it?" For clarity, it was a full size, 1975 Blazer, with the 350 SBC. Had all of 8.25:1 compression. Yes, 8.25:1!! 160hp stock. Can you imagine running a 3/4 race cam in a 5,000lb, 4x4, with 3.08 gears, on 8.25:1 compression?! We ended up putting some 291 camel back 2.02 heads on it, with the GM 350/350 cam, Edelbrock Torker, and a 650 vacuum secondary 7002 Holley, a Quadrajet replacement. It ran damn good!! Because I listened to sage advice and erred on the milder side on the cam. Excitement, and Walter Mitty thinking, can doom an engine.......
My dad asked why I needed 2 carbs on a 426 dodge. I explained that it took 2 gallons of gas to run the quarter mile. He laughed and said, "My 66 impala wagon can go a quarter mile 48 times with one gallon of gas.(12 miles/gallon)"
My dad asked why I needed 2 carbs on a 426 dodge. I explained that it took 2 gallons of gas to run the quarter mile. He laughed and said, "My 66 impala wagon can go a quarter mile 48 times with one gallon of gas.(12 miles/gallon)"
Merry Christmas guys.
Back at ya! Hope everyone has a safe and glorious Christmas season. And don't forget the reason for the season!