When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have confirmed early spy pics of a test mule showing the new spoiler that will be standard on the C7. GM is adding spoilers to make the new generation Corvette competitive with the high performance vehicles being considered as alternative choices by the much-desired younger demographic of sports car purchasers.
Look, forget about the Evo thing everybody. You guys are really missing the forest for the trees here. Nobody was saying that a 4-cylinder car was better than a Corvette. .....
Well, I can forget the EVO thing, but you did bring it up.
Originally Posted by Endeka
….. Do you enjoy having your $60,000 sports car legitimately rivaled in a quarter mile by a $35,000 four cylinder Japanese sedan? Because I don't. …...
And if you believe this;
Originally Posted by Endeka
I'd say a 1-second distance is a legitimate rivaling, not in terms of beating the C6, but in terms of a close race. …..
you should get to a strip more. As McGirk94LT1 posted, one second is huge.
This is what I was saying earlier. If people had had this attitude in the early 80's, the C3 diehards would have said, "If you want a fast car that doesn't handle like crap, go buy a Porsche; we like our inexpensive, body-roll-tastic C3 just the way it is," and the FRC, Z06 and ZR-1/ZR1 would never have existed. Somebody listened to the people agitating for change, and we got the C4, C5, and C6, and people around the world started paying attention, because the Corvette could roll with the best in the world. I don't want to see the design get dug in, get long in the tooth, and become irrelevant on the world stage again, like the Corvette pretty much was in 1980.
I love the Corvette, that's why I want it to keep up. Sure, most Corvette owners want the car to stick with tried-and-true tradition, but most Corvette owners (if the cars on the dealer lots are any indication) also like 4-speed slushboxes, so their opinion on sports cars is utterly worthless anyway; they'd take whatever crap GM shoveled onto their plate with a smile on their face and call it the greatest thing since sliced bread. Its the people who are shopping for the best car that they need to worry about placating, because they're the ones who are going to compare an inferior-performing GM car to a superior-performing car from another brand, and leave GM for that other brand. Right now, the C6 is pretty much top dog in its price bracket; with the GTR and maybe the GT 500 as its only legitimate rivals. I'd like it to stay that way.
I was driving in the early 80's and ALL cars except the absolute most exotic performed like crap.
The addition of launch control and very expensive, short-life, dry-weather-only tires allowed the 2012 Z06 to beat the 2013 GTR
I see some of your points above but just need to note something...it's not like the Nissan GTR rides on '400 tread wear 60k+ mile life' tires either ya know.
It too comes with virtual race tires (along with it's AWD "advantage"), just like the Z06 in that test.
The Nissan GT-R is "shoed" by Bridgestone and Dunlop with specially developed tires with stiff treads, essential for high-speed driving.
From Nissan's press Release:
Tires:
As befits a very special car, so the tires for the Nissan GT-R are unique, specially developed for Nissan's flagship. The tires offer an extraordinary combination of high-speed balance, high-grip cornering on the world's most testing racing circuits (such as the Nürburgring), great traction in the rain plus pliant comfort in the city.
Specially developed by Bridgestone and Dunlop, the tires have very stiff treads, essential for high-speed driving.
I love how some of you despise the idea of AWD but yet you are probably the same people who wouldnt mind a paddle shift automatic or even a DCT over a true manual transmission!
I love how some of you despise the idea of AWD but yet you are probably the same people who wouldnt mind a paddle shift automatic or even a DCT over a true manual transmission!
That wouldn't be me. I drive an 800hp 6spd manual FRC. RWD, Manual Transmission, and the most fun with my clothes on in the twisties.
I will be driving manual transmissions until they bury me in the ground.
I love how some of you despise the idea of AWD but yet you are probably the same people who wouldnt mind a paddle shift automatic or even a DCT over a true manual transmission!
Que? What are you talking about? I think the people in here with skill that don't want to just "mash the gas" are manual drivers.
Originally Posted by JustinStrife
That wouldn't be me. I drive an 800hp 6spd manual FRC. RWD, Manual Transmission, and the most fun with my clothes on in the twisties.
I will be driving manual transmissions until they bury me in the ground.
Yep... I bought a Z06 for a reason. I don't like autos. The only way I'd want one is if I at least had 1 manual. So if I'm going to have just 1 car, it will be a manual.
I hope they still have time to tweak the exterior a little bit...because that tail end is BUTT UGLY.
They have a good start so far, but dang they NEED to listen to some customer feedback a bit before they hit the green light on production....please GM please...
Que? What are you talking about? I think the people in here with skill that don't want to just "mash the gas" are manual drivers.
Are you saying that people who drive automatics dont have skill? I dont think a transmission type matters whether or not you have the urges to "mash the gas" or not. You can easily lose control of an automatic equipped vehicle as well if your not careful. I have driving skill, but still mash the gas at times. Of course I only do it when I see its feasible.
Are you saying that people who drive automatics dont have skill? I dont think a transmission type matters whether or not you have the urges to "mash the gas" or not. You can easily lose control of an automatic equipped vehicle as well if your not careful.
Well said.
From a drag racing perspective at least, it is well known that the manuals do take quite a bit more skill to master than the automatics but that certainly doesn't mean that the automatics drive themselves either. I can assure everyone that the record setting stock and bolt on results that I've achieved in my C6 didn't come easily or by merely utilizing the ol' stab & steer method like some tend to think LOL.
Are you saying that people who drive automatics dont have skill? I dont think a transmission type matters whether or not you have the urges to "mash the gas" or not. You can easily lose control of an automatic equipped vehicle as well if your not careful. I have driving skill, but still mash the gas at times. Of course I only do it when I see its feasible.
No... I was making a point. Read what I was quoting and referring to. pTr73 was trying to make a point to say that the same people that don't want AWD are the same people that drive automatics. But my point was that the people making comments about wanting AWD are the people that are looking for the best 0-60 times. And automatics make for better drag racing cars. Point being that he's making an assumption that it's the stick drivers that want AWD when it's not really biased towards any transmission.
I've crashed more cars with an auto than with manuals (actually, all the cars I've crashed were autos), so there's no argument here. But lets be honest, it takes a lot more skill to launch a manual than an auto.
I love how some of you despise the idea of AWD but yet you are probably the same people who wouldnt mind a paddle shift automatic or even a DCT over a true manual transmission!
One could also argue that if that were true, that people wanted a RWD dual clutch trans car, that they were looking for the most efficient and quickest car you could get? There is no arguement that a DCT will always shift faster shaving valuble tenths off a track time, a human simply can not shift in miniscule fractions of a second. There is however an arguement that the added weight/characteristics of AWD are not beneficial soooooo...
I see some of your points above but just need to note something...it's not like the Nissan GTR rides on '400 tread wear 60k+ mile life' tires either ya know.
It too comes with virtual race tires (along with it's AWD "advantage"), just like the Z06 in that test.
And I have a friend who has an 07... the maintenance viciously rapes you several times a year. It is nothing, nothing like a Corvette in that department. Despite what anyone says about performance, that is a serious check mark for the Vette-the Z06 really is MUCH cheaper if you consider that, after paying around the GTR's price for the Z06+3LZ+Carbon package, you get to enjoy 30% of the maintenance costs for the life of the car. I love that it feels like a blunt object some times. I'd be scared to dig into the $35,000 ENGINE of a 911 Turbo. With the Vette? No biggie. So tame and easy to work on.
Also, where did you get the times for the 80's C3? I wasn't seeing any 0-60 times lower than 9 seconds on the site I usually rely on. Not saying its wrong, I'm just concerned that all my statistics for years might have been off.
I will be driving manual transmissions until they bury me in the ground.
I agree with you on driving a true manual til I die but I suspect the manual tranmission will succumb to the DCT and paddle shifters like the carburetor did to fuel injection.
It appears that all the new exotics such as the likes of ferraris and lambos have clutchless transmissions now.
No... I was making a point. Read what I was quoting and referring to. pTr73 was trying to make a point to say that the same people that don't want AWD are the same people that drive automatics.
I didnt say "they are" i said "they probably are", meaning it is an educated guess. And before you jump to say I am wrong, you would have to first poll the entire vette owning community to see who drives a stick or auto and then ask them if they want AWD. lol
But my point was that the people making comments about wanting AWD are the people that are looking for the best 0-60 times. And automatics make for better drag racing cars. Point being that he's making an assumption that it's the stick drivers that want AWD when it's not really biased towards any transmission.
There are a few reasons why I wouldnt mind seeing AWD, number 1 it would be interesting to see how GM would design the thing. 2 it would also be used as a safety feature on wet pavements since I see alot of you guys use your car in rain and stuff. I would like it for the reason that it would put the power to the ground alot better than a stand alone RWD. You cant deny the fact that an AWD car can handle monstrous power levels better than any RWD out there. The HP levels of the newer cars are getting bigger. My guess is that the C8 might very well be sold off the showroom floor with 600+ HP.
I've crashed more cars with an auto than with manuals (actually, all the cars I've crashed were autos), so there's no argument here. But lets be honest, it takes a lot more skill to launch a manual than an auto.
Do you use an automatic just as much as you use a manual? If not then this statement isnt really valid. The odds change unless you drive each type of tranny equally. Yes it takes alot more skill to launch and shift a manual. But its not only that for me, It also allows the driver more control of the vehicle which is one of the many reasons I prefer it over an automatic.
There is however an arguement that the added weight/characteristics of AWD are not beneficial soooooo...
Before you officially say that explain how the 2012 GTR is quicker than the ZR1 in a drag race?
The vette being lighter and more aerodynamic for starters, and not to mention the 50ish HP difference between the 2 cars. I am guessing the vette should consistently be at least 3 cars ahead everytime.
One could also argue that if that were true, that people wanted a RWD dual clutch trans car, that they were looking for the most efficient and quickest car you could get? There is no arguement that a DCT will always shift faster shaving valuble tenths off a track time, a human simply can not shift in miniscule fractions of a second. There is however an arguement that the added weight/characteristics of AWD are not beneficial soooooo...
That's EXACTLY where I'm coming from on this subject. I've made RWD work in my particular situation so I personally don't need/want the 'downsides' (weight/cost/complexity) associated with most AWD systems, in my Corvettes at least.
But yet in private hands a bone stock ZR1 has gone almost a full second quicker and nearly 4mph faster than that (10.6@132+mph) in the 1/4 mile.
Hmm, either the Road & Track test drivers are REALLY bad or perhaps Nissan pays them lots more for advertising LOL.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.