When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The cars are meant for different markets. One is a 200k+ supercar and the other a mass appeal car. That the corvette gives you 95% of the performance for 1/3 the cost shows how far GM has come. Most people that can afford the 458 will buy one because they want one sports car not two. .....
In Naples, Florida you will see more 458's running around then C7's because the people can afford them.
Avalon
Every product has its market niche or it wouldn't be on the market, like a $30 Timex Quartz that keeps better time than a $3 million small production mechanical watch ... or a $40K boat that get you from point A to Point B faster than a $400 million mega yacht ...or you sleep just as well in a $100K house as in a $100 million London or Paris penthouse
Last edited by usroute66 MKW; Nov 5, 2013 at 03:34 PM.
'Yeah, that's my 2013 Ferrari" are certainly words most, but not all, of us would like to say--- and would if we comfortably could. Still fun to compare actual performance numbers with a Chevrolet Corvette though. And there are many, many people who covet a late model Corvette who aren't in a position where owning one is possible and/or makes sense.
The 458 is a great car but it is not perfect. The AC, Radio, and Nav suck for example. The interior wears if you only look at it. It attracts too much attention from people you don't want attention from. The options are just stupid crazy ($3500 for electric seats, 3300 for Nav plus 2000 for the Sat antenna, 6000 for the Carbon fibre dash, even 900 for a stupid Ipod cable. Those little yellow shields on the side --- $1800)
On the other hand, the sound and fury it delivers at 9 grand is mind blowing. The shifting is lighting fast. And the looks are somewhere between Sophia Loren in the 60's and Kate Upton.
The C7 looks like a great daily driver. The 458 just isn't.
The cars are apples and oranges. One thing you can do with the C7 is drive it 3000 miles across the country and not have it devalue by $10,000. Ferrari owners are their own worst enemy. The are so picky on things that shouldn't matter that they consider a car having "high mileage" anything near 10,000 miles. Stupid.
For the price you pay, that is ridiculous. I know everybody is up in arms about the perceived quality of a Corvette at $60,000, so why is it excusable on a Ferrari which costs 4 times as much?
Two great cars. Both are excellent performance machines, They are close in performance numbers, but the 458 will all run the C7 all day long. it is said to do 0-60 in 3.0 and in the Spider it is 3.3. As far as track times it will depend on the driver and the conditions of the track when the run is done. The C7 was not able to keep up with the F12 and it is not the performance machine that the 458 is. But when you compare the price difference, I think many a Ferrari owner will be impressed with what the C7 can do and at a price that is a quarter of what you would pay for the 458.
i wonder just how many on here would select the C7 over the 458 if we all had unlimited funds to spend. I know I for one would be in the 458. in fact i have a frind with a new California and I told him my pocket book drives a Corvette, but my heart drives a Ferrari.
Just gorgeous Sin. Has the maintenance improved? I loved my 355 but got sick of the dealer visits - I suppose if you have to ask...
One day, I'll have a 458, but I'll shop used. Can't get comfortable with the idea of dropping $250+K, only to get t-boned by an escalade on the way home, which would just be my sort of luck.
Isn't a Z06 faster than a 458 on track? Here are the top production car times for Nurburgring Nordeschelife
Not really apples to apples when the Corvettes are on cup tires and the 458 is on street tires.
Anyway this thread is about the c7. Don't get me wrong, I love the c7 and I've ordered one. I just think it's silly to compare it to one of the greatest automobiles in the world.
Ps has anyone seen the specs on the 458 Speciale?
597hp
2844 lbs
Tons of aero
Astronomical price (speculative)
I think the 458 is gorgeous. I actually like the C7 rear better than the 458 rear though. Ferrari should have kept the dual round tail lights. The interior…. I'm just not feeling the love.
Agreed on the interior. The 458 is my favourite car and I would take it over any other BUT, material quality aside, I have not liked the "design" of Ferrari interiors in some time. I don't like that the dash doesn't have a console to the armrest area and there is too much going on... that wouldn't stop me from buying one though
Just gorgeous Sin. Has the maintenance improved? I loved my 355 but got sick of the dealer visits - I suppose if you have to ask...
One day, I'll have a 458, but I'll shop used. Can't get comfortable with the idea of dropping $250+K, only to get t-boned by an escalade on the way home, which would just be my sort of luck.
Maintenance FREE for 7 years.
Actually, the cost or running them has been dropping with each model since the early 90's. The 458 requires only something like 19 hours of total maintenance over 3 years.
But the 12's come with this service free for 7 years. This model is a 2013.
If you buy used, buy a 12 or newer.
I ordered it with the racing package with full CF interior and wheel. The red stripes in the center of the seat is not a standard option on the list. It costed $1400. Stitching the red horsey logos in the seat costed $1200. Stupid.
For the price you pay, that is ridiculous. I know everybody is up in arms about the perceived quality of a Corvette at $60,000, so why is it excusable on a Ferrari which costs 4 times as much?
For the price you pay, that is ridiculous. I know everybody is up in arms about the perceived quality of a Corvette at $60,000, so why is it excusable on a Ferrari which costs 4 times as much?
The price differential to a Ferrari isn't all about perceived quality. Much of it is due to differences in amortization over lower number of units. Ferrari's price might be 4 times higher, but its volume could be 6 times lower. While it shares drivetrain development with other Ferraris and Maseratis, these are all still very low-volume cars compared to where GM will be putting the SBC with which the Corvette shares its development (and upon which it depends for its outstanding objective bang/buck ratio): SUVs, trucks, Camaros, possibly high-end Cadillac sedans and coupes, Vauxhalls/Holdens in other markets, etc. You can bet that if GM developed a 9k rpm screamer for perhaps only 4-5k cars per year, they'll likely not charge only $60k.
Actually, the cost or running them has been dropping with each model since the early 90's. The 458 requires only something like 19 hours of total maintenance over 3 years.
But the 12's come with this service free for 7 years. This model is a 2013. If you buy used, buy a 12 or newer.
Beautiful car!
Does the free maintenance service cover replacing brake pads and rotors with track use? The rotor cost scares me the most.
How much value would approximately be lost on a 2013 458 with just 24 track days after two years vs a garage queen?
Last edited by track junkie; Nov 5, 2013 at 08:48 PM.
The price differential to a Ferrari isn't all about perceived quality. Much of it is due to differences in amortization over lower number of units. Ferrari's price might be 4 times higher, but its volume could be 6 times lower. While it shares drivetrain development with other Ferraris and Maseratis, these are all still very low-volume cars compared to where GM will be putting the SBC with which the Corvette shares its development (and upon which it depends for its outstanding objective bang/buck ratio): SUVs, trucks, Camaros, possibly high-end Cadillac sedans and coupes, Vauxhalls/Holdens in other markets, etc. You can bet that if GM developed a 9k rpm screamer for perhaps only 4-5k cars per year, they'll likely not charge only $60k.
So that makes it okay for the A/C, navigation, and radio to be garbage?
You can't compare the two. It's like comparing a $99 tablet to an iPad Air because the specs are similar on paper.
the C7 is a great car, the performance model is going to be better, that being said, C'MON MAN! no corvette,viper or any other car except lamborghni , and a few other exotics , can be compared.
So that makes it okay for the A/C, navigation, and radio to be garbage?
No, it doesn't. But you're going to need more than one person's opinion to make that assertion. There is far from any consensus that the nav system is "garbage" or "sucks" on the Ferrari forums, for instance.
The corvette in no way compares to the 458 and the only thing it wins on is value. It's embarrassing to even see this thread on here. For the people saying a z06 takes it in a drag race, that's not what the 458 was built for.
Originally Posted by joenationwide
Isn't a Z06 faster than a 458 on track?
Here are the top production car times for Nurburgring Nordeschelife
Originally Posted by lve2xlr8
Not really apples to apples when the Corvettes are on cup tires and the 458 is on street tires.
Anyway this thread is about the c7. Don't get me wrong, I love the c7 and I've ordered one. I just think it's silly to compare it to one of the greatest automobiles in the world.
Ps has anyone seen the specs on the 458 Speciale?
lve2xlr8b - OH Man, that is THE weakest reply to joenationwide's post. The 458 comes with OE Maximum Performance Summer tires. If, as you profess, the Corvette "in no way compared to the 458 & a Z06 (only) takes it in a drag race", then 458 should blow away the Z06 on the Nurburgring on it's OE rubber, with ease.
I am appreciative of both cars - and I agree that they are apples and oranges in numerous ways. However the most comparable Corvette to the 458, the Z06, is a most valid competitor to the 458 in track performance.
Lastly, you try to simply dismiss the Ring lap time resluts and change the discussion by telling joenationwide "anyway this thread is about the C7", when in fact the Thread Title is C7 vrs 458.
Both cars are excellent. In many ways the Corvette more than holds it's own, imho.
Does the free maintenance service cover replacing brake pads and rotors with track use? The rotor cost scares me the most.
How much value would approximately be lost on a 2013 458 with just 24 track days after two years vs a garage queen?
At least $30K, possibly more, given that pristine, low mileage cars are readily available.
Originally Posted by Slappy3243
So that makes it okay for the A/C, navigation, and radio to be garbage?
Originally Posted by Guibo
No, it doesn't. But you're going to need more than one person's opinion to make that assertion. There is far from any consensus that the nav system is "garbage" or "sucks" on the Ferrari forums, for instance.
The A/C works perfectly during summertime in Dallas. The radio is good, not great. As for the Nav, I do not have an opinion because I did not order it.
My three year old saw a C7 Corvette picture in a car magazine, and keeps insisting that it is a Ferrari. At night, when I saw a C7 behind me, the front lights look very similar to a 458.
Isn't a Z06 faster than a 458 on track?
Here are the top production car times for Nurburgring Nordeschelife
...
10. Nissan GT-R 7:19.10 11. Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 7:19.63
12. Dodge Viper ACR 7:22.1 13. Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Z07 Package 7:22.68
... 23. Ferrari 458 Italia 7:28.00
On similar tires and with similar drivers (mfrs' engineers), probably not. Ferrari has never released a 'Ring time for street cars with its factory driver. IIRC, that 458 time isn't legit (it's Bridge to Gantry, isn't it?). Not that it isn't believable, considering Auto Bild's pro driver (with only a few laps) did the full 20.8 km circuit in 7:32 with a journalist passenger. The GT-R in the same test was 11 seconds slower. The ZR1 on non R-compound semi-slicks tested in a similar manner with the same driver, but with a couple of damp corners, recorded a 7:41. The Sport Auto supertest has them running 7:38. The Z06 last tested on the old Goodyears ran a 7:49.
Originally Posted by MKDFW
The A/C works perfectly during summertime in Dallas. The radio is good, not great. As for the Nav, I do not have an opinion because I did not order it.
Good to know. Opinion on fchat seems to be split about the radio. Some people like it, some don't. (Some have found a sweeter tonal balance by tweeking their iPod settings.) Some love the optional high-end system, others wouldn't pay that much extra for it. A lot of people with the Nav seem very happy with it, with the exception of those living in the UK where the system doesn't accept the longer postal codes. Hardly anyone describes the systems as "garbage."