What would you do?




He had numerous chances to re negotiate the price up to the point he signed the contract. Some states even give you 3 days AFTER you sign the docs.
But to come back months later and almost a thousand miles later is just not going to cut it.
OP, did you sign anything which outlines all of the vehicle's option.
You're right, that's impossible to dispute. However, if in fact the OP has emails agreeing to a price with the MSRC being included and the dealer agreeing to it, it's a formal contract in the eyes of the law. OP fully executed his part of the contract by purchasing the vehicle, the dealer may not have.
Last edited by Mfserge; Jul 1, 2014 at 05:39 PM.
Sorry if I rambled.

The dealer owes him NOTHING! He should have looked at the sticker when he was buying the car!
I have purchased around 20 new cars and each and every time they sat down and went over the numbers with me BEFORE I wrote the check.
This to me seems like the "Hand out" mentality. It is a lesson learned to the OP and nothing more.
The only way this has any merit is if the window sticker says it has MRC and the car left the factory without it. Other than that, he is stuck and the dealer owes him NOTHING and should do NOTHING.
I honestly can't believe the crap that some of the people on this forum write.

By driving away in the car he agreed the way it built, sold, and delivered. What needed to be done was to verify the requisition, and if it didn't match the ordered then deny delivery or work out a discount that day not months later.









I frankly didn't read your first post closely enough to find out if
a. you actually PAID for MRC, but the car came in without it, or
b. you ordered MRC, the car came in without it, and you paid X dollars less and had one option less than you originally "ordered."
The window sticker will tell if it was on the car, or supposed to be----there are rare cases where something is listed but not actually on the car (VERY rare).
Let's hear from you.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
On May 28, I was looking over the supplied factory built sheet for the Corvette and noticed a block that annotated Suspension FE3. I soon came to realize, I incorrectly thought each time I was changing the mode select switch on the center console my ride was being adjusted. Suffice to say the steering/exhaust/throttle response along with a host of other things was being electronically modified, but not my suspension.
I thought to myself how the heck did I miss it? I looked back at the GM Order WORKBENCH paperwork and sure enough it listed FE3 vice FE4 for suspension. I’ll admit, I did not pick up on it, perhaps confusing FE3 with FE4, who knows. What I do know, I was charged for the option and the car lacks it.
I suppose some would say eat it. You had your chance to verify your car was, as ordered, when it arrived. I would contend MSRC is not as simple as other options to verify it’s truly on the car. I'll admit a role in this error, what bothers me the most is the lack of communication on the issue of overpayment for the car when I bring it up with my sales person.
Ultimately I paid over MSRP for a car that was to be sold at below MSRP. I would have thought when the dealerships planed on profit margin increased by $1795 they would have realized something was askew. I understand dealerships are in the business to make all the money they can, but when an oversight is pointed out it should be addressed in a well-timed manner.
I e-mailed my sales person on 5/28/14 explaining the situation and supplied all of our prior correspondences regarding options and agreed upon prices. I received a reply back in 13 minutes saying “I’ll have to look into this for you”.
One week goes by and I e-mailed for a status. No reply received back.
Two weeks go by and I emailed again for a status. No reply received back.
Three weeks go by and I emailed again for a status. I received a reply back 6 minutes stating, “Still looking into it….this is quite a request after the fact, trying to find documentation of such…I’ll be in touch”.
Four weeks go by and I e-mailed stating it should not take four weeks to figure out a vehicle that was agreed upon to be sold at below MSRP was in fact sold at above MSRP. I further stated unfortunately if we cannot come to a resolution on the matter, I will pursue other avenues. No reply received back.
Tomorrow will be 5 weeks with no resolve of any nature. What would you do next?
I am not sure where or what the dealer should do. You accepted the build sheet, with the car being ordered with FE3 on the work bench. The Error should have been caught by you then, before submitted to GM.
Next window sticker will list all options and MSRP. You should have looked at that before agreeing on price, and car. I am betting MSRC - FE4 was not on the window sticker. So it was not in the MSRP either.
Then you wait two months to look at build sheet?
I feel for you, and understand your being upset or unhappy. However you should have verified all option codes before the sales guy submitted the order.
I know, when ordering mine, I have every code for every thing I wanted. I checked the work bench order with it, then my wife checked it, then I checked it again before I let my sales guy submit it.
I when taking delivery of the car went line by line on the window sticker against my order, and the build sheets.
it, thats your proof,
On May 28, I was looking over the supplied factory built sheet for the Corvette and noticed a block that annotated Suspension FE3. I soon came to realize, I incorrectly thought each time I was changing the mode select switch on the center console my ride was being adjusted. Suffice to say the steering/exhaust/throttle response along with a host of other things was being electronically modified, but not my suspension.
I thought to myself how the heck did I miss it? I looked back at the GM Order WORKBENCH paperwork and sure enough it listed FE3 vice FE4 for suspension. I’ll admit, I did not pick up on it, perhaps confusing FE3 with FE4, who knows. What I do know, I was charged for the option and the car lacks it.
I suppose some would say eat it. You had your chance to verify your car was, as ordered, when it arrived. I would contend MSRC is not as simple as other options to verify it’s truly on the car. I'll admit a role in this error, what bothers me the most is the lack of communication on the issue of overpayment for the car when I bring it up with my sales person.
Ultimately I paid over MSRP for a car that was to be sold at below MSRP. I would have thought when the dealerships planed on profit margin increased by $1795 they would have realized something was askew. I understand dealerships are in the business to make all the money they can, but when an oversight is pointed out it should be addressed in a well-timed manner.
I e-mailed my sales person on 5/28/14 explaining the situation and supplied all of our prior correspondences regarding options and agreed upon prices. I received a reply back in 13 minutes saying “I’ll have to look into this for you”.
One week goes by and I e-mailed for a status. No reply received back.
Two weeks go by and I emailed again for a status. No reply received back.
Three weeks go by and I emailed again for a status. I received a reply back 6 minutes stating, “Still looking into it….this is quite a request after the fact, trying to find documentation of such…I’ll be in touch”.
Four weeks go by and I e-mailed stating it should not take four weeks to figure out a vehicle that was agreed upon to be sold at below MSRP was in fact sold at above MSRP. I further stated unfortunately if we cannot come to a resolution on the matter, I will pursue other avenues. No reply received back.
Tomorrow will be 5 weeks with no resolve of any nature. What would you do next?
Here's what I think happened, the OP ordered the car via a salesman and told them to include MRSC. The salesman either submitted an incorrect order sheet to the person who enters orders or that person incorrectly entered the order without checking the MRSC box. The workbench was printed and presented to the OP for acceptance, hopefully with the MSRP included, he accepted and the car was ordered. If this is what happened the error was at the very beginning but the price was correct based on the incorrect order. I don't believe the dealership owes him any money but obviously someone f'd up and should be held accountable.
The big question here that's been asked in a roundabout way is was the sales price on the contract the same as the MSRP on the workbench printout (and subsequently on the window sticker). Without that knowledge we are all just pontificating.
Honestly, it's not up to the customer to QC the workbench order, they ask for an option and assume all those 3 digit options on the sheet add up to what they wanted. What happened here is the result of either lazy or incompetent dealer staff. The OP probably doesn't have any legal standing but what the dealer does once alerted to the mistake will determine whether the OP or anyone else he talks to will do business with them in the future.





All he really has to do is take it in to the service dept and have them check it. They can simply run the vin and it will list all of the options of the car. Then he simply has to find out if he did or did not get charged for the FE4. It will be listed on the sticker. But if he did not save this, there is a paper trail a mile long. I sense that the car was not ordered with the FE4 and was not priced for it.
All he really has to do is take it in to the service dept and have them check it. They can simply run the vin and it will list all of the options of the car. Then he simply has to find out if he did or did not get charged for the FE4. It will be listed on the sticker. But if he did not save this, there is a paper trail a mile long. I sense that the car was not ordered with the FE4 and was not priced for it.
-Options and pricing are picked at the dealer with FE4 and pricing based on MSRP with FE4
-Car is ordered and built without FE4
-Sticker arrives without it, but OP doesn't check
-OP pays original agreed upon price, which was MSRP with FE4, but is now over MSRP (by the amount FE4 was) since FE4 is not on the car or sticker. OP doesn't check the sticker against the order.
If something else happened, then I'll change my opinion on who might be owed what, but I've been interpreting it like this.
The OP has a valid claim if he can produce emails stating that it was to be included, even if he signed a purchase order at the point of delivery. Did the dealership point out that the MSRC was omitted at the point of delivery even though it was supposed to be included? They have an obligation to review the customer’s order to ensure it matches the built vehicle; they failed to do so resulting in deceiving the buyer by charging him for options that were not included. With the number of options and codes for the vehicle’s option one could easily overlook an option such as FE3 vs FE4, should the buyer have no right to recoup his overpayment? I believe that the OP should be refunded for the option and I would even consider suing the dealership for consequential damages because now the OP has a vehicle which he didn’t order, and his ride comfort may be impacted by omitting this option (assuming he has proof that it was to be included), his enjoyment of the vehicle may suffer.










